Cockcroft Emma J, Williams Craig A, Tomlinson Owen W, Vlachopoulos Dimitris, Jackman Sarah R, Armstrong Neil, Barker Alan R
Children's Health and Exercise Research Centre, Sport and Health Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Children's Health and Exercise Research Centre, Sport and Health Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
J Sci Med Sport. 2015 Nov;18(6):720-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.10.001. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
High-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) may offer a time efficient means to improve health outcomes compared to moderate-intensity exercise (MIE). This study examined the acute effect of HIIE compared to a work-matched bout of MIE on glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity (IS), resting fat oxidation and exercise enjoyment in adolescent boys.
Within-measures design with counterbalanced experimental conditions.
Nine boys (14.2 ± 0.4 years) completed three conditions on separate days in a counterbalanced order: (1) HIIE; (2) work matched MIE, both on a cycle ergometer; and (3) rest (CON). An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed after exercise or rest and the area under curve (AUC) responses for plasma [glucose] and [insulin] were calculated, and IS estimated (Cederholm index). Energy expenditure and fat oxidation were measured following the OGTT using indirect calorimetry. Exercise enjoyment was assessed using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale.
The incremental AUC (iAUC) for plasma [glucose] was reduced following both MIE (-23.9%, P = 0.013, effect size [ES] = -0.64) and HIIE (-28.9%, P=0.008, ES = -0.84) compared to CON. The iAUC for plasma [insulin] was lower for HIIE (-24.2%, P = 0.021, ES = -0.71) and MIE (-29.1%, P = 0.012, ES = -0.79) compared to CON. IS increased by 11.2% after HIIE (P = 0.03, ES = 0.76) and 8.4% after MIE (P = 0.10, ES = 0.58). There was a trend for an increase in fat oxidation following HIIE (P = 0.097, ES = 0.70). Both HIIE and MIE were rated as equally enjoyable (P > 0.05, ES < 0.01).
A single bout of time efficient HIIE is an effective alternative to MIE for improving glucose tolerance and IS in adolescent boys immediately after exercise.
与中等强度运动(MIE)相比,高强度间歇运动(HIIE)可能提供一种提高健康效益的高效省时方法。本研究比较了HIIE与运动量匹配的MIE对青少年男性葡萄糖耐量、胰岛素敏感性(IS)、静息脂肪氧化和运动愉悦感的急性影响。
采用平衡实验条件的组内测量设计。
9名男孩(14.2±0.4岁)在不同日期以平衡顺序完成三种条件:(1)HIIE;(2)在自行车测力计上进行运动量匹配的MIE;(3)休息(CON)。运动或休息后进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT),计算血浆[葡萄糖]和[胰岛素]的曲线下面积(AUC)反应,并估算IS(Cederholm指数)。OGTT后使用间接量热法测量能量消耗和脂肪氧化。使用身体活动愉悦感量表评估运动愉悦感。
与CON相比,MIE(-23.9%,P = 0.013,效应量[ES] = -0.64)和HIIE(-28.9%,P = 0.008,ES = -0.84)后血浆[葡萄糖]的增量AUC(iAUC)均降低。与CON相比,HIIE(-24.2%,P = 0.021,ES = -0.71)和MIE(-29.1%,P = 0.012,ES = -0.79)后血浆[胰岛素]的iAUC较低。HIIE后IS增加11.2%(P = 0.03,ES = 0.76),MIE后增加8.4%(P = 0.10,ES = 0.58)。HIIE后脂肪氧化有增加趋势(P = 0.097,ES = 0.70)。HIIE和MIE的愉悦感评分相同(P>0.05,ES<0.01)。
单次高效省时的HIIE是MIE的有效替代方案,可在运动后立即改善青少年男性的葡萄糖耐量和IS。