Brand John, Oriet Chris, Johnson Aaron P, Wolfe Jeremy M
Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Canada.
Department of Psychology, University of Regina, Canada.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Nov;153:129-38. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
Hodsoll and Humphreys (2001) have assessed the relative contributions of stimulus-driven and user-driven knowledge on linearly- and nonlinearly separable searches. However, the target feature used to determine linear separability in their task (i.e., target size) was required to locate the target. In the present work, we investigated the contributions of stimulus-driven and user-driven knowledge when a linearly- or a nonlinearly-separable feature is available but not required for target identification. We asked observers to complete a series of standard color×orientation conjunction searches in which target size was either linearly- or nonlinearly separable from the size of the distractors. When guidance by color×orientation and guidance by size information are both available, observers rely on whichever information results in the best search efficiency. This is the case irrespective of whether we provide target foreknowledge by blocking stimulus conditions, suggesting that feature information is used in both a stimulus-driven and a user-driven fashion.
霍德索尔和汉弗莱斯(2001年)评估了刺激驱动知识和用户驱动知识在线性可分搜索和非线性可分搜索中的相对贡献。然而,他们任务中用于确定线性可分性的目标特征(即目标大小)是定位目标所必需的。在本研究中,我们调查了在存在线性或非线性可分特征但目标识别不需要该特征时,刺激驱动知识和用户驱动知识的贡献。我们要求观察者完成一系列标准的颜色×方向联合搜索任务,其中目标大小与干扰项大小要么是线性可分的,要么是非线性可分的。当颜色×方向引导和大小信息引导都可用时,观察者会依赖能带来最佳搜索效率的任何一种信息。无论我们是通过阻断刺激条件来提供目标先验知识,情况都是如此,这表明特征信息是以刺激驱动和用户驱动两种方式被使用的。