Loeb Stacy, Sanda Martin G, Broyles Dennis L, Shin Sanghyuk S, Bangma Chris H, Wei John T, Partin Alan W, Klee George G, Slawin Kevin M, Marks Leonard S, van Schaik Ron H N, Chan Daniel W, Sokoll Lori J, Cruz Amabelle B, Mizrahi Isaac A, Catalona William J
Department of Urology and Population Health, New York University, New York, New York.
Department of Urology, Emory University and Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia.
J Urol. 2015 Apr;193(4):1163-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.121. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
The Prostate Health Index (phi) is a new test combining total, free and [-2]proPSA into a single score. It was recently approved by the FDA and is now commercially available in the U.S., Europe and Australia. We investigate whether phi improves specificity for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer and can help reduce prostate cancer over diagnosis.
From a multicenter prospective trial we identified 658 men age 50 years or older with prostate specific antigen 4 to 10 ng/ml and normal digital rectal examination who underwent prostate biopsy. In this population we compared the performance of prostate specific antigen, % free prostate specific antigen, [-2]proPSA and phi to predict biopsy results and, specifically, the presence of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiple criteria.
The Prostate Health Index was significantly higher in men with Gleason 7 or greater and "Epstein significant" cancer. On receiver operating characteristic analysis phi had the highest AUC for overall prostate cancer (AUCs phi 0.708, percent free prostate specific antigen 0.648, [-2]proPSA 0.550 and prostate specific antigen 0.516), Gleason 7 or greater (AUCs phi 0.707, percent free prostate specific antigen 0.661, [-2]proPSA 0.558, prostate specific antigen 0.551) and significant prostate cancer (AUCs phi 0.698, percent free prostate specific antigen 0.654, [-2]proPSA 0.550, prostate specific antigen 0.549). At the 90% sensitivity cut point for phi (a score less than 28.6) 30.1% of patients could have been spared an unnecessary biopsy for benign disease or insignificant prostate cancer compared to 21.7% using percent free prostate specific antigen.
The new phi test outperforms its individual components of total, free and [-2]proPSA for the identification of clinically significant prostate cancer. Phi may be useful as part of a multivariable approach to reduce prostate biopsies and over diagnosis.
前列腺健康指数(phi)是一项新的检测,它将总前列腺特异性抗原、游离前列腺特异性抗原和[-2]前列腺特异性抗原组合成一个单一分数。该检测最近获得了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的批准,目前在美国、欧洲和澳大利亚均可商业化使用。我们研究phi是否能提高检测临床显著性前列腺癌的特异性,并有助于减少前列腺癌的过度诊断。
从一项多中心前瞻性试验中,我们确定了658名年龄在50岁及以上、前列腺特异性抗原为4至10 ng/ml且直肠指检正常的男性,这些男性均接受了前列腺活检。在这一人群中,我们比较了前列腺特异性抗原、游离前列腺特异性抗原百分比、[-2]前列腺特异性抗原和phi预测活检结果的性能,特别是使用多种标准来判断临床显著性前列腺癌的存在情况。
Gleason评分7分及以上和“爱泼斯坦显著性”癌症患者的前列腺健康指数显著更高。在受试者工作特征分析中,phi在总体前列腺癌(phi的曲线下面积为0.708,游离前列腺特异性抗原百分比为0.648,[-2]前列腺特异性抗原为0.550,前列腺特异性抗原为0.516)、Gleason评分7分及以上(phi的曲线下面积为0.707,游离前列腺特异性抗原百分比为0.661,[-2]前列腺特异性抗原为0.558,前列腺特异性抗原为0.551)以及显著性前列腺癌(phi的曲线下面积为0.698,游离前列腺特异性抗原百分比为0.654,[-2]前列腺特异性抗原为0.550,前列腺特异性抗原为0.549)方面具有最高的曲线下面积。在phi的90%敏感性切点(分数低于28.6)时,与使用游离前列腺特异性抗原百分比时的21.7%相比,30.1%的患者可以避免因良性疾病或非显著性前列腺癌而进行不必要的活检。
新的phi检测在识别临床显著性前列腺癌方面优于其总前列腺特异性抗原、游离前列腺特异性抗原和[-2]前列腺特异性抗原的各个组成部分。Phi作为多变量方法的一部分,可能有助于减少前列腺活检和过度诊断。