• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经颅磁刺激治疗难治性抑郁症中采用间歇性 theta 爆发刺激与常规重复经颅磁刺激的比较:成本分析。

Implementation of intermittent theta burst stimulation compared to conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment resistant depression: A cost analysis.

机构信息

Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Institute for Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Sep 12;14(9):e0222546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222546. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0222546
PMID:31513675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6742475/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an evidence-based treatment for depression that is increasingly implemented in healthcare systems across the world. A new form of rTMS called intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can be delivered in 3 min and has demonstrated comparable effectiveness to the conventional 37.5 min 10Hz rTMS protocol in patients with depression.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the direct treatment costs per course and per remission for iTBS compared to 10Hz rTMS treatment in depression.

METHODS

We conducted a cost analysis from a healthcare system perspective using patient-level data from a large randomized non-inferiority trial (THREE-D). Depressed adults 18 to 65 received either 10Hz rTMS or iTBS treatment. Treatment costs were calculated using direct healthcare costs associated with equipment, coils, physician assessments and technician time over the course of treatment. Cost per remission was estimated using the proportion of patients achieving remission following treatment. Deterministic sensitivity analyses and non-parametric bootstrapping was used to estimate uncertainty.

RESULTS

From a healthcare system perspective, the average cost per patient was USD$1,108 (SD 166) for a course of iTBS and $1,844 (SD 304) for 10Hz rTMS, with an incremental net savings of $735 (95% CI 688 to 783). The average cost per remission was $3,695 (SD 552) for iTBS and $6,146 (SD 1,015) for 10Hz rTMS, with an average incremental net savings of $2,451 (95% CI 2,293 to 2,610).

CONCLUSIONS

The shorter session durations and treatment capacity increase associated with 3 min iTBS translate into significant cost-savings per patient and per remission when compared to 10Hz rTMS.

摘要

背景

重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)是一种有循证医学证据的抑郁症治疗方法,在世界范围内的医疗系统中得到了越来越多的应用。一种新的 rTMS 形式,即间歇性 theta 爆发刺激(iTBS),可以在 3 分钟内完成,并且在抑郁症患者中已经证明与传统的 10Hz rTMS 方案具有相当的疗效。

目的

比较 iTBS 与 10Hz rTMS 治疗抑郁症的每疗程和每缓解的直接治疗成本。

方法

我们从医疗保健系统的角度进行了成本分析,使用了来自一项大型随机非劣效性试验(THREE-D)的患者水平数据。18 至 65 岁的抑郁症成年人接受了 10Hz rTMS 或 iTBS 治疗。治疗成本是根据治疗过程中与设备、线圈、医生评估和技术人员时间相关的直接医疗成本计算的。使用治疗后达到缓解的患者比例来估计每缓解的成本。使用确定性敏感性分析和非参数引导法来估计不确定性。

结果

从医疗保健系统的角度来看,iTBS 一个疗程的平均每位患者成本为 1108 美元(SD 166),而 10Hz rTMS 为 1844 美元(SD 304),增量净节省 735 美元(95%CI 688 美元至 783 美元)。iTBS 每缓解的平均成本为 3695 美元(SD 552),而 10Hz rTMS 为 6146 美元(SD 1015),平均增量净节省 2451 美元(95%CI 2293 美元至 2610 美元)。

结论

与 10Hz rTMS 相比,3 分钟 iTBS 的较短治疗时间和增加的治疗能力,每疗程和每缓解的成本都显著降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82a9/6742475/cd3134776ac8/pone.0222546.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82a9/6742475/f3a62917883e/pone.0222546.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82a9/6742475/cd3134776ac8/pone.0222546.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82a9/6742475/f3a62917883e/pone.0222546.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/82a9/6742475/cd3134776ac8/pone.0222546.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation of intermittent theta burst stimulation compared to conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with treatment resistant depression: A cost analysis.经颅磁刺激治疗难治性抑郁症中采用间歇性 theta 爆发刺激与常规重复经颅磁刺激的比较:成本分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 12;14(9):e0222546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222546. eCollection 2019.
2
Effectiveness of theta burst versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression (THREE-D): a randomised non-inferiority trial.theta 爆发刺激与高频重复经颅磁刺激治疗抑郁症的疗效比较(THREE-D):一项随机非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 28;391(10131):1683-1692. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30295-2. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
3
Efficacy of intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) and 10-Hz high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treatment-resistant unipolar depression: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.间歇性theta波爆发刺激(iTBS)和10赫兹高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗难治性单相抑郁症的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Jan 13;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1764-8.
4
rTMS of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex for major depression: safety, tolerability, effectiveness, and outcome predictors for 10 Hz versus intermittent theta-burst stimulation.背内侧前额叶皮质重复经颅磁刺激治疗重度抑郁症:10赫兹与间歇性theta爆发刺激的安全性、耐受性、有效性及结果预测因素
Brain Stimul. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):208-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
5
Accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation treatment in medication-resistant major depression: A fast road to remission?加速间歇性θ波爆发刺激治疗难治性重度抑郁症:通往缓解的快速通道?
J Affect Disord. 2016 Aug;200:6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
6
A randomized sham-controlled trial of high-dosage accelerated intermittent theta burst rTMS in major depression: study protocol.一项大剂量加速间歇 theta 爆破经颅磁刺激治疗重性抑郁的随机假刺激对照试验:研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 8;24(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05470-9.
7
Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) versus 10 Hz high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to alleviate treatment-resistant unipolar depression: A randomized controlled trial (THETA-DEP).经颅磁刺激治疗难治性单相抑郁的随机对照试验(THETA-DEP):间歇性 theta 爆发刺激(iTBS)与 10 Hz 高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)的比较。
Brain Stimul. 2022 May-Jun;15(3):870-880. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.05.011. Epub 2022 May 21.
8
Impact of prior treatment on remission with intermittent theta burst versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment resistant depression.间歇 theta 爆发刺激与高频重复经颅磁刺激治疗难治性抑郁症时既往治疗的影响。
Brain Stimul. 2019 Nov-Dec;12(6):1553-1555. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.07.011. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation versus Antidepressant Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression.重复经颅磁刺激与抗抑郁药治疗难治性抑郁症的成本效益分析
Value Health. 2015 Jul;18(5):597-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.04.004.
10
Cost-utility analysis of curative and maintenance repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment-resistant unipolar depression: a randomized controlled trial protocol.治疗抵抗性单相抑郁症的根治性和维持性重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)的成本效用分析:一项随机对照试验方案
Trials. 2020 Apr 5;21(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04255-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Preliminary study on the efficacy of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) in adolescents with affective disorders, with and without antidepressants.间歇性theta爆发刺激(iTBS)对伴有或不伴有抗抑郁药的情感障碍青少年疗效的初步研究。
Gen Psychiatr. 2025 May 13;38(3):e101943. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2024-101943. eCollection 2025.
2
The effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) on resting-state brain entropy (BEN).间歇性θ波爆发刺激(iTBS)对静息态脑熵(BEN)的影响。
Neurotherapeutics. 2025 Apr;22(3):e00556. doi: 10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00556. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of rTMS as a Next Step in Antidepressant Non-Responders: A Randomized Comparison With Current Antidepressant Treatment Approaches.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of theta burst versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with depression (THREE-D): a randomised non-inferiority trial.theta 爆发刺激与高频重复经颅磁刺激治疗抑郁症的疗效比较(THREE-D):一项随机非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2018 Apr 28;391(10131):1683-1692. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30295-2. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
2
Adverse effects of electroconvulsive therapy on cognitive performance.电休克治疗对认知功能的不良影响。
Ment Illn. 2017 Oct 19;9(2):7181. doi: 10.4081/mi.2017.7181.
3
Consensus Recommendations for the Clinical Application of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the Treatment of Depression.
重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)作为抗抑郁药无反应者下一步治疗方法的成本效益:与当前抗抑郁治疗方法的随机对照比较
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2024 Dec 22;151(5):613-24. doi: 10.1111/acps.13782.
4
The cerebral and cognitive changes after intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) treatment for depression: study protocol for a randomized double-blind sham-controlled trial.经颅磁刺激(TMS)治疗抑郁症后脑和认知变化:一项随机双盲假刺激对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Nov 11;25(1):752. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08606-8.
5
Association between rTMS-induced changes in inflammatory markers and improvement in psychiatric diseases: a systematic review.重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)引起的炎症标志物变化与精神疾病改善之间的关联:一项系统综述
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 27;23(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12991-024-00514-0.
6
Changes in pain following bilateral intermittent theta-burst, transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression: A retrospective chart review.双侧间歇性θ波爆发式经颅磁刺激治疗抑郁症后疼痛的变化:一项回顾性图表审查。
Can J Pain. 2024 Jan 12;8(1):2300026. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2023.2300026. eCollection 2024.
7
Increasing striatal dopamine release through repeated bouts of theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. A 18F-desmethoxyfallypride positron emission tomography study.通过对左侧背外侧前额叶皮层进行重复的theta爆发式经颅磁刺激来增加纹状体多巴胺释放。一项18F-去甲氧基氟哌啶正电子发射断层扫描研究。
Front Neurosci. 2024 Jan 18;17:1295151. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1295151. eCollection 2023.
8
Efficacy of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) on post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI): a systematic review and meta-analysis.经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中后认知障碍的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurol Sci. 2024 May;45(5):2107-2118. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-07267-w. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
9
Intermittent tetraburst stimulation combined with transcranial direct current stimulation once weekly for treatment-resistant depression: a case report.每周一次间歇性四串刺激联合经颅直流电刺激治疗难治性抑郁症:病例报告。
J Med Case Rep. 2023 Oct 2;17(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s13256-023-04152-0.
10
Neuromodulation for treatment-resistant depression: Functional network targets contributing to antidepressive outcomes.用于治疗抵抗性抑郁症的神经调节:促成抗抑郁结果的功能网络靶点。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Mar 2;17:1125074. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1125074. eCollection 2023.
《重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗抑郁症临床应用的专家共识建议》
J Clin Psychiatry. 2018 Jan/Feb;79(1). doi: 10.4088/JCP.16cs10905.
4
Depression Is the Leading Cause of Disability Around the World.抑郁症是全球致残的主要原因。
JAMA. 2017 Apr 18;317(15):1517. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3826.
5
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Acute Treatment of Major Depressive Episodes: A Systematic Review With Network Meta-analysis.重复经颅磁刺激治疗急性重性抑郁发作的系统评价与网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 1;74(2):143-152. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3644.
6
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: an emerging treatment for medication-resistant depression.重复经颅磁刺激:一种治疗难治性抑郁症的新兴疗法。
CMAJ. 2016 Nov 1;188(16):1175-1177. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151316. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
7
Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 4. Neurostimulation Treatments.加拿大情绪与焦虑治疗网络(CANMAT)2016年成人重度抑郁症管理临床指南:第4节。神经刺激治疗
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;61(9):561-75. doi: 10.1177/0706743716660033. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
8
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: An Economic Analysis.重复经颅磁刺激治疗难治性抑郁症的经济学分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Mar 1;16(6):1-51. eCollection 2016.
9
Accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation treatment in medication-resistant major depression: A fast road to remission?加速间歇性θ波爆发刺激治疗难治性重度抑郁症:通往缓解的快速通道?
J Affect Disord. 2016 Aug;200:6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
10
rTMS of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex for major depression: safety, tolerability, effectiveness, and outcome predictors for 10 Hz versus intermittent theta-burst stimulation.背内侧前额叶皮质重复经颅磁刺激治疗重度抑郁症:10赫兹与间歇性theta爆发刺激的安全性、耐受性、有效性及结果预测因素
Brain Stimul. 2015 Mar-Apr;8(2):208-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 6.