Eikmeier Verena, Hoppe Dorothée, Ulrich Rolf
Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Schleichstr. 4, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Schleichstr. 4, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Mar;156:162-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
Previous studies reported a space-time congruency effect on response time, supporting the notion that people's thinking about time is grounded in their spatial sensorimotor experience. According to a strong view of metaphoric mapping, the congruency effect should be larger for responses that differ in their spatial features than for responses that lack such differences. In contrast, a weaker version of this account posits that the grounding of time is based on higher-level spatial concepts. In this case, response mode should not modulate the size of the space-time congruency effect. In order to assess these predictions, participants in this study responded to temporal stimuli either manually or vocally. Response mode did not modulate the space-time congruency effect which supports the weaker view of metaphoric mapping suggesting that this effect emerges at a higher cognitive level.
先前的研究报告了时空一致性对反应时间的影响,支持了人们对时间的思考基于其空间感觉运动体验这一观点。根据隐喻映射的一种强烈观点,对于在空间特征上存在差异的反应,一致性效应应该比对缺乏此类差异的反应更大。相比之下,该观点的一个较弱版本假定时间的基础基于更高级别的空间概念。在这种情况下,反应模式不应调节时空一致性效应的大小。为了评估这些预测,本研究中的参与者通过手动或口头方式对时间刺激做出反应。反应模式并未调节时空一致性效应,这支持了隐喻映射的较弱观点,表明这种效应出现在更高的认知水平。