Suppr超能文献

猴子会用隐喻思考吗?猴子和人类对空间和时间的表述。

Do monkeys think in metaphors? Representations of space and time in monkeys and humans.

机构信息

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Box 90999, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 2010 Nov;117(2):191-202. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.011. Epub 2010 Sep 16.

Abstract

Research on the relationship between the representation of space and time has produced two contrasting proposals. ATOM posits that space and time are represented via a common magnitude system, suggesting a symmetrical relationship between space and time. According to metaphor theory, however, representations of time depend on representations of space asymmetrically. Previous findings in humans have supported metaphor theory. Here, we investigate the relationship between time and space in a nonverbal species, by testing whether non-human primates show space-time interactions consistent with metaphor theory or with ATOM. We tested two rhesus monkeys and 16 adult humans in a nonverbal task that assessed the influence of an irrelevant dimension (time or space) on a relevant dimension (space or time). In humans, spatial extent had a large effect on time judgments whereas time had a small effect on spatial judgments. In monkeys, both spatial and temporal manipulations showed large bi-directional effects on judgments. In contrast to humans, spatial manipulations in monkeys did not produce a larger effect on temporal judgments than the reverse. Thus, consistent with previous findings, human adults showed asymmetrical space-time interactions that were predicted by metaphor theory. In contrast, monkeys showed patterns that were more consistent with ATOM.

摘要

关于时空表现的研究提出了两个相互矛盾的观点。ATOM 假设时空是通过一个共同的量值系统来表示的,这表明时空之间存在着对称关系。然而,根据隐喻理论,时间的表示方式与空间不对称地相关。之前在人类身上的研究结果支持了隐喻理论。在这里,我们通过测试非语言物种(猕猴)是否表现出与隐喻理论或 ATOM 一致的时空相互作用,来研究时空关系。我们在一个非语言任务中测试了两只猕猴和 16 名成年人类,该任务评估了一个不相关维度(时间或空间)对一个相关维度(空间或时间)的影响。在人类中,空间范围对时间判断的影响较大,而时间对空间判断的影响较小。在猴子中,空间和时间的操作都对判断产生了大的双向影响。与人类不同的是,猴子的空间操作对时间判断的影响并不大于相反的情况。因此,与之前的发现一致,成年人类表现出与隐喻理论预测一致的非对称时空相互作用。相比之下,猴子表现出的模式与 ATOM 更为一致。

相似文献

1
Do monkeys think in metaphors? Representations of space and time in monkeys and humans.
Cognition. 2010 Nov;117(2):191-202. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.011. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
2
Of magnitudes and metaphors: explaining cognitive interactions between space, time, and number.
Cortex. 2015 Mar;64:209-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.10.015. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
3
Response mode does not modulate the space-time congruency effect: evidence for a space-time mapping at a conceptual level.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Mar;156:162-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
4
The relationship between space and time perception: A registered replication of Casasanto and Boroditsky (2008).
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Aug;86(6):2210-2218. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02942-2. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
5
The relationship between space and time perception: A registered replication of Casasanto and Boroditsky (2008).
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Feb;84(2):347-351. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02420-z. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
6
Time in the mind: using space to think about time.
Cognition. 2008 Feb;106(2):579-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004. Epub 2007 May 16.
7
Can conceptual congruency effects between number, time, and space be accounted for by polarity correspondence?
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Mar;156:179-91. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.016. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
8
Space-time compatibility effects in the auditory modality.
Exp Psychol. 2011;59(2):82-7. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000129.
10
The A Theory Of Magnitude (ATOM) model in temporal perception and reproduction tasks.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Jan;139(1):111-23. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.09.006. Epub 2011 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural networks underlying magnitude perception: a specific meta-analysis of fMRI studies.
Cereb Cortex. 2025 Jul 1;35(7). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaf163.
2
Presentation time shapes perceived room size in visual and auditory modalities.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Jun 15;10(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00644-3.
3
Space-time interference between the length and duration of static lines.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May 27. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03093-8.
4
Issues in Grounded Cognition and How to Solve Them - the Minimalist Account.
J Cogn. 2025 Apr 21;8(1):31. doi: 10.5334/joc.444. eCollection 2025.
5
Vestibular stimulation and space-time interaction affect the perception of time during whole-body rotations.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 15;20(1):e0313219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313219. eCollection 2025.
6
Diverse Time Encoding Strategies Within the Medial Premotor Areas of the Primate.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1455:117-140. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-60183-5_7.
7
Transfer from continuous to discrete quantities in honeybees.
iScience. 2023 Sep 27;26(10):108035. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108035. eCollection 2023 Oct 20.
8
Gradient Organization of Space, Time, and Numbers in the Brain: A Meta-analysis of Neuroimaging Studies.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Sep;34(3):721-737. doi: 10.1007/s11065-023-09609-z. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
9
On the interplay between time and space perception in discontinuous stimulus displays.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Oct;85(7):2406-2421. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02678-5. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
10
Mice make temporal inferences about novel locations based on previously learned spatiotemporal contingencies.
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jun;26(3):771-779. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01715-4. Epub 2022 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Space and Time in the Child's Mind: Evidence for a Cross-Dimensional Asymmetry.
Cogn Sci. 2010 Apr;34(3):387-405. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01094.x.
2
Good and bad in the hands of politicians: spontaneous gestures during positive and negative speech.
PLoS One. 2010 Jul 28;5(7):e11805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011805.
4
Embodiment of abstract concepts: good and bad in right- and left-handers.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Aug;138(3):351-67. doi: 10.1037/a0015854.
5
Evidence for remembering when events occurred in a rodent model of episodic memory.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jun 9;106(23):9525-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904360106. Epub 2009 May 20.
6
Memory for "what", "where", and "when" information in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Apr;35(2):143-52. doi: 10.1037/a0013295.
7
Spontaneous planning for future stone throwing by a male chimpanzee.
Curr Biol. 2009 Mar 10;19(5):R190-1. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.010.
8
Beyond the number domain.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Feb;13(2):83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.007. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
10
Similarity and proximity: when does close in space mean close in mind?
Mem Cognit. 2008 Sep;36(6):1047-56. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.6.1047.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验