Kriza Christine, Hanass-Hancock Jill, Odame Emmanuel Ankrah, Deghaye Nicola, Aman Rashid, Wahlster Philip, Marin Mayra, Gebe Nicodemus, Akhwale Willis, Wachsmuth Isabelle, Kolominsky-Rabas Peter L
Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Public Health (IZPH), University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schwabachanlage 6, Erlangen 91054, Germany.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Dec 2;12:66. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-66.
Health technology assessment (HTA) is mostly used in the context of high- and middle-income countries. Many "resource-poor" settings, which have the greatest need for critical assessment of health technology, have a limited basis for making evidence-based choices. This can lead to inappropriate use of technologies, a problem that could be addressed by HTA that enables the efficient use of resources, which is especially crucial in such settings. There is a lack of clarity about which HTA tools should be used in these settings. This research aims to provide an overview of proposed HTA tools for "resource-poor" settings with a specific focus on sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).
A systematic review was conducted using basic steps from the PRISMA guidelines. Studies that described HTA tools applicable for "resource-limited" settings were identified and critically appraised. Only papers published between 2003 and 2013 were included. The identified tools were assessed according to a checklist with methodological criteria.
Six appropriate tools that are applicable in the SSA setting and cover methodological robustness and ease of use were included in the review. Several tools fulfil these criteria, such as the KNOW ESSENTIALS tool, Mini-HTA tool, and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis but their application in the SSA context remains limited. The WHO CHOICE method is a standardized decision making tool for choosing interventions but is limited to their cost-effectiveness. Most evaluation of health technology in SSA focuses on priority setting. There is a lack of HTA tools that can be used for the systematic assessment of technology in the SSA context.
An appropriate HTA tool for "resource-constrained" settings, and especially SSA, should address all important criteria of decision making. By combining the two most promising tools, KNOW ESSENTIALS and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, appropriate analysis of evidence with a robust and flexible methodology could be applied for the SSA setting.
卫生技术评估(HTA)大多应用于高收入和中等收入国家。许多最需要对卫生技术进行严格评估的“资源匮乏”地区,在做出基于证据的选择方面基础有限。这可能导致技术的不当使用,而HTA能够解决这一问题,它有助于资源的有效利用,这在这类地区尤为关键。对于在这些地区应使用哪些HTA工具,目前尚不清楚。本研究旨在概述针对“资源匮乏”地区,特别是撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)所提议的HTA工具。
采用PRISMA指南的基本步骤进行系统综述。识别并严格评估描述适用于“资源有限”地区的HTA工具的研究。仅纳入2003年至2013年发表的论文。根据具有方法学标准的清单对识别出的工具进行评估。
该综述纳入了六种适用于SSA地区且涵盖方法稳健性和易用性的合适工具。有几种工具符合这些标准,如“了解要点”工具、小型HTA工具和多标准决策分析,但它们在SSA背景下的应用仍然有限。世界卫生组织的CHOICE方法是一种用于选择干预措施的标准化决策工具,但仅限于成本效益方面。SSA地区的大多数卫生技术评估侧重于确定优先事项。缺乏可用于在SSA背景下对技术进行系统评估的HTA工具。
适用于“资源受限”地区,特别是SSA的合适HTA工具应涵盖决策的所有重要标准。通过结合最有前景的两种工具“了解要点”和多标准决策分析,可以采用稳健且灵活的方法对SSA地区的证据进行适当分析。