Suppr超能文献

非体外循环与体外循环冠状动脉内膜切除术治疗弥漫性冠状动脉疾病患者的比较:早期和中期结果

Comparison of off-pump and on-pump coronary endarterectomy for patients with diffusely diseased coronary arteries: early and midterm outcome.

作者信息

Qiu Zhibing, Chen Xin, Jiang YingShou, Wang LiMing, Xu Ming, Huang Fuhua, Shi Hongwei, Zhang Cui

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Heart Institute, 68 Changle Rd, 210006, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Dec 4;9:186. doi: 10.1186/s13019-014-0186-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coronary endarterectomy (CE) is an alternative for the diffusely diseased left anterior descending (LAD), but its mid and long term results are largely questionable. This study is to compare the early to mid-term results between off-pump and on-pump coronary endarterectomy with coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

212 consecutive patients underwent CE and bypass grafting for diffusely diseased LAD. Ninety-two patients undergoing CE with off-pump (group off-pump) were compared with 120 patients undergoing CE with on-pump (group on-pump). The main preference for selection to an off-pump CE surgery were the preoperative high risk factors, especially previous cerebrovascular accident、chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)、calcified ascending aorta and right coronary artery (RCA) critical stenosis >90%.

RESULTS

There were three deaths in this group with total operative mortality of 1.4%. The perioperative mortality of group off-pump (1.1%) was similar with that of group on-pump (1.7%). The postoperative myocardial infarctions rate was 2.8%. There was no significant difference as for the morbidity between the group off-pump and group on-pump. Among survivors, the patency rate of the LIMA-LAD anastomosis was 89.4%. There was no difference as for the grafts patency rate between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier survival revealed no significant difference between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier freedom from cardiac events requiring hospital re-admission and angina recurrence were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

On-pump or off-pump CE is a good technique with the same early and mid-term outcomes. In the series of off-pump CE, we have shown that the effect of OPCABG with CE appears to be durable, and mid-term clinical outcomes are encouraging. Despite the higher risk profile, hospital mortality and major complications in our study are comparable to those for CCE.

摘要

背景

冠状动脉内膜切除术(CE)是弥漫性病变的左前降支(LAD)的一种替代治疗方法,但其中长期效果存在很大疑问。本研究旨在比较非体外循环和体外循环冠状动脉内膜切除术联合冠状动脉旁路移植术的早期至中期结果。

方法

212例连续患者因弥漫性LAD病变接受了CE和旁路移植术。将92例行非体外循环CE手术的患者(非体外循环组)与120例行体外循环CE手术的患者(体外循环组)进行比较。选择非体外循环CE手术的主要偏好因素为术前高危因素,尤其是既往脑血管意外、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、升主动脉钙化和右冠状动脉(RCA)严重狭窄>90%。

结果

该组有3例死亡,总手术死亡率为1.4%。非体外循环组的围手术期死亡率(1.1%)与体外循环组(1.7%)相似。术后心肌梗死发生率为2.8%。非体外循环组和体外循环组之间的发病率无显著差异。在存活者中,左内乳动脉-左前降支吻合口通畅率为89.4%。两组之间的移植血管通畅率无差异。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示两组之间无显著差异。两组Kaplan-Meier无需要再次住院的心脏事件和心绞痛复发的情况相似。

结论

体外循环或非体外循环CE是一种良好的技术,具有相同的早期和中期结果。在非体外循环CE系列中,我们已经表明非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术联合CE的效果似乎是持久的,中期临床结果令人鼓舞。尽管风险较高,但我们研究中的医院死亡率和主要并发症与常规冠状动脉内膜切除术相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d07/4266222/20c30f46c1ee/13019_2014_Article_186_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验