Kapil Richa, Press Christen G, Hwang M Lisa, Brown LaDraka, Geisler William M
Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Feb;53(2):546-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02483-14. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
Repeat Chlamydia trachomatis detection frequently occurs within months after C. trachomatis infection treatment. The origins of such infection (persistence versus reinfection from untreated or new partners) are varied and difficult to determine. C. trachomatis strains can be differentiated by sequencing the ompA gene encoding the outer membrane protein A (OmpA). We used OmpA genotyping to investigate the epidemiology of repeat C. trachomatis detection after treatment in C. trachomatis-infected subjects seen at a sexually transmitted diseases clinic. Subjects were enrolled, tested for C. trachomatis, treated with azithromycin, and scheduled for a 6-month follow-up for repeat C. trachomatis testing. OmpA genotyping was performed on C. trachomatis-positive urogenital specimens obtained from patients at enrollment and follow-up. The enrollment visit OmpA genotypes for C. trachomatis were determined for 162 subjects (92% female, 94% African American). C. trachomatis was detected at follow-up in 39 subjects (24%). The OmpA genotype distribution at enrollment did not differ in those with versus those without repeat C. trachomatis detection. Of the 35 subjects with C. trachomatis strains genotyped at enrollment and follow-up, 7 (20%) had the same ompA sequence at both visits, while 28 (80%) had discordant sequences. A new sexual partner was reported more often in subjects with discordant C. trachomatis strains than in those with concordant strains (13 [46%] versus 1 [14%]; P = 0.195). Half of the subjects with discordant C. trachomatis strains who reported sexual activity since treatment denied a new sexual partner; 62% of these subjects reported that their partner was treated. Our study demonstrates that most repeat C. trachomatis detections after treatment were new infections with a different C. trachomatis strain rather than reinfection with the same strain. OmpA genotyping can be a useful tool in understanding the origins of repeat C. trachomatis detection after treatment.
沙眼衣原体感染治疗后的数月内,常出现重复沙眼衣原体检测阳性的情况。此类感染的源头(持续感染与来自未治疗的伴侣或新伴侣的再次感染)各不相同,且难以确定。通过对编码外膜蛋白A(OmpA)的ompA基因进行测序,可区分沙眼衣原体菌株。我们利用OmpA基因分型,对一家性传播疾病诊所中沙眼衣原体感染患者治疗后重复沙眼衣原体检测阳性的流行病学情况进行了调查。研究招募了受试者,对其进行沙眼衣原体检测,用阿奇霉素进行治疗,并安排在6个月后进行重复沙眼衣原体检测随访。对受试者入组时及随访时获得的沙眼衣原体阳性泌尿生殖系统标本进行OmpA基因分型。确定了162名受试者(92%为女性,94%为非裔美国人)入组时沙眼衣原体的OmpA基因型。39名受试者(24%)在随访时检测到沙眼衣原体。重复沙眼衣原体检测阳性者与未检测到者入组时的OmpA基因型分布无差异。在35名入组时及随访时进行了沙眼衣原体菌株基因分型的受试者中,7名(20%)在两次检测时具有相同的ompA序列,而28名(80%)序列不一致。沙眼衣原体菌株序列不一致的受试者比序列一致的受试者更常报告有新的性伴侣(13名[46%]对1名[14%];P = 0.195)。在报告治疗后有性活动的沙眼衣原体菌株序列不一致的受试者中,一半否认有新的性伴侣;这些受试者中有62%报告其伴侣接受了治疗。我们的研究表明,治疗后大多数重复沙眼衣原体检测阳性是感染了不同的沙眼衣原体菌株,而非同一菌株的再次感染。OmpA基因分型可能是了解治疗后重复沙眼衣原体检测阳性源头的有用工具。