• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Neonatal euthanasia: The Groningen Protocol.新生儿安乐死:《格罗宁根议定书》
Linacre Q. 2014 Nov;81(4):388-92. doi: 10.1179/0024363914Z.00000000086.
2
The Goals of Medicine and Compassion in the Ethical Assessment of Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide: Relieving Pain and Suffering by Protecting, Promoting, and Maintaining the Person's Well-Being.医学目的与安乐死和医师协助自杀的伦理评估中的同情:通过保护、增进和维护人的福祉来缓解疼痛和苦难。
J Palliat Care. 2022 Jul;37(3):366-371. doi: 10.1177/08258597221078371. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
3
Involuntary euthanasia of severely ill newborns: is the Groningen Protocol really dangerous?严重患病新生儿的非自愿安乐死:格罗宁根方案真的危险吗?
Hippokratia. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):193-203.
4
Voluntary euthanasia in Northern Ireland: general practitioners' beliefs, experiences, and actions.北爱尔兰的自愿安乐死:全科医生的信念、经历及行为
Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Oct;50(459):794-7.
5
Quality of life and myelomeningocele: an ethical and evidence-based analysis of the Groningen Protocol.
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2010;46(6):409-14. doi: 10.1159/000322895. Epub 2011 May 3.
6
To die with dignity: comparing physician assisted suicide in the United States, Japan, and the Netherlands.有尊严地死去:比较美国、日本和荷兰的医生协助自杀情况。
Wash Univ Law Q. 1996 Fall;74(3):803-40.
7
How then should we die?: California's "Death with Dignity" Act.那么我们应该如何面对死亡呢?加利福尼亚州的《尊严死亡法案》。
Med Etika Bioet. 2000 Spring;7(1-2):3-9.
8
[Euthanasia and medical act].[安乐死与医疗行为]
Rev Med Chil. 2011 May;139(5):642-54. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
9
[Interdisciplinary discussion about euthanasia--viewpoint of the clinical physicians].[关于安乐死的跨学科讨论——临床医生的观点]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 1999 Jul 22;88(29-30):1229-34.
10
[Euthanasia--a moral choice?].[安乐死——一种道德选择?]
Laeknabladid. 2007 Jul-Aug;93(7-8):543-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Catholic Perspective on Decision-Making for Critically Ill Newborns and Infants.天主教对危重新生儿和婴儿决策的观点。
Children (Basel). 2022 Feb 6;9(2):207. doi: 10.3390/children9020207.
2
US medical and surgical society position statements on physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia: a review.美国医学与外科学会关于医生协助自杀和安乐死的立场声明:一项综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Nov 3;21(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00556-5.
3
Decision making in neonatal end-of-life scenarios in low-income settings.低收入环境下新生儿临终场景中的决策制定。
Linacre Q. 2017 Aug;84(3):232-242. doi: 10.1080/00243639.2017.1300759. Epub 2017 May 31.
4
Euthanasia: Global Scenario and Its Status in India.安乐死:全球概况及其在印度的状况。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):349-360. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9946-7. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

本文引用的文献

1
How infants die in the neonatal intensive care unit: trends from 1999 through 2008.新生儿重症监护病房中婴儿的死亡方式:1999年至2008年的趋势
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Jul;165(7):630-4. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.102.
2
End-of-life decisions in Dutch neonatal intensive care units.荷兰新生儿重症监护病房中的临终决策。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Oct;163(10):895-901. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.166.
3
Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions.稀缺医疗干预措施的分配原则。
Lancet. 2009 Jan 31;373(9661):423-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60137-9.
4
Paediatric ethics: a repudiation of the Groningen protocol.儿科伦理学:对格罗宁根协议的驳斥。
Lancet. 2008 Mar 15;371(9616):892-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60402-x.
5
The Groningen protocol: another perspective.格罗宁根协议:另一种视角。
J Med Ethics. 2006 Mar;32(3):157-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.012476.
6
Medical end-of-life decisions made for neonates and infants in the Netherlands, 1995-2001.1995年至2001年荷兰针对新生儿和婴儿做出的医疗临终决定。
Lancet. 2005;365(9467):1329-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61030-6.
7
The Groningen protocol--euthanasia in severely ill newborns.格罗宁根方案——重症新生儿安乐死
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):959-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058026.
8
Euthanasia and palliative care in The Netherlands: an analysis of the latest developments.
Health Care Anal. 2004 Sep;12(3):195-207. doi: 10.1023/B:HCAN.0000044926.05523.ef.
9
Medical end-of-life decisions made for neonates and infants in the Netherlands.荷兰针对新生儿和婴儿做出的医疗临终决策。
Lancet. 1997 Jul 26;350(9073):251-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02315-5.

新生儿安乐死:《格罗宁根议定书》

Neonatal euthanasia: The Groningen Protocol.

作者信息

Vizcarrondo Felipe E

机构信息

Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, FL, USA.

出版信息

Linacre Q. 2014 Nov;81(4):388-92. doi: 10.1179/0024363914Z.00000000086.

DOI:10.1179/0024363914Z.00000000086
PMID:25473136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4240050/
Abstract

For the past thirty years, voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide of adult patients have been common practice in the Netherlands. Neonatal euthanasia was recently legalized in the Netherlands and the Groningen Protocol (GP) was developed to regulate the practice. Supporters claim compliance with the GP criteria makes neonatal euthanasia ethically permissible. An examination of the criteria used by the Protocol to justify the euthanasia of seriously ill neonates reveals the criteria are not based on firm moral principles. The taking of the life of a seriously ill person is not the solution to the pain and suffering of the dying process. It is the role of the medical professional to care for the ailing patient with love and compassion, always preserving the person's dignity. Neonatal euthanasia is not ethically permissible.

摘要

在过去三十年里,荷兰成年患者的自愿安乐死和医生协助自杀一直是常见做法。荷兰最近将新生儿安乐死合法化,并制定了《格罗宁根议定书》(GP)来规范这一行为。支持者声称,符合《格罗宁根议定书》标准使新生儿安乐死在伦理上是可允许的。对该议定书用于为重症新生儿安乐死辩护的标准进行审查后发现,这些标准并非基于坚定的道德原则。夺走重症患者的生命并非解决临终过程中的痛苦的办法。医疗专业人员的职责是以爱和同情照顾患病患者,始终维护患者的尊严。新生儿安乐死在伦理上是不允许的。