Suppr超能文献

天主教对危重新生儿和婴儿决策的观点。

Catholic Perspective on Decision-Making for Critically Ill Newborns and Infants.

作者信息

Friedrich Annie B, Eberl Jason T

机构信息

Bioethics Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA.

Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO 63104, USA.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2022 Feb 6;9(2):207. doi: 10.3390/children9020207.

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the foundational values informing the Catholic perspective on decision-making for critically ill newborns and infants, particularly focusing on the prudent use of medical technologies. Although the Church has consistently affirmed the general good of advances in scientific research and medicine, the technocratic paradigm of medicine may, particularly in cases with severely ill infants, lead to decision-making conflicts and breakdowns in communication between parents and providers. By exploring two paradigm cases, we offer specific practices in which providers can engage to connect with parents and avoid common technologically mediated decision-making conflicts. By focusing on the inherent relationality of all human persons, regardless of debility, and the Christian hope in the life to come, we can make decisions in the midst of the technocratic paradigm without succumbing to it.

摘要

在本文中,我们探讨了构成天主教对危重新生儿和婴儿决策观点基础的价值观,尤其着重于医疗技术的审慎使用。尽管教会一直肯定科学研究和医学进步的总体益处,但医学的技术官僚范式可能,特别是在患有重病婴儿的案例中,导致决策冲突以及父母与医疗服务提供者之间的沟通破裂。通过探究两个范例案例,我们提供了一些具体做法,医疗服务提供者可以借此与父母建立联系,并避免常见的由技术介导的决策冲突。通过关注所有人内在的关联性,无论其是否虚弱,以及对来世的基督教希望,我们能够在技术官僚范式中做出决策而不屈从于它。

相似文献

1
Catholic Perspective on Decision-Making for Critically Ill Newborns and Infants.
Children (Basel). 2022 Feb 6;9(2):207. doi: 10.3390/children9020207.
4
Decisions at the end of life: Catholic tradition.
Christ Bioeth. 1997 Dec;3(3):188-203. doi: 10.1093/cb/3.3.188.
5
The Catholic Church and reproductive health and rights in Timor-Leste: contestation, negotiation and cooperation.
Cult Health Sex. 2015;17(3):343-58. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2014.966255. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
8
Borderline viability resuscitation cases.
Med Etika Bioet. 2002;9(3-4):6-10.
10
The parent perspective: "being a good parent" when making critical decisions in the PICU.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 May;15(4):291-8. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000076.

本文引用的文献

1
New Developments in End-of-Life Teaching for Roman Catholic Healthcare: The Implications of ("The Good Samaritan").
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 May;39(5):501-503. doi: 10.1177/10499091211034365. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
2
Historical Perspectives: Shared Decision Making in the NICU.
Neoreviews. 2020 Apr;21(4):e217-e225. doi: 10.1542/neo.21-4-e217.
3
Market Share of US Catholic Hospitals and Associated Geographic Network Access to Reproductive Health Services.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1920053. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20053.
4
The importance of shared decision-making in the neonatal intensive care unit.
J Perinatol. 2020 Mar;40(3):504-509. doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0507-6. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
5
Supporting Family Decision-making for a Child Who Is Seriously Ill: Creating Synchrony and Connection.
Pediatrics. 2018 Nov;142(Suppl 3):S170-S177. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-0516H.
6
Responding to Those Who Hope for a Miracle: Practices for Clinical Bioethicists.
Am J Bioeth. 2018 May;18(5):40-51. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1431702.
7
The Effect of Spiritual Care on Stress Levels of Mothers in NICU.
West J Nurs Res. 2018 Jul;40(7):997-1011. doi: 10.1177/0193945916686775. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
8
Parental Decision-Making Preferences in Neonatal Intensive Care.
J Pediatr. 2016 Dec;179:36-41.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.08.030. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
9
Neonatal euthanasia: The Groningen Protocol.
Linacre Q. 2014 Nov;81(4):388-92. doi: 10.1179/0024363914Z.00000000086.
10
Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice.
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6. Epub 2012 May 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验