• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依赖私营部门卫生服务对健康权的影响。

The impact of reliance on private sector health services on the right to health.

作者信息

Chapman Audrey

机构信息

Professor, Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, University of Connecticut School of Medicine.

出版信息

Health Hum Rights. 2014 Jun 14;16(1):122-33.

PMID:25474601
Abstract

A human rights approach is predicated on the responsibility of states to design health systems and implement health policies that are consistent with human rights requirements. However, in the contemporary health landscape, health services are increasingly delivered through private health sector institutions, and governments often lack direct control over some or many components of the health system. Private provision of health services does not change the role of the state as the ultimate guarantor of the realization of health rights obligations, but it makes implementing its responsibilities more difficult. This article explores the extent and ways in which privatization of health services potentially is and is not compatible with human rights commitments. Additionally, the article identifies factors and policies that can mitigate or exacerbate the impact of private health services on the realization of the right to health.

摘要

人权方法基于国家有责任设计符合人权要求的卫生系统并实施卫生政策。然而,在当代卫生领域,卫生服务越来越多地通过私营卫生部门机构提供,政府往往对卫生系统的某些或许多组成部分缺乏直接控制权。私营部门提供卫生服务并没有改变国家作为实现健康权义务最终保障者的角色,但却使其履行责任更加困难。本文探讨了卫生服务私有化在哪些方面可能符合或不符合人权承诺,以及符合或不符合的方式。此外,本文还确定了可以减轻或加剧私营卫生服务对健康权实现影响的因素和政策。

相似文献

1
The impact of reliance on private sector health services on the right to health.依赖私营部门卫生服务对健康权的影响。
Health Hum Rights. 2014 Jun 14;16(1):122-33.
2
Private initiatives and policy options: recent health system experience in India.私营部门举措与政策选择:印度近期的卫生系统经验
Health Policy Plan. 2001 Mar;16(1):87-97. doi: 10.1093/heapol/16.1.87.
3
The international right to health: state obligations and private actors in the health care system.国际健康权:国家义务与医疗保健系统中的私人行为体
J Law Med. 2013 Sep;21(1):194-209.
4
Government and private rights and responsibilities.政府及私人的权利与责任。
Draper Fund Rep. 1983 Aug(12):9-10.
5
How the World Trade Organisation is shaping domestic policies in health care.世界贸易组织如何塑造医疗保健领域的国内政策。
Lancet. 1999 Nov 27;354(9193):1889-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)11060-2.
6
International obligations through collective rights: Moving from foreign health assistance to global health governance.通过集体权利承担国际义务:从对外卫生援助走向全球卫生治理。
Health Hum Rights. 2010 Jun 15;12(1):61-72.
7
Is there a human right to private health care?是否存在享有私人医疗保健的人权?
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Spring;41(1):138-46. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12010.
8
From cooperation to competition in national health systems--and back?: impact on professional ethics and quality of care.国家卫生系统中从合作到竞争——再回归?:对职业道德和医疗质量的影响
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2000 Jan-Mar;15(1):61-79. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(200001/03)15:1<61::AID-HPM573>3.0.CO;2-4.
9
Assessing Private Sector Involvement in Health Care and Universal Health Coverage in Light of the Right to Health.从健康权角度评估私营部门在医疗保健和全民健康覆盖中的参与情况。
Health Hum Rights. 2016 Dec;18(2):79-92.
10
Health care rights: distinct claims, distinct justifications.医疗保健权利:不同的主张,不同的理由。
Stanford Law Pol Rev. 1991 Fall;3:90-102.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of legal empowerment to improve access to quality health services: a scoping review.利用法律赋权增进获得优质卫生服务的机会:范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Sep 16;21(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01731-3.
2
Motivations Influencing the Surgeon's Healthcare Unit Choice to Perform Surgery: A Confirmatory Study in Portugal.影响外科医生选择医疗单位进行手术的动机:葡萄牙的一项验证性研究。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2019 Oct 24;10(1):143-158. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe10010013.
3
The effects of neoliberal policies on access to healthcare for people with disabilities.
新自由主义政策对残疾人获得医疗保健的影响。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Nov 15;16(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0699-3.
4
A systematic tale of two differing reviews: evaluating the evidence on public and private sector quality of primary care in low and middle income countries.关于两项不同综述的系统阐述:评估低收入和中等收入国家公共部门与私营部门初级医疗保健质量的证据
Global Health. 2017 Apr 12;13(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0246-4.