Suppr超能文献

欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织信息问卷(EORTC QLQ - INFO25)在伊朗癌症患者中的验证研究。

Validation study of the EORTC information questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-INFO25) in Iranian cancer patients.

作者信息

Asadi-Lari Mohsen, Ahmadi Pishkuhi Mahin, Almasi-Hashiani Amir, Safiri Saeid, Sepidarkish Mahdi

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of public health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jul;23(7):1875-82. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2510-y. Epub 2014 Dec 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Developing a tool for measuring patient's needs is a vital step in the process of cancer treatment and research. In recent years, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) made a questionnaire to measure cancer patients' received information. Since validity and reliability of any instrument should be evaluated in the new environment and culture, the aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the EORTC QLQ-INFO25 in Iranian cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred seventy-three patients with different stages of cancer filled questionnaire EORTC QLQ-INFO25, EORTC QLQ-C30, and EORTC IN-PATSAT32. Twenty-five patients answered the questionnaire twice at an interval of 2 weeks. Reliability and validity of the questionnaire was measured by Cronbach's alpha, interclass correlation, test retest, inter-rater agreement (IRA), and exploratory factorial analyses.

RESULTS

Using a conservative approach, the IRA for the overall relevancy and clarity of the tool was 87/86% and 83.33%, respectively. Overall appropriateness and clarity were 94.13 and 91.87%, respectively. Overall integrity of the instrument was determined to be 85%. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for all domains and total inventory were top 70 and 90%, respectively. Interclass correlation index ranges between 0.708 and 0.965. Exploratory factorial analyses demonstrate six fields suitable for instrument. Correlation between areas of the questionnaires EORTC QLQ-INFO25 and EORTC in-Patsat32 represents the convergent validity of the questionnaire. Also, results show a standard divergent validity in all domains of the questionnaire (Rho <0.3). Low correlation between the areas of the questionnaires EORTC QLQ-INFO25 and EORTC QLQ-C30 (<0.3) demonstrates the divergence validity of the questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that Persian version of the questionnaire EORTC QLQ-INFO25 is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring the perception of information in cancer patients.

摘要

引言

开发一种测量患者需求的工具是癌症治疗和研究过程中的关键一步。近年来,欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)编制了一份问卷来衡量癌症患者所获得的信息。由于任何工具的有效性和可靠性都应在新的环境和文化中进行评估,本研究的目的是评估EORTC QLQ - INFO25在伊朗癌症患者中的有效性和可靠性。

材料与方法

173例不同癌症阶段的患者填写了EORTC QLQ - INFO25问卷、EORTC QLQ - C30问卷和EORTC IN - PATSAT32问卷。25例患者每隔2周回答一次问卷。通过克朗巴哈系数、组内相关系数、重测法、评分者间一致性(IRA)和探索性因子分析来测量问卷的可靠性和有效性。

结果

采用保守方法,该工具整体相关性和清晰度的IRA分别为87/86%和83.33%。整体适宜性和清晰度分别为94.13%和91.87%。该工具的整体完整性确定为85%。所有领域和总量表的克朗巴哈系数分别高达70%和90%。组内相关指数范围在0.708至0.965之间。探索性因子分析表明该工具适合六个领域。EORTC QLQ - INFO25问卷和EORTC IN - PATSAT32问卷各领域之间的相关性代表了问卷的收敛效度。此外,结果显示问卷所有领域均具有标准的区分效度(Rho <0.3)。EORTC QLQ - INFO25问卷和EORTC QLQ - C30问卷各领域之间的低相关性(<0.3)表明了问卷的区分效度。

结论

结果表明,EORTC QLQ - INFO25问卷的波斯语版本是一种可靠且有效的工具,可用于测量癌症患者对信息的感知。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验