Kok Miranda G M, Somsen Govert W, de Jong Gerhardus J
Biomolecular Analysis, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80082, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands; Research group Analysis Techniques in Life Sciences, Avans Hogeschool, P.O. Box 90116, 4800 RA Breda, The Netherlands.
Biomolecular Analysis, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80082, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands; AIMSS Division of BioAnalytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, VU University, De Boelelaan 1083, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Talanta. 2015 Jan;132:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.08.047. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
In order to assess the utility of a recently developed capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) method for the study of anionic metabolites in urine, a comparison was made with hydrophilic interaction chromatography-MS (HILIC-MS) using negative electrospray ionization. After optimization of the HILIC conditions, a gradient employing 10mM ammonium acetate (pH 6.8) in acetonitrile-water (5 min 90% acetonitrile followed by 90%-50% acetonitrile in 10 min) was selected, providing baseline separation of five representative anionic test metabolites. Relative standard deviations (RSDs) for HILIC retention times and peak areas were below 0.2% and 7.7%, respectively, and detection limits were in the range 0.04-2.21 μM. Metabolites in rat urine could also be analysed in a reproducible way with retention time and peak area RSDs below 0.6% and 13.6%, respectively. The CE-MS and HILIC-MS methods were compared in terms of reproducibility, sensitivity, selectivity and coverage of the anionic urinary metabolome. In general, peak area RSDs were similar whereas HILIC-MS yielded better retention-time repeatability and up to 80 times lower detection limits (expressed in injected concentration) for test metabolites as compared to CE-MS. Rat urine analysis by HILIC-MS provided detection of 1360 molecular features compared to 347 molecular features revealed with CE-MS. Of these, a number of 144 molecular features were found with both HILIC-MS and CE-MS, which showed on average 10 times higher peak areas in HILIC-MS. The HILIC retention and CE migration times of the common features were clearly not correlated. The HILIC and CE behavior of the test metabolites and 16 putatively identified common features were evaluated involving their physicochemical properties, indicating a markedly different separation selectivity, and thus significant degree of orthogonality of HILIC and CE.
为了评估最近开发的毛细管电泳 - 质谱联用(CE-MS)方法在尿液中阴离子代谢物研究中的实用性,将其与采用负电喷雾电离的亲水作用色谱 - 质谱联用(HILIC-MS)方法进行了比较。在优化HILIC条件后,选择了一种梯度方法,即在乙腈 - 水体系中使用10mM醋酸铵(pH 6.8)(5分钟内90%乙腈,随后在10分钟内从90%乙腈降至50%乙腈),实现了五种代表性阴离子测试代谢物的基线分离。HILIC保留时间和峰面积的相对标准偏差(RSD)分别低于0.2%和7.7%,检测限在0.04 - 2.21μM范围内。大鼠尿液中的代谢物也能够以可重复的方式进行分析,保留时间和峰面积的RSD分别低于0.6%和13.6%。对CE-MS和HILIC-MS方法在重现性、灵敏度、选择性以及阴离子尿液代谢组覆盖范围方面进行了比较。总体而言,峰面积RSD相似,而与CE-MS相比,HILIC-MS具有更好的保留时间重复性,测试代谢物的检测限(以进样浓度表示)低至80倍。通过HILIC-MS分析大鼠尿液可检测到1360个分子特征,而CE-MS仅揭示了347个分子特征。其中,HILIC-MS和CE-MS共同发现了144个分子特征,这些特征在HILIC-MS中的峰面积平均高出10倍。共同特征的HILIC保留时间和CE迁移时间明显不相关。对测试代谢物和16个推测鉴定出的共同特征的HILIC和CE行为进行了评估,涉及其物理化学性质,表明分离选择性明显不同,因此HILIC和CE具有显著的正交性。