• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定实施 COPD 护理包的挑战和促进因素。

Identifying the challenges and facilitators of implementing a COPD care bundle.

机构信息

Department of Medicine , Imperial College London, NIHR CLAHRC for Northwest London , London , UK.

Imperial College NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital , London , UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Respir Res. 2014 Jun 20;1(1):e000035. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000035. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000035
PMID:25478183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4213007/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Care bundles have been shown to improve outcomes, reduce hospital readmissions and reduce length of hospital stay; therefore increasing the speed of uptake and delivery of care bundles should be a priority in order to deliver more timely improvements and consistent high-quality care. Previous studies have detailed the difficulties of obtaining full compliance to bundle elements but few have described the underlying reasons for this. In order to improve future implementation this paper investigates the challenges encountered by clinical teams implementing a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care bundle and describes actions taken to overcome these challenges.

METHODS

An initial retrospective documentary analysis of data from seven clinical implementation teams was undertaken to review the challenges faced by the clinical teams. Three focus groups with healthcare professionals and managers explored solutions to these challenges developed during the project.

RESULTS

Documentary analysis identified 28 challenges which directly impacted implementation of the COPD care bundle within five themes; staffing, infrastructure, process, use of improvement methodology and patient and public involvement. Focus groups revealed that the five most significant challenges for all groups were: staff too busy, staff shortages, lack of staff engagement, added workload of the bundle and patient coding issues. The participants shared facilitating factors used to overcome issues including: shifting perceptions to improve engagement, further education sessions to increase staff participation and gaining buy-in from managers through payment frameworks.

CONCLUSIONS

Maximising the impact of a care bundle relies on its successful and timely implementation. Teams implementing the COPD care bundle encountered challenges that were common to all teams and sites. Understanding and learning from the challenges faced by previous endeavours and identifying the facilitators to overcoming these barriers provides an opportunity to mitigate issues that waste time and resources, and ensures that training can be tailored to the anticipated challenges.

摘要

背景

护理套餐已被证明可以改善结果,降低医院再入院率并缩短住院时间;因此,加快护理套餐的采用和实施速度应该是优先事项,以便更及时地改进和提供始终如一的高质量护理。先前的研究详细说明了获得套餐要素完全遵守的困难,但很少描述其根本原因。为了改进未来的实施,本文调查了实施慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)护理套餐的临床团队所遇到的挑战,并描述了为克服这些挑战而采取的行动。

方法

对七个临床实施团队的数据进行了初步回顾性文档分析,以审查临床团队面临的挑战。与医疗保健专业人员和管理人员进行了三次焦点小组讨论,探讨了项目中开发的解决这些挑战的方法。

结果

文档分析确定了 28 个挑战,这些挑战直接影响了 COPD 护理套餐在五个主题中的实施:人员配备、基础设施、流程、改进方法的使用以及患者和公众的参与。焦点小组揭示了所有组都面临的五个最重大挑战:员工太忙、人员短缺、员工参与度低、套餐的工作量增加以及患者编码问题。参与者分享了克服问题的促进因素,包括:改变观念以提高参与度、增加更多的教育课程以提高员工参与度,并通过薪酬框架获得经理的认可。

结论

最大限度地发挥护理套餐的影响取决于其成功和及时的实施。实施 COPD 护理套餐的团队遇到了所有团队和站点都普遍存在的挑战。了解和借鉴先前努力中面临的挑战,并确定克服这些障碍的促进因素,为避免浪费时间和资源的问题提供了机会,并确保培训可以针对预期的挑战进行调整。

相似文献

1
Identifying the challenges and facilitators of implementing a COPD care bundle.确定实施 COPD 护理包的挑战和促进因素。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2014 Jun 20;1(1):e000035. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2014-000035. eCollection 2014.
2
Factors influencing the implementation and uptake of a discharge care bundle for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative focus group study.影响慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重患者出院护理包实施与采用的因素:一项定性焦点小组研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Aug 21;1:3. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00017-5. eCollection 2020.
3
Implementing an Evidence-Based COPD Hospital Discharge Protocol: A Narrative Review and Expert Recommendations.实施基于证据的 COPD 医院出院方案:叙述性综述和专家建议。
Adv Ther. 2023 Oct;40(10):4236-4263. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02609-8. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
4
5
Using and implementing care bundles for patients with acute admission for COPD: qualitative study of healthcare professionals' experience in four hospitals in England.使用和实施急性 COPD 入院患者护理包:英格兰四所医院医疗保健专业人员经验的定性研究。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020 Mar;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000515.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Evaluation of 'care bundles' for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a multisite study in the UK.评估“护理包”在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中的应用:英国多地点研究。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019 May 30;6(1):e000425. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000425. eCollection 2019.
8
Use of a care bundle in the emergency department for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a feasibility study.在急诊科使用护理包治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重:一项可行性研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:605-11. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S52883. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
9
Reliable adherence to a COPD care bundle mitigates system-level failures and reduces COPD readmissions: a system redesign using improvement science.可靠地遵循 COPD 护理包可减轻系统层面的失败并降低 COPD 再入院率:使用改进科学进行系统重新设计。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Nov;26(11):908-918. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006529. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
10
Identifying models of care to improve outcomes for older people with urgent care needs: a mixed methods approach to develop a system dynamics model.确定照护模式以改善有紧急照护需求的老年人的结局:一种开发系统动力学模型的混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(14):1-183. doi: 10.3310/NLCT5104.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of an Inpatient COPD Care Pathway on Hospital Care Process and Outcome Metrics.住院慢性阻塞性肺疾病护理路径对医院护理流程及结果指标的影响
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2025 Jul 30;12(4):304-316. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0585.
2
Mapping the Common Barriers to Optimal COPD Care in High and Middle-Income Countries: Qualitative Perspectives from Clinicians.绘制高、中收入国家 COPD 最佳护理常见障碍图:来自临床医生的定性观点。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 May 30;19:1207-1223. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S449659. eCollection 2024.
3
Applying RE-AIM to examine the impact of an implementation facilitation package to scale up a program for Veterans with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Model-driven approach to data collection and reporting for quality improvement.用于质量改进的数据收集和报告的模型驱动方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Dec;52:151-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 May 27.
2
Usefulness of the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test to evaluate severity of COPD exacerbations.慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试在评估 COPD 加重严重程度中的作用。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Jun 1;185(11):1218-24. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201110-1843OC. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
3
Designing and implementing a COPD discharge care bundle.
应用RE-AIM模型来检验实施促进方案对扩大慢性阻塞性肺疾病退伍军人项目规模的影响。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Nov 21;4(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00520-5.
4
Implementing an Evidence-Based COPD Hospital Discharge Protocol: A Narrative Review and Expert Recommendations.实施基于证据的 COPD 医院出院方案:叙述性综述和专家建议。
Adv Ther. 2023 Oct;40(10):4236-4263. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02609-8. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
5
Evaluation of an implementation package to deliver the COPD CARE service.实施一揽子计划以提供 COPD CARE 服务的评估。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Feb;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002074.
6
Association of Registered Nurse Staffing With Mortality Risk of Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized With Sepsis.注册护士人员配备与因败血症住院的 Medicare 受益人的死亡率风险之间的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 May 27;3(5):e221173. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.1173. eCollection 2022 May.
7
Formative research to design an implementation strategy for a postpartum hemorrhage initial response treatment bundle (E-MOTIVE): study protocol.为产后出血初始应对治疗包(E-MOTIVE)设计实施策略的形成性研究:研究方案
Reprod Health. 2021 Jul 14;18(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01162-3.
8
What risks to sustainability are identified throughout care bundle implementation and how can they be addressed? A mixed methods case study.在护理捆绑包实施过程中发现了哪些可持续性风险,以及如何解决这些风险?一项混合方法的案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 11;11(6):e048815. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048815.
9
Improving continuity of care of patients with respiratory disease at hospital discharge.改善呼吸系统疾病患者出院时的护理连续性。
Breathe (Sheff). 2020 Sep;16(3):200161. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0161-2020.
10
Avoiding unnecessary hospitalisation for patients with chronic conditions: a systematic review of implementation determinants for hospital avoidance programmes.避免慢性疾病患者的不必要住院:医院回避计划实施决定因素的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2020 Oct 21;15(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01049-0.
设计并实施 COPD 出院护理套餐。
Thorax. 2012 Jan;67(1):90-2. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200233. Epub 2011 Aug 16.
4
Systematic review of discharge coding accuracy.系统回顾出院编码准确性。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Mar;34(1):138-48. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr054. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
5
Adherence to ventilator-associated pneumonia bundle and incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in the surgical intensive care unit.外科重症监护病房中呼吸机相关性肺炎集束化治疗的依从性及呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率
Arch Surg. 2010 May;145(5):465-70. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.69.
6
Review: electronic health records and the reliability and validity of quality measures: a review of the literature.综述:电子健康记录与质量指标的可靠性和有效性:文献回顾。
Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Oct;67(5):503-27. doi: 10.1177/1077558709359007. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
7
Bundled care for septic shock: an analysis of clinical trials.脓毒性休克的捆绑式护理:临床试验分析。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):668-78. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cb0ddf.
8
Reduction of 30-day postdischarge hospital readmission or emergency department (ED) visit rates in high-risk elderly medical patients through delivery of a targeted care bundle.通过提供针对性的护理包,降低高危老年内科患者出院后30天内的医院再入院率或急诊科就诊率。
J Hosp Med. 2009 Apr;4(4):211-8. doi: 10.1002/jhm.427.
9
Measurable outcomes of quality improvement in the trauma intensive care unit: the impact of a daily quality rounding checklist.创伤重症监护病房质量改进的可衡量结果:每日质量巡查清单的影响
J Trauma. 2008 Jan;64(1):22-7; discussion 27-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318161b0c8.
10
The Cooksey review of UK health research funding.库克西对英国健康研究资金的审查。
BMJ. 2006 Dec 16;333(7581):1231-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39059.444120.80.