Suppr超能文献

通过血管造影术中心肌梗死帧数对不稳定型心绞痛/非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者进行冠状动脉血流评估

Coronary Flow Assessment in Unstable Angina/non ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients via Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Frame Count in Angiography.

作者信息

Sanati Hamidreza, Zahedmehr Ali, Firouzi Ata, Salehi Negar, Maadani Mohsen, Shakerian Farshad, Kiani Reza, Golnari Pedram, Parchami-Ghazaee Sepideh, Peighambari Mohammadmehdi

机构信息

Cardiovascular Intervention Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.

出版信息

Res Cardiovasc Med. 2013 May;2(2):95-8. doi: 10.5812/cardiovascmed.9087. Epub 2013 May 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

TIMI Frame Count (TFC) is one of the methods to estimate the coronary blood flow velocity. This is a simple, inexpensive, quantitative, reproducible, and continuous variable method. Many studies have been conducted on TFC assessment in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients.

OBJECTIVES

The present study is aimed to measure the TFC in the coronary arteries of UA/NSTEMI patients to find abnormalities in diseased or patent vessels and compare with the normal values.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The participants were 105 consecutive UA/NSTEMI patients who underwent coronary angiography in Shahid Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Tehran, Iran in 2009. Exclusion criteria were history of CABG, PCI, or STEMI or presence of occluded arteries in angiography. We measured the coronary TFC in these patients. We examined also 55 stable patients without coronary lesions and with TIMI 3 flow to have an estimation of normal TFCs.

RESULTS

From a total of 105 patients, 25 (23.8%) had no significant coronary lesion (> 60%); 35 (33.3%) were diagnosed with single vessel disease; 22 (21%) were 2VD; and 23 (21.9%) were 3 VD.). In overall, mean TFC in UA/NSTEMI group was 28.7 (± 14) frames compared to 23.8 (± 7.8) frames in the normal group (P < 0.05). In the vessels with significant lesions, TFC was significantly higher than normal (30.84 vs. 23.8; P < 0.001) and also significantly higher than patent vessels of the same patients (30.84 vs. 26.10; P = 0.029). In these patients, patent vessels had higher TFC values compared to normal coronaries (26.10 vs. 23.8), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.12). In the patients with significant lesions, mean TFC was higher than the same value in acute coronary patients without significant lesions (29.3 vs. 27.2), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.114). In the patients who underwent PCI and stenting, TFC changed significantly after PCI toward the normal value (P = 0.001). In the patients with elevated cardiac enzymes, TFC was higher but the difference was not significant (P = 0.35).

CONCLUSIONS

Patent coronaries of UA/NSTEMI patients have a trend to higher TFCs compared to normal values. Presence of significant coronary lesions in these patients significantly increases TFC.

摘要

背景

心肌梗死溶栓试验(TIMI)帧数计数(TFC)是评估冠状动脉血流速度的方法之一。这是一种简单、廉价、定量、可重复的连续变量方法。关于ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的TFC评估已开展了许多研究。

目的

本研究旨在测量不稳定型心绞痛/非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(UA/NSTEMI)患者冠状动脉的TFC,以发现病变血管或通畅血管的异常情况,并与正常值进行比较。

患者与方法

研究对象为2009年在伊朗德黑兰沙希德拉贾伊心血管医学与研究中心接受冠状动脉造影的105例连续UA/NSTEMI患者。排除标准为冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或STEMI病史,或血管造影显示存在闭塞动脉。我们测量了这些患者的冠状动脉TFC。我们还检查了55例无冠状动脉病变且TIMI血流3级的稳定患者,以评估正常TFC值。

结果

在总共105例患者中,25例(23.8%)无显著冠状动脉病变(>60%);35例(33.3%)被诊断为单支血管病变;22例(21%)为双支血管病变;23例(21.9%)为三支血管病变。总体而言,UA/NSTEMI组的平均TFC为28.7(±14)帧,而正常组为23.8(±7.8)帧(P<0.05)。在有显著病变的血管中,TFC显著高于正常水平(30.84对23.8;P<0.001),也显著高于同一患者的通畅血管(30.84对26.10;P=0.029)。在这些患者中,通畅血管的TFC值高于正常冠状动脉(26.10对23.8),但差异不显著(P=0.12)。在有显著病变的患者中,平均TFC高于无显著病变的急性冠状动脉患者(29.3对27.2),但差异不显著(P=0.114)。在接受PCI和支架置入的患者中,PCI后TFC显著向正常值变化(P=0.001)。在心肌酶升高的患者中,TFC较高,但差异不显著(P=0.35)。

结论

与正常值相比,UA/NSTEMI患者的通畅冠状动脉有TFC升高的趋势。这些患者中存在显著冠状动脉病变会显著增加TFC。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Importance of the TIMI frame count: implications for future trials.
Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2000;1(1):31-34. doi: 10.1186/cvm-1-1-031.
6
Estimation of coronary flow reserve using the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) frame count method.
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Jun 1;83(11):1562-5, A7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00149-6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验