de Vries M, Bokkers E A M, van Reenen C G, Engel B, van Schaik G, Dijkstra T, de Boer I J M
Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Livestock Research, Wageningen UR, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Prev Vet Med. 2015 Jan 1;118(1):80-92. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.11.016. Epub 2014 Nov 23.
Knowledge of potential synergies and trade-offs between housing and management factors for different aspects of animal welfare is essential for farmers who aim to improve the level of welfare in their herds. The aim of this research was to identify and compare housing and management factors associated with prevalence of lameness, prevalence of lesions or swellings, prevalence of dirty hindquarters, and frequency of displacements (social behavior) in dairy herds in free-stall housing. Seven observers collected data regarding housing and management characteristics of 179 Dutch dairy herds (herd size: 22-211 cows) in free-stall housing during winter. Lame cows, cows with lesions or swellings, and cows with dirty hindquarters were counted and occurrence of displacements was recorded during 120 min of observation. For each of the four welfare indicators, housing and management factors associated with the welfare indicator were selected in a succession of logistic or log-linear regression analyses. Prevalence of lameness was associated with surface of the lying area, summer pasturing, herd biosecurity status, and far-off and close-up dry cow groups (P<0.05). Prevalence of lesions or swellings was associated with surface of the lying area, summer pasturing, light intensity in the barn, and days in milk when the maximum amount of concentrates was fed (P<0.05). Prevalence of dirty hindquarters was associated with surface of the lying area, proportion of stalls with fecal contamination, head lunge impediments in stalls, and number of roughage types (P<0.05). Average frequency of displacements was associated with the time of introducing heifers in the lactating group, the use of cow brushes, continuous availability of roughage, floor scraping frequency, herd size, and the proportion cows to stalls (P<0.05). Prevalences of lameness and of lesions or swellings were lower in herds with soft mats or mattresses (odd ratio (OR)=0.66 and 0.58, confidence interval (CI)=0.48-0.91 and 0.39-0.85) or deep bedding (OR=0.48 and 0.48, CI=0.32-0.71 and 0.30-0.77) in stalls, compared with concrete, and in herds with summer pasturing (OR=0.68 and 0.41, CI=0.51-0.90 and 0.27-0.61), compared with zero-grazing. Deep bedding in stalls was negatively associated with prevalence of dirty hindquarters (OR=0.50, CI=0.29-0.86), compared with hard mats. It was concluded that some aspects of housing and management are common protective factors for prevalence of lameness, lesions or swellings, and dirty hindquarters, but not for frequency of displacements.
对于旨在提高畜群福利水平的养殖户来说,了解不同动物福利方面的住房与管理因素之间潜在的协同作用和权衡关系至关重要。本研究的目的是识别和比较与自由牛舍饲养的奶牛群中跛足患病率、病变或肿胀患病率、后躯肮脏患病率以及移位频率(社会行为)相关的住房和管理因素。七名观察者收集了179个荷兰自由牛舍饲养的奶牛群(牛群规模:22 - 211头奶牛)冬季的住房和管理特征数据。在120分钟的观察期间,统计跛足奶牛、有病变或肿胀的奶牛以及后躯肮脏的奶牛数量,并记录移位情况。对于四个福利指标中的每一个,在一系列逻辑或对数线性回归分析中选择与该福利指标相关的住房和管理因素。跛足患病率与躺卧区面积、夏季放牧、牛群生物安全状况以及远干奶牛群和近干奶牛群有关(P<0.05)。病变或肿胀患病率与躺卧区面积、夏季放牧、牛舍光照强度以及喂食最大量精饲料时的泌乳天数有关(P<0.05)。后躯肮脏患病率与躺卧区面积、粪便污染的畜栏比例、畜栏中的头部前冲障碍以及粗饲料类型数量有关(P<0.05)。移位平均频率与小母牛引入泌乳组的时间、牛刷的使用、粗饲料的持续供应、地面刮擦频率、牛群规模以及奶牛与畜栏的比例有关(P<0.05)。与混凝土畜栏相比,使用软垫或床垫(优势比(OR)=0.66和0.58,置信区间(CI)=0.48 - 0.91和0.39 - 0.85)或厚垫料(OR=0.48和0.48,CI=0.32 - 0.71和0.30 - 0.77)的牛群中,跛足患病率和病变或肿胀患病率较低;与零放牧相比,夏季放牧的牛群中患病率较低(OR=0.68和0.41,CI=0.51 - 0.90和0.27 - 0.61)。与硬垫相比,畜栏中的厚垫料与后躯肮脏患病率呈负相关(OR=0.50,CI=0.29 - 0.86)。得出的结论是,住房和管理的某些方面是跛足、病变或肿胀以及后躯肮脏患病率的共同保护因素,但不是移位频率的保护因素。