Moritani Suzuko, Ichihara Shu, Yatabe Yasushi, Hasegawa Masaki, Iwakoshi Akari, Hosoda Waki, Narita Michihiko, Nagai Yuichiro, Asai Masami, Ujihira Nobuko, Yuba Yoshiaki, Jijiwa Mayumi
Department of Advanced Diagnosis, Division of Pathology, Nagoya Medical Center, 4-1-1, Sannomaru, Naka-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 460-0001, Japan,
Virchows Arch. 2015 Feb;466(2):191-8. doi: 10.1007/s00428-014-1687-2. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
To determine which immunohistochemical markers are useful for the identification of neoplastic myoepithelial cells in adenomyoepithelioma of the breast, the expression of seven myoepithelial markers (α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), calponin, p63, CD10, cytokeratin 5/6, cytokeratin 14, and S-100) was examined in 19 lesions from 16 patients. The lesion consisted of seven spindle and 12 clear cell lesions. For normal myoepithelial cells, α-SMA, calponin, and p63 were significantly more sensitive than cytokeratin 5/6, cytokeratin 14, and S-100. There was no significant difference in the expression of α-SMA, calponin, p63, and CD10 in neoplastic myoepithelial cells of adenomyoepithelioma regardless of spindle or clear cell types. In spindle cell lesions, high-molecular weight cytokeratins (HMWCK; cytokeratin 5/6 and cytokeratin 14) tended to show higher staining scores and S-100 showed lower staining scores than other markers. In clear cell lesions, HMWCK showed significantly lower staining scores than the other five markers. There was no significant difference in staining scores among the other five markers. HMWCK showed a unique paradoxical staining pattern in clear cell lesions, with diffusely positive inner epithelial cells and completely negative outer myoepithelial cells. Although the sensitivity of HMWCK in clear cell lesions is low, with this unique paradoxical staining pattern and relatively high sensitivity in spindle cell lesions, HMWCK could be useful in diagnosing adenomyoepithelioma. In choosing immunohistochemical markers, any of the seven markers are useful, but combining HMWCK and any one of α-SMA, calponin, and p63 would be a good panel for the diagnosis of adenomyoepithelioma.
为了确定哪些免疫组化标志物有助于乳腺腺肌上皮瘤中肿瘤性肌上皮细胞的识别,我们检测了16例患者19个病变中7种肌上皮标志物(α-平滑肌肌动蛋白(α-SMA)、钙调蛋白、p63、CD10、细胞角蛋白5/6、细胞角蛋白14和S-100)的表达。病变包括7个梭形细胞病变和12个透明细胞病变。对于正常肌上皮细胞,α-SMA、钙调蛋白和p63比细胞角蛋白5/6、细胞角蛋白14和S-100明显更敏感。无论梭形细胞还是透明细胞类型,腺肌上皮瘤肿瘤性肌上皮细胞中α-SMA、钙调蛋白、p63和CD10的表达均无显著差异。在梭形细胞病变中,高分子量细胞角蛋白(HMWCK;细胞角蛋白5/6和细胞角蛋白14)的染色评分往往高于其他标志物,而S-100的染色评分低于其他标志物。在透明细胞病变中,HMWCK的染色评分明显低于其他5种标志物。其他5种标志物之间的染色评分无显著差异。HMWCK在透明细胞病变中呈现独特的矛盾染色模式,内部上皮细胞弥漫性阳性,外部肌上皮细胞完全阴性。尽管HMWCK在透明细胞病变中的敏感性较低,但由于其独特的矛盾染色模式以及在梭形细胞病变中相对较高的敏感性,HMWCK可能有助于腺肌上皮瘤的诊断。在选择免疫组化标志物时,这7种标志物中的任何一种都有用,但将HMWCK与α-SMA、钙调蛋白和p63中的任何一种联合使用,将是诊断腺肌上皮瘤的良好组合。