Goehring Jenny L, Neff Donna L, Baudhuin Jacquelyn L, Hughes Michelle L
Boys Town National Research Hospital, Lied Learning and Technology Center, 425 North 30th Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68131.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Dec;136(6):3159. doi: 10.1121/1.4900634.
The first objective of this study was to determine whether adaptive pitch-ranking and electrode-discrimination tasks with cochlear-implant (CI) recipients produce similar results for perceiving intermediate "virtual-channel" pitch percepts using current steering. Previous studies have not examined both behavioral tasks in the same subjects with current steering. A second objective was to determine whether a physiological metric of spatial separation using the electrically evoked compound action potential spread-of-excitation (ECAP SOE) function could predict performance in the behavioral tasks. The metric was the separation index (Σ), defined as the difference in normalized amplitudes between two adjacent ECAP SOE functions, summed across all masker electrodes. Eleven CII or 90 K Advanced Bionics (Valencia, CA) recipients were tested using pairs of electrodes from the basal, middle, and apical portions of the electrode array. The behavioral results, expressed as d', showed no significant differences across tasks. There was also no significant effect of electrode region for either task. ECAP Σ was not significantly correlated with pitch ranking or electrode discrimination for any of the electrode regions. Therefore, the ECAP separation index is not sensitive enough to predict perceptual resolution of virtual channels.
本研究的首要目标是确定,对于使用电流转向来感知中间“虚拟通道”音调感知的人工耳蜗(CI)接受者,自适应音调排序任务和电极辨别任务是否会产生相似的结果。先前的研究尚未在同一受试者中使用电流转向对这两种行为任务进行检验。第二个目标是确定使用电诱发复合动作电位兴奋扩散(ECAP SOE)函数的空间分离生理指标是否能够预测行为任务中的表现。该指标为分离指数(Σ),定义为两个相邻ECAP SOE函数之间归一化幅度的差值,对所有掩蔽电极求和。使用来自电极阵列基部、中部和顶部的电极对,对11名CII或90K Advanced Bionics(加利福尼亚州瓦伦西亚)的接受者进行了测试。以d'表示的行为结果在各任务之间没有显著差异。对于任一任务,电极区域也没有显著影响。对于任何电极区域,ECAP Σ与音调排序或电极辨别均无显著相关性。因此,ECAP分离指数的敏感度不足以预测虚拟通道的感知分辨率。