Boys Town National Research Hospital, Lied Learning and Technology Center, 425 North 30th Street, Omaha, NE 68131, USA.
Hear Res. 2013 Dec;306:93-103. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.09.014. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
The primary goal of this study was to evaluate physiological spatial excitation patterns for stimulation of adjacent physical electrodes and intermediate virtual channels. Two experiments were conducted that utilized electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) spread-of-excitation (SOE) functions obtained with the traditional forward-masking subtraction method. These two experiments examined spatial excitation patterns for virtual-channel maskers and probes, respectively. In Experiment 1, ECAP SOE patterns were obtained for maskers applied to physical electrodes and virtual channels to determine whether virtual-channel maskers yield SOE patterns similar to those predicted from physical electrodes. In Experiment 2, spatial separation of SOE functions was compared for two adjacent physical probe electrodes and the intermediate virtual channel to determine the extent to which ECAP SOE patterns for virtual-channel probes are spatially separate from those obtained with physical electrodes. Data were obtained for three electrode regions (basal, middle, apical) for 35 ears implanted with Cochlear (N = 16) or Advanced Bionics (N = 19) devices. Results from Experiment 1 showed no significant difference between predicted and measured ECAP amplitudes for Advanced Bionics subjects. Measured ECAP amplitudes for virtual-channel maskers were significantly larger than the predicted amplitudes for Cochlear subjects; however, the difference was <2 μV and thus is likely not clinically significant. Results from Experiment 2 showed that the probe set in the apical region demonstrated the least amount of spatial separation amongst SOE functions, which may be attributed to more uniform nerve survival patterns, closer electrode spacing, and/or the tapered geometry of the cochlea. As expected, adjacent physical probes demonstrated greater spatial separation than for comparisons between each physical probe and the intermediate virtual channel. Finally, the virtual-channel SOE functions were generally weighted toward the basal electrode in the pair.
本研究的主要目的是评估相邻物理电极和中间虚拟通道刺激的生理空间激发模式。进行了两项实验,分别利用传统的正向掩蔽减法法获得电诱发复合动作电位(ECAP)扩展激发(SOE)函数。这两项实验分别研究了虚拟通道掩蔽器和探针的空间激发模式。在实验 1 中,获得了施加于物理电极和虚拟通道的掩蔽器的 ECAP SOE 模式,以确定虚拟通道掩蔽器是否产生类似于物理电极预测的 SOE 模式。在实验 2 中,比较了两个相邻物理探针电极和中间虚拟通道的 SOE 函数的空间分离程度,以确定虚拟通道探针的 ECAP SOE 模式在多大程度上与物理电极获得的 SOE 模式分离。为植入 Cochlear(N=16)或 Advanced Bionics(N=19)设备的 35 只耳朵的三个电极区域(基底、中部、顶部)获得了数据。实验 1 的结果表明,Advanced Bionics 受试者的预测和测量的 ECAP 幅度之间没有显著差异。虚拟通道掩蔽器的测量 ECAP 幅度明显大于 Cochlear 受试者的预测幅度;然而,差异小于 2 μV,因此可能没有临床意义。实验 2 的结果表明,顶部区域的探针组在 SOE 函数之间表现出最小的空间分离,这可能归因于更均匀的神经存活模式、更近的电极间距和/或耳蜗的锥形几何形状。正如预期的那样,相邻的物理探针之间的空间分离程度大于每个物理探针与中间虚拟通道之间的比较。最后,虚拟通道 SOE 函数通常偏向对电极。