Monti Martin M, Rosenberg Matthew, Finoia Paola, Kamau Evelyn, Pickard John D, Owen Adrian M
From the Department of Psychology (M.M.M., M.R.), University of California Los Angeles; the Department of Neurosurgery (M.M.M.), Brain Injury Research Center (BIRC), Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles; the Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (P.F.), Medical Research Council, Cambridge; the Division of Neurosurgery (P.F., E.K., J.D.P.), University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK; and the Natural Science Building (A.M.O.), Brain & Mind Institute, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Neurology. 2015 Jan 13;84(2):167-73. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001123. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
We employed functional MRI (fMRI) to assess whether (1) patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) retain the ability to willfully engage in top-down processing and (2) what neurophysiologic factors distinguish patients who can demonstrate this ability from patients who cannot.
Sixteen volunteers, 8 patients in vegetative state (VS), 16 minimally conscious patients (MCS), and 4 exit from MCS (eMCS) patients were enrolled in a prospective cross-sectional fMRI study. Participants performed a target detection task in which they counted the number of times a (changing) target word was presented amidst a set of distractors.
Three of 8 patients diagnosed as being in a VS exhibited significant activations in response to the task, thereby demonstrating a state of consciousness. Differential activations across tasks were also observed in 6 MCS patients and 1 eMCS patient. A psycho-physiologic interaction analysis revealed that the main factor distinguishing patients who responded to the task from those who did not was a greater connectivity between the anterior section of thalamus and prefrontal cortex.
In our sample of patients, the dissociation between overt behavior observable in clinical assessments and residual cognitive faculties is prevalent among DOC patients (37%). A substantial number of patients, including some diagnosed with VS, can demonstrate willful engagement in top-down cognition. While neuroimaging data are not the same as observable behavior, this suggests that the mental status of some VS patients exceeds what can be appreciated clinically. Furthermore, thalamo-frontal circuits might be crucial to sustaining top-down functions.
我们采用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)来评估:(1)意识障碍(DOC)患者是否保留了自上而下进行加工的能力;(2)哪些神经生理因素能够区分具有这种能力和不具有这种能力的患者。
16名志愿者、8名植物人状态(VS)患者、16名最小意识状态患者(MCS)以及4名从最小意识状态恢复(eMCS)的患者参与了一项前瞻性横断面fMRI研究。参与者执行一项目标检测任务,即他们要在一组干扰项中数出一个(不断变化的)目标词出现的次数。
8名被诊断为处于VS状态的患者中有3名在任务反应中表现出显著激活,从而证明了意识状态。在6名MCS患者和1名eMCS患者中也观察到了跨任务的差异激活。心理生理交互分析表明,区分对任务有反应和无反应患者的主要因素是丘脑前部与前额叶皮质之间更强的连接性。
在我们的患者样本中,临床评估中可观察到的明显行为与残余认知能力之间的分离在DOC患者中很普遍(37%)。相当一部分患者,包括一些被诊断为VS的患者,能够表现出有意识地参与自上而下的认知。虽然神经影像学数据与可观察到的行为不同,但这表明一些VS患者的精神状态超出了临床所能评估的范围。此外,丘脑-额叶回路可能对维持自上而下的功能至关重要。