van der Lande Glenn J M, Casas-Torremocha Diana, Manasanch Arnau, Dalla Porta Leonardo, Gosseries Olivia, Alnagger Naji, Barra Alice, Mejías Jorge F, Panda Rajanikant, Riefolo Fabio, Thibaut Aurore, Bonhomme Vincent, Thirion Bertrand, Clasca Francisco, Gorostiza Pau, Sanchez-Vives Maria V, Deco Gustavo, Laureys Steven, Zamora-López Gorka, Annen Jitka
GIGA-Consciousness, Coma Science Group, University of Liège, Liège 4000, Belgium.
Centre du Cerveau, University Hospital of Liège, Liège 4000, Belgium.
Brain Commun. 2024 Oct 11;6(5):fcae362. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae362. eCollection 2024.
Experimental and clinical studies of consciousness identify brain states (i.e. quasi-stable functional cerebral organization) in a non-systematic manner and largely independent of the research into brain state modulation. In this narrative review, we synthesize advances in the identification of brain states associated with consciousness in animal models and physiological (sleep), pharmacological (anaesthesia) and pathological (disorders of consciousness) states of altered consciousness in humans. We show that in reduced consciousness the frequencies in which the brain operates are slowed down and that the pattern of functional communication is sparser, less efficient, and less complex. The results also highlight damaged resting-state networks, in particular the default mode network, decreased connectivity in long-range connections and especially in the thalamocortical loops. Next, we show that therapeutic approaches to treat disorders of consciousness, through pharmacology (e.g. amantadine, zolpidem), and (non-) invasive brain stimulation (e.g. transcranial direct current stimulation, deep brain stimulation) have shown partial effectiveness in promoting consciousness recovery. Although some features of conscious brain states may improve in response to neuromodulation, targeting often remains non-specific and does not always lead to (behavioural) improvements. The fields of brain state identification and neuromodulation of brain states in relation to consciousness are showing fascinating developments that, when integrated, might propel the development of new and better-targeted techniques for disorders of consciousness. We here propose a therapeutic framework for the identification and modulation of brain states to facilitate the interaction between the two fields. We propose that brain states should be identified in a predictive setting, followed by theoretical and empirical testing (i.e. in animal models, under anaesthesia and in patients with a disorder of consciousness) of neuromodulation techniques to promote consciousness in line with such predictions. This framework further helps to identify where challenges and opportunities lay for the maturation of brain state research in the context of states of consciousness. It will become apparent that one angle of opportunity is provided through the addition of computational modelling. Finally, it aids in recognizing possibilities and obstacles for the clinical translation of these diagnostic techniques and neuromodulation treatment options across both the multimodal and multi-species approaches outlined throughout the review.
意识的实验和临床研究以非系统的方式识别脑状态(即准稳定的功能性脑组织),并且在很大程度上独立于对脑状态调节的研究。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们综合了动物模型以及人类意识改变的生理(睡眠)、药理(麻醉)和病理(意识障碍)状态下与意识相关的脑状态识别方面的进展。我们表明,在意识减弱时,大脑运作的频率会减慢,功能连接模式会更稀疏、效率更低且更不复杂。研究结果还突出了静息态网络受损,尤其是默认模式网络,远程连接的连通性降低,特别是丘脑皮质环路中的连通性。接下来,我们表明,通过药理学(如金刚烷胺、唑吡坦)以及(非)侵入性脑刺激(如经颅直流电刺激、深部脑刺激)治疗意识障碍的方法在促进意识恢复方面已显示出部分效果。尽管有意识脑状态的一些特征可能会因神经调节而改善,但靶点通常仍不具有特异性,并且并不总是能带来(行为上的)改善。与意识相关的脑状态识别和脑状态神经调节领域正展现出引人入胜的发展,若将二者整合,可能会推动针对意识障碍的更新且更具针对性技术的发展。我们在此提出一个用于识别和调节脑状态的治疗框架,以促进这两个领域之间的相互作用。我们建议应在预测性环境中识别脑状态,随后对神经调节技术进行理论和实证测试(即在动物模型、麻醉状态下以及意识障碍患者中),以根据此类预测促进意识恢复。该框架进一步有助于确定在意识状态背景下脑状态研究成熟所面临的挑战和机遇所在。很明显,通过增加计算建模可提供一个机遇角度。最后,它有助于认识这些诊断技术和神经调节治疗方案在整个综述中概述的多模态和多物种方法的临床转化中的可能性和障碍。