O'Leary Garry J, Christy Brendan, Nuttall James, Huth Neil, Cammarano Davide, Stöckle Claudio, Basso Bruno, Shcherbak Iurii, Fitzgerald Glenn, Luo Qunying, Farre-Codina Immaculada, Palta Jairo, Asseng Senthold
Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Horsham, Vic., 3401, Australia.
Department of Environment and Primary Industries, Rutherglen, Vic., 3658, Australia.
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Jul;21(7):2670-2686. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12830. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
The response of wheat crops to elevated CO (eCO ) was measured and modelled with the Australian Grains Free-Air CO Enrichment experiment, located at Horsham, Australia. Treatments included CO by water, N and temperature. The location represents a semi-arid environment with a seasonal VPD of around 0.5 kPa. Over 3 years, the observed mean biomass at anthesis and grain yield ranged from 4200 to 10 200 kg ha and 1600 to 3900 kg ha , respectively, over various sowing times and irrigation regimes. The mean observed response to daytime eCO (from 365 to 550 μmol mol CO ) was relatively consistent for biomass at stem elongation and at anthesis and LAI at anthesis and grain yield with 21%, 23%, 21% and 26%, respectively. Seasonal water use was decreased from 320 to 301 mm (P = 0.10) by eCO , increasing water use efficiency for biomass and yield, 36% and 31%, respectively. The performance of six models (APSIM-Wheat, APSIM-Nwheat, CAT-Wheat, CROPSYST, OLEARY-CONNOR and SALUS) in simulating crop responses to eCO was similar and within or close to the experimental error for accumulated biomass, yield and water use response, despite some variations in early growth and LAI. The primary mechanism of biomass accumulation via radiation use efficiency (RUE) or transpiration efficiency (TE) was not critical to define the overall response to eCO . However, under irrigation, the effect of late sowing on response to eCO to biomass accumulation at DC65 was substantial in the observed data (~40%), but the simulated response was smaller, ranging from 17% to 28%. Simulated response from all six models under no water or nitrogen stress showed similar response to eCO under irrigation, but the differences compared to the dryland treatment were small. Further experimental work on the interactive effects of eCO , water and temperature is required to resolve these model discrepancies.
利用位于澳大利亚霍舍姆的澳大利亚谷物自由空气二氧化碳富集实验,对小麦作物对高浓度二氧化碳(eCO₂)的响应进行了测量和建模。处理因素包括二氧化碳、水分、氮和温度。该地点代表半干旱环境,季节性水汽压亏缺约为0.5千帕。在3年时间里,在不同播种时间和灌溉制度下,开花期观测到的平均生物量和籽粒产量分别为4200至10200千克/公顷和1600至3900千克/公顷。观测到的对白天eCO₂(从365至550微摩尔/摩尔二氧化碳)的平均响应,对于拔节期和开花期的生物量、开花期的叶面积指数以及籽粒产量而言相对一致,分别为21%、23%、21%和26%。eCO₂使季节性用水量从320毫米降至301毫米(P = 0.10),生物量和产量的水分利用效率分别提高了36%和31%。六个模型(APSIM - 小麦、APSIM - N小麦、CAT - 小麦、CROPSYST、OLEARY - CONNOR和SALUS)在模拟作物对eCO₂的响应方面表现相似,对于累积生物量、产量和水分利用响应而言,模型结果在实验误差范围内或接近实验误差,尽管早期生长和叶面积指数存在一些差异。通过辐射利用效率(RUE)或蒸腾效率(TE)进行生物量积累的主要机制,对于确定对eCO₂的总体响应并非关键因素。然而,在灌溉条件下,在观测数据中,晚播对eCO₂对DC65阶段生物量积累的响应影响很大(约40%),但模拟响应较小,范围为17%至28%。在无水分或氮胁迫条件下,所有六个模型的模拟响应显示,灌溉条件下对eCO₂的响应与旱地处理相似,但与旱地处理相比差异较小。需要进一步开展关于eCO₂、水分和温度交互作用的实验工作,以解决这些模型差异问题。