Tsai Huei-Ting, Philips George, Taylor Kathryn L, Kowalczyk Keith, Huai-Ching Kuo, Potosky Arnold L
Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Georgetown University, Washington D.C., USA.
Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Georgetown University, Washington D.C., USA.
Urol Pract. 2017 Mar;4(2):132-139. doi: 10.1016/j.urpr.2016.05.005.
Expectant management (EM) reduces overtreatment in low-risk but not intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer (PCa). We assessed the use and predictors of EM to understand its uptake in U.S. practice.
Using the U.S. SEER-Medicare database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of men 66 years and older diagnosed with low-risk (N=25,506) or intermediate-risk (N=25,597) localized PCa between 2004 - 2011 and followed through December 31, 2012. We defined EM as no definitive therapy (DT) and at least one prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test or re-biopsy 4 - 12 months post diagnosis; or receiving DT after PSA testing or re-biopsy 7 - 12 months after diagnosis. We performed separate analyses for low-risk and intermediate-risk groups using multiple logistic regressions.
For men diagnosed with PCa in 2004-2011, EM increased from 22% to 43% in the low-risk group and from 15% to 18% in the intermediate-risk group. In the low-risk group, EM increased with patients' age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.26 for 71-75 years; 2.21 for 76-80 years; 6.33 for older then 80, p<0.0001, compared to 66-70 years). EM uptake was higher among men with comorbidities (aOR=1.29), and residing in the Pacific region (aOR=0.56, compared to the East Coast).
In U.S. practice, the utilization of EM steadily increased in low-risk PCa and remained low in the intermediate-risk group over time. While patients with advanced age or comorbidities were more likely to receive EM, its use varied substantially by geographic region. Our findings bring attention to the presence of multiple barriers for EM implementation.
期待性管理(EM)可减少低风险但非中风险局限性前列腺癌(PCa)的过度治疗。我们评估了期待性管理的使用情况及预测因素,以了解其在美国临床实践中的应用情况。
利用美国监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)-医疗保险数据库,我们对2004年至2011年期间诊断为低风险(N = 25,506)或中风险(N = 25,597)局限性PCa且年龄在66岁及以上的男性进行了一项回顾性队列研究,并随访至2012年12月31日。我们将期待性管理定义为未进行确定性治疗(DT),且在诊断后4至12个月至少进行一次前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测或再次活检;或在诊断后7至12个月进行PSA检测或再次活检后接受确定性治疗。我们使用多元逻辑回归对低风险和中风险组进行了单独分析。
对于2004 - 2011年诊断为PCa的男性,低风险组的期待性管理从22%增至43%,中风险组从15%增至18%。在低风险组中,期待性管理随患者年龄增加而增加(与66 - 70岁相比,71 - 75岁的调整优势比[aOR] = 1.26;76 - 80岁为2.21;80岁以上为6.33,p<0.0001)。有合并症的男性接受期待性管理的比例更高(aOR = 1.29),居住在太平洋地区的男性接受期待性管理的比例较低(与东海岸相比,aOR = 0.56)。
在美国临床实践中,低风险PCa中期待性管理的使用率稳步上升,而中风险组的使用率一直较低。虽然高龄或有合并症的患者更有可能接受期待性管理,但其使用在不同地理区域存在很大差异。我们的研究结果提醒人们注意期待性管理实施过程中存在的多种障碍。