Wong Ken C L, Summers Ronald M, Kebebew Electron, Yao Jianhua
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2014;17(Pt 2):25-32. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10470-6_4.
Tumor growth prediction is usually achieved by physiological modeling and model personalization from clinical measurements. Although image-based frameworks have been proposed with promising results, different issues such as infinitesimal strain assumption, complicated optimization procedures, and lack of functional information, may limit the prediction performance. Therefore, we propose a framework which comprises a hyperelastic biomechanical model for better physiological plausibility, gradient-free nonlinear optimization for more flexible choices of models and objective functions, and physiological data fusion of structural and functional images for better subject-specificity. Experiments were performed on synthetic and clinical data to verify parameter estimation capability and prediction performance of the framework. Comparisons of using different biomechanical models and objective functions were also performed. From the experimental results on eight patient data sets, the recall, precision, and relative volume difference (RVD) between predicted and measured tumor volumes are 84.85 ± 6.15%, 87.08 ± 7.83%, and 13.81 ± 6.64% respectively.
肿瘤生长预测通常通过生理建模以及根据临床测量进行模型个性化来实现。尽管已经提出了基于图像的框架并取得了有前景的结果,但诸如无穷小应变假设、复杂的优化程序以及缺乏功能信息等不同问题,可能会限制预测性能。因此,我们提出了一个框架,该框架包括一个具有更好生理合理性的超弹性生物力学模型、用于更灵活选择模型和目标函数的无梯度非线性优化,以及用于更好的个体特异性的结构和功能图像的生理数据融合。在合成数据和临床数据上进行了实验,以验证该框架的参数估计能力和预测性能。还进行了使用不同生物力学模型和目标函数的比较。从对八个患者数据集的实验结果来看,预测肿瘤体积与测量肿瘤体积之间的召回率、精确率和相对体积差异(RVD)分别为84.85±6.15%、87.08±7.83%和13.81±6.64%。