School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Environ Int. 2015 Feb;75:223-33. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.11.020. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
Amending soil with biosolids or livestock manure provides essential nutrients in agriculture. Irrigation with wastewater allows for agriculture in regions where water resources are limited. However, biosolids, manure and wastewater have all been shown to contain pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs). Studies have shown that PPCPs can accumulate in the tissues of plants but the risk that accumulated residues may pose to humans via consumption of edible portions is not well documented. This study reviewed the literature for studies that reported residues of PPCPs in the edible tissue of plants grown in biosolids- or manure-amended soils or irrigated with wastewater. These residues were used to determine the estimated daily intake of PPCPs for an adult and toddler. Estimated daily intake values were compared to acceptable daily intakes to determine whether PPCPs in plant tissue pose a hazard to human health. For all three amendment practices, the majority of reported residues resulted in hazard quotients <0.1. Amendment with biosolids or manure resulted in hazard quotients ≥0.1 for carbamazepine, diphenhydramine, salbutamol, triclosan, and sulfamethazine. Irrigation with wastewater resulted in hazard quotients of ≥0.1 for ambrettolid, carbamazepine, diclofenac, flunixin, lamotrigine, metoprolol, naproxen, sildenafil and tonalide. [corrected]. Many of the residues that resulted in hazard quotients ≥0.1 were due to exposing plants to concentrations of PPCPs that would not be considered relevant based on concentrations reported in biosolids and manure or unrealistic methods of exposure, which lead to artificially elevated plant residues. Our assessment indicates that the majority of individual PPCPs in the edible tissue of plants due to biosolids or manure amendment or wastewater irrigation represent a de minimis risk to human health. Assuming additivity, the mixture of PPCPs could potentially present a hazard. Further work needs to be done to assess the risk of the mixture of PPCPs that may be present in edible tissue of plants grown under these three amendment practices.
利用生物固体或牲畜粪便改良土壤为农业提供了必需的养分。利用废水进行灌溉使得在水资源有限的地区也能进行农业生产。然而,生物固体、粪便和废水都已被证明含有药品和个人护理产品(PPCPs)。研究表明,PPCPs 可以在植物组织中积累,但通过食用可食用部分积累的残留物质可能对人类造成的风险尚未得到充分记录。本研究综述了报道在生物固体或粪便改良土壤中种植的植物或用废水灌溉的植物的可食用组织中存在 PPCPs 残留的文献。这些残留物质被用来确定成年人和幼儿对 PPCPs 的估计每日摄入量。将估计的每日摄入量值与可接受的每日摄入量进行比较,以确定植物组织中的 PPCPs 是否对人类健康构成危害。对于所有三种改良措施,大多数报告的残留物质导致的危害系数均<0.1。生物固体或粪便改良导致卡马西平、苯海拉明、沙丁胺醇、三氯生和磺胺甲恶唑的危害系数≥0.1。废水灌溉导致安布瑞汀、卡马西平、双氯芬酸、氟尼辛、拉莫三嗪、美托洛尔、萘普生、西地那非和托那定的危害系数≥0.1。[修正]。导致危害系数≥0.1 的许多残留物质是由于将植物暴露于不会被认为与生物固体和粪便中报告的浓度或不切实际的暴露方法相关的 PPCPs 浓度下,从而导致植物残留人为升高。我们的评估表明,由于生物固体或粪便改良或废水灌溉,植物可食用组织中大多数 PPCPs 对人类健康的风险极小。假设加性,混合物中的 PPCPs 可能存在潜在危害。需要进一步开展工作,以评估在这三种改良措施下生长的植物的可食用组织中存在的 PPCPs 混合物的风险。