• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一(评价)来自多(观察):影响群体中个体对声音行为评估的因素。

One (rating) from many (observations): Factors affecting the individual assessment of voice behavior in groups.

机构信息

Department of Management and Organizations.

Department of Organization and Human Resources, School of Management, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jul;100(4):1189-202. doi: 10.1037/a0038479. Epub 2014 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1037/a0038479
PMID:25486258
Abstract

This article reports an investigation into how individuals form perceptions of overall voice behavior in group contexts. More specifically, the authors examine the effect of the proportion of group members exhibiting voice behavior in the group, the frequency of voice events in the group, and the measurement item referent (group vs. individual) on an individual's ratings of group voice behavior. In addition, the authors examine the effect that measurement item referent has on the magnitude of the relationship observed between an individual's ratings of group voice behavior and perceptions of group performance. Consistent with hypotheses, the results from 1 field study (N = 220) and 1 laboratory experiment (N = 366) indicate that: (a) When group referents were used, raters relied on the frequency of voice events (and not the proportion of group members exhibiting voice) to inform their ratings of voice behavior, whereas the opposite was true when individual-referent items were used, and (b) the magnitude of the relationship between observers' ratings of group voice behavior and their perceptions of group performance was higher when raters used group-referent, as opposed to an individual-referent, items. The authors discuss the implications of their findings for scholars interested in studying behavioral phenomena occurring in teams, groups, and work units in organizational behavior research.

摘要

本文报告了一项关于个体如何在群体环境中形成整体声音行为感知的调查。更具体地说,作者研究了群体中表现出声音行为的成员比例、群体中声音事件的频率以及测量项目的参照(群体与个体)对个体对群体声音行为的评价的影响。此外,作者还研究了测量项目参照对个体对群体声音行为的评价与对群体绩效的感知之间观察到的关系的大小的影响。与假设一致,来自 1 项现场研究(N=220)和 1 项实验室实验(N=366)的结果表明:(a)当使用群体参照时,评价者依赖声音事件的频率(而不是表现出声音行为的群体成员的比例)来告知他们对声音行为的评价,而当使用个体参照项目时则相反;(b)当评价者使用群体参照而不是个体参照项目时,观察者对群体声音行为的评价与他们对群体绩效的感知之间的关系的大小更高。作者讨论了他们的发现对组织行为研究中对团队、群体和工作单位中发生的行为现象感兴趣的学者的意义。

相似文献

1
One (rating) from many (observations): Factors affecting the individual assessment of voice behavior in groups.一(评价)来自多(观察):影响群体中个体对声音行为评估的因素。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jul;100(4):1189-202. doi: 10.1037/a0038479. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
2
Effects of message, source, and context on evaluations of employee voice behavior.信息、来源和情境对员工建言行为评价的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Jan;97(1):159-82. doi: 10.1037/a0024871. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
3
Individual deals within teams: Investigating the role of relative i-deals for employee performance.团队中的个人交易:研究相对 i-Deal 对员工绩效的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Nov;101(11):1536-1552. doi: 10.1037/apl0000145. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
4
The content of the message matters: The differential effects of promotive and prohibitive team voice on team productivity and safety performance gains.信息内容很重要:促进性和禁止性团队发声对团队生产力和安全绩效增益的差异影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Aug;102(8):1259-1270. doi: 10.1037/apl0000215. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
5
A preliminary investigation of the vocal behaviors and characteristics of female pastors.对女性牧师的发声行为和特征的初步调查。
J Voice. 2009 Sep;23(5):594-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.01.002. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
6
Public speaking in social phobia: a pilot study of self-ratings and observers' ratings of social skills.社交恐惧症中的公众演讲:自我评估和观察者对社交技能评估的初步研究。
J Clin Psychol. 2012 Apr;68(4):397-402. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20868. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
7
Two experimental tests of relational models of procedural justice: non-instrumental voice and authority group membership.程序性正义关系模型的两项实验测试:非工具性发言权和权威群体成员身份。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2013 Jun;52(2):361-76. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02083.x. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
8
Speaking up in groups: a cross-level study of group voice climate and voice.群体发声:群体发声氛围与发声行为的跨层次研究
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jan;96(1):183-91. doi: 10.1037/a0020744.
9
Referent cognitions theory: the role of closeness of reference points in the psychology of voice.参照认知理论:参照点的接近程度在语音心理学中的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Oct;81(4):616-26.
10
Say it as it is: Consequences of voice directness, voice politeness, and voicer credibility on voice endorsement.直言不讳、礼貌和可信的声音对声音背书的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 May;104(5):642-658. doi: 10.1037/apl0000358. Epub 2018 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
I Treated the Way You Treated Me: The Effect of Leader Hypocrisy on Employees' Voice Behavior.我以你对待我的方式对待你:领导者虚伪对员工建言行为的影响。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Mar 20;17:1339-1353. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S450359. eCollection 2024.
2
The quality of crowdsourcing virtual community and users' voice behavior: An analysis of stimulus-organism-response framework among Chinese users.众包虚拟社区的质量与用户发声行为:基于中国用户的刺激—机体—反应框架分析
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 22;10(5):e26881. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26881. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.