Acevedo Andrea, Garnick Deborah W, Dunigan Robert, Horgan Constance M, Ritter Grant A, Lee Margaret T, Panas Lee, Campbell Kevin, Haberlin Karin, Lambert-Wacey Dawn, Leeper Tracy, Reynolds Mark, Wright David
Institute for Behavioral Health, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, The Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery, Olympia, Washington.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2015 Jan;76(1):57-67.
A limited literature on racial/ethnic disparities in the treatment of substance use disorders suggests that quality of treatment may differ based on client's race/ethnicity. This study examined whether (a) disparities exist in the probability of treatment engagement, a performance measure for substance use disorders, and (b) treatment engagement is associated with similar reductions in likelihood of arrest for Whites, Blacks, Latinos, and American Indians.
Adult clients who began an outpatient treatment episode in 2008 in public sector specialty treatment facilities in Connecticut, New York, Oklahoma, and Washington made up the sample (N = 108,654). Administrative treatment data were linked to criminal justice data. The criminal justice outcome was defined as an arrest within a year after beginning treatment. Engagement is defined as receiving a treatment service within 14 days of beginning a new outpatient treatment episode and at least two additional services within the next 30 days. Two-step Heckman probit models and hierarchical time-to-event models were used in the analyses.
Black clients in New York and American Indian clients in Washington had significantly lower likelihood of engagement than White clients. As moderators of engagement, race/ethnicity had inconsistent effects across states on the hazard of arrest.
Racial/ethnic minority groups may benefit from additional treatment support to reduce criminal justice involvement. States should examine whether disparities exist within their treatment system and incorporate disparities reduction in their quality improvement initiatives.
关于物质使用障碍治疗中种族/族裔差异的文献有限,这表明治疗质量可能因客户的种族/族裔而异。本研究调查了:(a)在治疗参与可能性方面是否存在差异,治疗参与可能性是物质使用障碍的一项绩效指标;以及(b)治疗参与与白人、黑人、拉丁裔和美国印第安人被捕可能性的类似降低是否相关。
样本包括2008年在康涅狄格州、纽约州、俄克拉荷马州和华盛顿州的公共部门专科治疗机构开始门诊治疗的成年客户(N = 108,654)。将行政治疗数据与刑事司法数据相链接。刑事司法结果定义为开始治疗后一年内被捕。参与定义为在开始新的门诊治疗疗程后的14天内接受一次治疗服务,并在接下来的30天内至少再接受两次服务。分析中使用了两步赫克曼概率模型和分层事件发生时间模型。
纽约的黑人客户和华盛顿的美国印第安客户参与治疗的可能性明显低于白人客户。作为参与的调节因素,种族/族裔在各州对被捕风险的影响不一致。
种族/族裔少数群体可能会从额外的治疗支持中受益,以减少刑事司法介入。各州应检查其治疗系统内是否存在差异,并将减少差异纳入其质量改进举措中。