Suppr超能文献

印度六个城市的手术部位感染率:国际医院感染控制联盟(INICC)的调查结果。

Surgical site infection rates in six cities of India: findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC).

作者信息

Singh Sanjeev, Chakravarthy Murali, Rosenthal Victor Daniel, Myatra Sheila N, Dwivedy Arpita, Bagasrawala Iqbal, Munshi Nita, Shah Sweta, Panigrahi Bishnu, Sood Sanjeev, Kumar-Nair Pravin, Radhakrishnan Kavitha, Gokul B N, Sukanya R, Pushparaj L, Pramesh C S, Shrikhande S V, Gulia A, Puri A, Moiyadi A, Divatia J V, Kelkar Rohini, Biswas Sanjay, Raut Sandhya, Sampat Sulochana, Shetty Suvin, Binu Sheena, Pinto Preethi, Arora Sohini, Kamble Asmita, Kumari Neelakshi, Mendonca Angelina, Singhal Tanu, Naik Reshma, Kothari Vatsal, Sharma Bindu, Verma Neeru, Khanna D K, Chacko Felcy

机构信息

Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Center, Kochi, India.

Fortis Hospital, Bangalore, India.

出版信息

Int Health. 2015 Sep;7(5):354-9. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihu089. Epub 2014 Dec 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections are a threat to patient safety. However, in India, data on their rates stratified by surgical procedure are not available.

METHODS

From January 2005 to December 2011, the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) conducted a cohort prospective surveillance study on surgical site infections in 10 hospitals in 6 Indian cities. CDC National Healthcare Safety Network (CDC-NHSN) methods were applied and surgical procedures were classified into 11 types, according to the ninth edition of the International Classification of Diseases.

RESULTS

We documented 1189 surgical site infections, associated with 28 340 surgical procedures (4.2%; 95% CI: 4.0-4.4). Surgical site infections rates were compared with INICC and CDC-NHSN reports, respectively: 4.3% for coronary bypass with chest and donor incision (4.5% vs 2.9%); 8.3% for breast surgery (1.7% vs 2.3%); 6.5% for cardiac surgery (5.6% vs 1.3%); 6.0% for exploratory abdominal surgery (4.1% vs 2.0%), among others.

CONCLUSIONS

In most types of surgical procedures, surgical site infections rates were higher than those reported by the CDC-NHSN, but similar to INICC. This study is an important advancement towards the knowledge of surgical site infections epidemiology in the participating Indian hospitals that will allow us to introduce targeted interventions.

摘要

背景

手术部位感染对患者安全构成威胁。然而,在印度,尚无按手术程序分层的感染率数据。

方法

2005年1月至2011年12月,国际医院感染控制协会(INICC)在印度6个城市的10家医院开展了一项关于手术部位感染的队列前瞻性监测研究。采用美国疾病控制与预防中心国家医疗安全网络(CDC-NHSN)的方法,并根据《国际疾病分类》第九版将手术程序分为11种类型。

结果

我们记录了1189例手术部位感染,涉及28340例手术(4.2%;95%可信区间:4.0-4.4)。分别将手术部位感染率与INICC和CDC-NHSN的报告进行比较:胸部和供体切口的冠状动脉搭桥手术为4.3%(4.5%对2.9%);乳房手术为8.3%(1.7%对2.3%);心脏手术为6.5%(5.6%对1.3%);剖腹探查术为6.0%(4.1%对2.0%)等。

结论

在大多数类型的手术中,手术部位感染率高于CDC-NHSN报告的水平,但与INICC的报告相似。本研究是了解参与研究的印度医院手术部位感染流行病学的一项重要进展,将有助于我们采取有针对性的干预措施。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验