Sutton Jolene T, Robertson Bruce C, Jamieson Ian G
Department of Zoology, Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, University of Otago, 340 Great King Street, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand; Department of Biology, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Edmondson Hall, 2538 McCarthy Mall, Honolulu, HI, 96822-2233, USA.
Mol Ecol. 2015 Jan;24(2):362-73. doi: 10.1111/mec.13039. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
Most empirical evidence suggests that balancing selection does not counter the effects of genetic drift in shaping postbottleneck major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genetic diversity when population declines are severe or prolonged. However, few studies have been able to include data from historical specimens, or to compare populations/species with different bottleneck histories. In this study, we examined MHC class II B and microsatellite diversity in four New Zealand passerine (songbird) species that experienced moderate to very severe declines. We compared diversity from historical samples (collected c. 1884-1938) to present-day populations. Using a Bayesian framework, we found that the change in genetic diversity from historical to contemporary samples was affected by three main factors: (i) whether the data were based on MHC or microsatellite markers, (ii) species (as a surrogate for bottleneck severity) and (iii) whether the comparison between historical and contemporary samples was made using historical samples originating from the mainland, or using historical samples originating from islands. The greatest losses in genetic diversity occurred for the most severely bottlenecked species, particularly between historical mainland and contemporary samples. Additionally, where loss of diversity occurred, the change was greater for MHC genes compared to microsatellite loci.
大多数实证证据表明,当种群严重衰退或长期减少时,平衡选择无法抵消遗传漂变在塑造瓶颈后主要组织相容性复合体(MHC)遗传多样性方面的影响。然而,很少有研究能够纳入来自历史标本的数据,或者比较具有不同瓶颈历史的种群/物种。在本研究中,我们检测了四种经历了中度到非常严重衰退的新西兰雀形目(鸣禽)物种的MHC II类B基因和微卫星多样性。我们将历史样本(采集于约1884年至1938年)的多样性与当今种群的多样性进行了比较。使用贝叶斯框架,我们发现从历史样本到当代样本的遗传多样性变化受三个主要因素影响:(i)数据是基于MHC还是微卫星标记,(ii)物种(作为瓶颈严重程度的替代指标),以及(iii)历史样本与当代样本之间的比较是使用源自大陆的历史样本,还是使用源自岛屿的历史样本。遗传多样性损失最大的是瓶颈最严重的物种,特别是在历史大陆样本与当代样本之间。此外,在发生多样性损失的地方,与微卫星位点相比,MHC基因的变化更大。