Suppr超能文献

反馈和定制支持后,糖尿病护理小组和门诊的质量管理变化。

Change in quality management in diabetes care groups and outpatient clinics after feedback and tailored support.

机构信息

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands

Center for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2015 Feb;38(2):285-92. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1860. Epub 2014 Dec 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the change in level of diabetes quality management in primary care groups and outpatient clinics after feedback and tailored support.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This before-and-after study with a 1-year follow-up surveyed quality managers on six domains of quality management. Questionnaires measured organization of care, multidisciplinary teamwork, patient centeredness, performance results, quality improvement policy, and management strategies (score range 0-100%). Based on the scores, responders received feedback and a benchmark and were granted access to a toolbox of quality improvement instruments. If requested, additional support in improving quality management was available, consisting of an elucidating phone call or a visit from an experienced consultant. After 1 year, the level of quality management was measured again.

RESULTS

Of the initially 60 participating care groups, 51 completed the study. The total quality management score improved from 59.8% (95% CI 57.0-62.6%) to 65.1% (62.8-67.5%; P < 0.0001). The same applied to all six domains. The feedback and benchmark improved the total quality management score (P = 0.001). Of the 44 participating outpatient clinics, 28 completed the study. Their total score changed from 65.7% (CI 60.3-71.1%) to 67.3% (CI 62.9-71.7%; P = 0.30). Only the results in the domain multidisciplinary teamwork improved (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Measuring quality management and providing feedback and a benchmark improves the level of quality management in care groups but not in outpatient clinics. The questionnaires might also be a useful asset for other diabetes care groups, such as Accountable Care Organizations.

摘要

目的

评估在反馈和定制支持后初级保健组和门诊诊所的糖尿病质量管理水平变化。

研究设计和方法

这是一项具有 1 年随访的前后对照研究,调查了质量管理的六个领域的质量经理。问卷测量了护理组织、多学科团队合作、以患者为中心、绩效结果、质量改进政策和管理策略(得分范围 0-100%)。根据得分,回答者收到反馈和基准,并获得质量改进工具包的访问权限。如果需要,还可以提供额外的质量管理改进支持,包括澄清电话或经验丰富的顾问来访。1 年后,再次测量质量管理水平。

结果

最初参与的 60 个护理组中,有 51 个完成了研究。总体质量管理得分从 59.8%(95%CI 57.0-62.6%)提高到 65.1%(62.8-67.5%;P<0.0001)。所有六个领域均如此。反馈和基准提高了总体质量管理得分(P=0.001)。在 44 个参与的门诊诊所中,有 28 个完成了研究。他们的总得分从 65.7%(CI 60.3-71.1%)提高到 67.3%(CI 62.9-71.7%;P=0.30)。只有多学科团队合作领域的结果有所改善(P=0.001)。

结论

衡量质量管理并提供反馈和基准可以提高护理组的质量管理水平,但不能提高门诊诊所的水平。这些问卷也可能是其他糖尿病护理组(如责任医疗组织)的有用资产。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验