Suppr超能文献

患者参与糖尿病护理:九个糖尿病护理小组的经验

Patient involvement in diabetes care: experiences in nine diabetes care groups.

作者信息

Lemmens Lidwien C, de Bruin Simone R, Struijs Jeroen N, Rijken Mieke, Nijpels Giel, Baan Caroline A

机构信息

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

NIVEL Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Integr Care. 2015 Dec 15;15:e044. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2207. eCollection 2015 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite the expected beneficial effects on quality of care, patient involvement in diabetes care groups, which deliver a bundled paid integrated care programme for diabetes type 2, seems to be limited. The aim of this study was to gain insight into levels and methods of patient involvement, into facilitators and barriers, and into the future preferences of care groups and patient representatives.

THEORY AND METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were held with 10 representatives of care groups and 11 representatives of patient advocacy groups. An adapted version of Arnstein's ladder of citizen participation was used to define five levels of patient involvement.

RESULTS

Patient involvement in care groups was mostly limited to informing and consulting patients. Higher levels, i.e., advising, co-producing and decision-making, were less frequently observed. Care groups and patient representatives perceived largely the same barriers and facilitators and had similar preferences regarding future themes and design of patient involvement.

CONCLUSION

Constructive collaboration between diabetes care groups and patient representatives to enhance patient involvement in the future seems viable. Several issues such as the lack of evidence for effectiveness of patient involvement, differences in viewpoints on the role and responsibilities of care groups and perceived barriers need to be addressed.

摘要

引言

尽管预期对医疗质量会产生有益影响,但患者参与为2型糖尿病提供捆绑式付费综合护理计划的糖尿病护理小组的情况似乎有限。本研究的目的是深入了解患者参与的程度和方法、促进因素和障碍,以及护理小组和患者代表未来的偏好。

理论与方法

对10名护理小组代表和11名患者倡导组织代表进行了半结构化访谈。采用了改编版的阿恩斯坦公民参与阶梯来定义患者参与的五个层次。

结果

患者在护理小组中的参与大多仅限于向患者提供信息和咨询。较少观察到更高层次的参与,即提供建议、共同生产和决策。护理小组和患者代表在很大程度上感知到相同的障碍和促进因素,并且在未来患者参与的主题和设计方面有相似的偏好。

结论

糖尿病护理小组与患者代表之间为加强未来患者参与而进行的建设性合作似乎是可行的。需要解决几个问题,如缺乏患者参与有效性的证据、护理小组在角色和责任方面的观点差异以及感知到的障碍。

相似文献

1
Patient involvement in diabetes care: experiences in nine diabetes care groups.
Int J Integr Care. 2015 Dec 15;15:e044. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2207. eCollection 2015 Oct-Dec.
3
4
Barriers to payment reform: Experiences from nine Dutch population health management sites.
Health Policy. 2019 Nov;123(11):1100-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
7
Fathers and the well-child visit.
Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4):e637-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1612.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Qualitative Data Analysis Codebook for Arterial Hypertension and Type-2-Diabetes Integrated Care Evaluation.
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Mar 22;24(1):20. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7691. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
6
[Patient participation in the development and application of eHealth].
TSG. 2021;99(3):110-119. doi: 10.1007/s12508-021-00313-y. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
7
Designing a tool to support patient and public involvement in research projects: the Involvement Matrix.
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jun 16;6:30. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00188-4. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Change in quality management in diabetes care groups and outpatient clinics after feedback and tailored support.
Diabetes Care. 2015 Feb;38(2):285-92. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1860. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
2
Citizen participation and discontent in three Southern European health systems.
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Dec;123:226-33. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
3
4
Optimizing patient involvement in quality improvement.
Health Expect. 2013 Sep;16(3):e36-47. doi: 10.1111/hex.12039. Epub 2013 Feb 3.
5
Chronic Disease Management Programmes: an adequate response to patients' needs?
Health Expect. 2014 Oct;17(5):608-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00786.x. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
6
Citizens' participation in the Italian health-care system: the experience of the Mixed Advisory Committees.
Health Expect. 2014 Aug;17(4):488-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00775.x. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
8
What are the lessons from the USA for clinical commissioning groups in the English National Health Service?
Lancet. 2012 Jan 14;379(9811):189-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61088-X. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
9
Integrating care through bundled payments--lessons from The Netherlands.
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 17;364(11):990-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1011849.
10
Patient participation in collective healthcare decision making: the Dutch model.
Health Expect. 2010 Mar;13(1):73-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00567.x. Epub 2009 Aug 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验