van der Velde Laura A, Kiefte-de Jong Jessica C, Rutten Guy E, Vos Rimke C
Department of Public Health and Primary Care/LUMC-Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, Netherlands.
Department of General Practice, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Front Nutr. 2021 Mar 5;8:583125. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.583125. eCollection 2021.
An appropriate diet is an essential component of the management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). However, for many people with T2DM, self-management is difficult. Therefore, the Beyond Good Intentions (BGI) education program was developed based on self-regulation and proactive coping theories to enhance people's capabilities for self-management. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the BGI program on improving dietary quality among a preselected group of people with T2DM after two-and-a-half years follow-up. In this randomized controlled trial, 108 people with T2DM were randomized (1:1) to the intervention ( = 56) (BGI-program) or control group ( = 52) (care as usual). Linear regression analyses were used to determine the effect of the BGI program on change in dietary quality between baseline and two-and-a-half years follow-up. In addition, potential effect modification by having a nutritional goal at baseline was evaluated. Multiple imputation ( = 15 imputations) was performed to account for potential bias due to missing data. According to intention-to-treat analysis, participants in the intervention group showed greater improvements in dietary quality score than participants in the control group (β = 0.71; 95%CI: 0.09; 1.33) after follow-up. Having a nutritional goal at baseline had a moderating effect on the effectiveness of the BGI program on dietary quality (-interaction = 0.01), and stratified results showed that the favorable effect of the intervention on dietary quality was stronger for participants without a nutritional goal at baseline (no nutritional goal: β = 1.46; 95%CI: 0.65; 2.27 vs. nutritional goal: β = -0.24; 95%CI: -1.17; 0.69). The BGI program was significantly effective in improving dietary quality among preselected people with T2DM compared to care as usual. This effect was stronger among participants without a nutritional goal at baseline. A possible explanation for this finding is that persons with a nutritional goal at baseline already started improving their dietary intake before the start of the BGI program. Future studies are needed to elucidate the moderating role of goalsetting on the effectiveness of the BGI program.
合理饮食是2型糖尿病(T2DM)管理的重要组成部分。然而,对于许多T2DM患者来说,自我管理很困难。因此,基于自我调节和积极应对理论开发了“超越善意”(BGI)教育项目,以提高人们的自我管理能力。本研究的目的是在对一组预先选定的T2DM患者进行两年半的随访后,确定BGI项目对改善饮食质量的有效性。在这项随机对照试验中,108名T2DM患者被随机(1:1)分为干预组(n = 56)(BGI项目组)或对照组(n = 52)(常规护理组)。采用线性回归分析来确定BGI项目对基线至两年半随访期间饮食质量变化的影响。此外,还评估了基线时设定营养目标对潜在效应修正的影响。进行多次插补(15次插补)以解决因数据缺失导致的潜在偏差。根据意向性分析,随访后干预组参与者的饮食质量得分改善程度高于对照组参与者(β = 0.71;95%CI:0.09;1.33)。基线时设定营养目标对BGI项目改善饮食质量的有效性有调节作用(交互作用P = 0.01),分层结果显示,对于基线时未设定营养目标的参与者,干预对饮食质量的有利影响更强(未设定营养目标:β = 1.46;95%CI:0.65;2.27 vs.设定营养目标:β = -0.24;95%CI:-1.17;0.69)。与常规护理相比,BGI项目在改善预先选定的T2DM患者的饮食质量方面显著有效。在基线时未设定营养目标的参与者中,这种效果更强。这一发现的一个可能解释是,基线时设定营养目标的人在BGI项目开始之前就已经开始改善他们的饮食摄入。未来需要开展研究以阐明目标设定对BGI项目有效性的调节作用。