Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (S.A.M.K., P.N.F., A.S.N., D.M.K., J.G.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Penn Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality, and Evaluative Research Center (S.A.M.K., A.S.N., P.W.G., J.G.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e006094. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006094.
Patients and other providers have access to few publicly available physician attributes that identify interventional cardiologists with better postprocedural outcomes, particularly in states without public reporting of outcomes. Interventional cardiology board certification, maintenance of certification, graduation from a US medical school, medical school ranking, and length of practice represent such publicly available attributes. Previous studies on these measures have shown mixed results.
We included interventional cardiologists practicing in New York State in the years 2011 to 2013. The primary outcome was 30-day risk-standardized mortality rate (RSMR) after percutaneous coronary intervention. Hierarchical regression modeling was used to analyze the physician attributes and was adjusted for provider caseload. A total of 356 providers were studied. The average 30-day RSMR was 1.1 (SD=0.1) deaths per 100 cases for all percutaneous coronary interventions and 0.7 (SD=0.1) deaths per 100 cases for nonemergent procedures. The primary outcome was slightly lower among providers with interventional cardiology board certification compared with noncertified providers (1.06 [SD=0.14] versus 1.14 [SD=0.14] deaths per 100 cases; P<0.001). In multivariable hierarchical regression modeling, after adjusting for provider caseload, none of the physician attributes were associated with the primary outcome. Provider caseload was significantly associated with 30-day RSMR independent of the other attributes.
Interventional cardiology board-certified providers had a modestly lower 30-day RSMR before accounting for caseload. However, after adjusting for provider caseload, none of the examined publicly available physician attributes, including interventional cardiology board certification, were independently associated with 30-day RSMR.
患者和其他医疗服务提供者可获取的能够识别介入心脏病学医生术后结果更好的公开医生属性很少,在没有结果公开报告的州尤其如此。介入心脏病学委员会认证、维持认证、毕业于美国医学院、医学院排名和从业时间等代表了此类公开属性。此前关于这些措施的研究结果喜忧参半。
我们纳入了 2011 年至 2013 年期间在纽约州执业的介入心脏病学家。主要结局是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 30 天风险标准化死亡率(RSMR)。采用层次回归模型分析医生属性,并根据提供者的病例量进行调整。共研究了 356 名医生。所有经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的平均 30 天 RSMR 为每 100 例 1.1(SD=0.1)例死亡,非紧急手术为每 100 例 0.7(SD=0.1)例死亡。与未认证的医生相比,具有介入心脏病学委员会认证的医生的主要结局略低(每 100 例 1.06(SD=0.14)例与 1.14(SD=0.14)例死亡;P<0.001)。在多变量层次回归模型中,在校正了提供者的病例量后,没有医生属性与主要结局相关。除其他属性外,提供者的病例量与 30 天 RSMR 显著相关。
在考虑病例量之前,具有介入心脏病学委员会认证的医生的 30 天 RSMR 略有降低。然而,在校正了提供者的病例量后,没有研究中检查的任何公开医生属性(包括介入心脏病学委员会认证)与 30 天 RSMR 独立相关。