Marshall Andrew T, Smith Aaron P, Kirkpatrick Kimberly
Kansas State University.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2014 Jul;102(1):86-101. doi: 10.1002/jeab.88. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
Impulsive choice behavior incorporates the psychological mechanisms involved in the processing of the anticipated magnitude and delay until reward. The goal of the present experiment was to determine whether individual differences in such processes related to individual differences in impulsive choice behavior. Two groups of rats (Delay Group and Magnitude Group) were initially exposed to an impulsive choice task with choices between smaller-sooner (SS) and larger-later (LL) rewards. The Delay Group was subsequently exposed to a temporal discrimination task followed by a progressive interval task, whereas the Magnitude Group was exposed to a reward magnitude sensitivity task followed by a progressive ratio task. Intertask correlations revealed that the rats in the Delay Group that made more self-controlled (LL) choices also displayed lower standard deviations in the temporal bisection task and greater delay tolerance in the progressive interval task. Impulsive choice behavior in the Magnitude Group did not display any substantial correlations with the reward magnitude sensitivity and progressive ratio tasks. The results indicate the importance of core timing processes in impulsive choice behavior, and encourage further research examining the effects of changes in core timing processes on impulsive choice.
冲动选择行为包含了在处理预期奖励大小和延迟直至获得奖励过程中涉及的心理机制。本实验的目的是确定这些过程中的个体差异是否与冲动选择行为中的个体差异相关。两组大鼠(延迟组和大小组)最初被置于一个冲动选择任务中,在较小-较早(SS)和较大-较晚(LL)奖励之间进行选择。延迟组随后接受了一个时间辨别任务,接着是一个累进间隔任务,而大小组则接受了一个奖励大小敏感性任务,随后是一个累进比率任务。任务间的相关性显示,在延迟组中做出更多自我控制(LL)选择的大鼠在时间二等分任务中也表现出更低的标准差,并且在累进间隔任务中具有更高的延迟耐受性。大小组中的冲动选择行为与奖励大小敏感性和累进比率任务没有显示出任何显著的相关性。结果表明核心时间过程在冲动选择行为中的重要性,并鼓励进一步研究核心时间过程的变化对冲动选择的影响。