Suppr超能文献

单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与微创后路颈椎椎间孔切开术治疗神经根型颈椎病的成本分析

Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a cost analysis.

作者信息

Mansfield Haley E, Canar W Jeffrey, Gerard Carter S, O'Toole John E

机构信息

Departments of Neurological Surgery and.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2014 Nov;37(5):E9. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.FOCUS14373.

Abstract

OBJECT

Patients suffering from cervical radiculopathy in whom a course of nonoperative treatment has failed are often candidates for a single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF). The objective of this analysis was to identify any significant cost differences between these surgical methods by comparing direct costs to the hospital. Furthermore, patient-specific characteristics were also considered for their effect on component costs.

METHODS

After obtaining approval from the medical center institutional review board, the authors conducted a retrospective cross-sectional comparative cohort study, with a sample of 101 patients diagnosed with cervical radiculopathy and who underwent an initial single-level ACDF or minimally invasive PCF during a 3-year period. Using these data, bivariate analyses were conducted to determine significant differences in direct total procedure and component costs between surgical techniques. Factorial ANOVAs were also conducted to determine any relationship between patient sex and smoking status to the component costs per surgery.

RESULTS

The mean total direct cost for an ACDF was $8192, and the mean total direct cost for a PCF was $4320. There were significant differences in the cost components for direct costs and operating room supply costs. It was found that there was no statistically significant difference in component costs with regard to patient sex or smoking status.

CONCLUSIONS

In the management of single-level cervical radiculopathy, the present analysis has revealed that the average cost of an ACDF is 89% more than a PCF. This increased cost is largely due to the cost of surgical implants. These results do not appear to be dependent on patient sex or smoking status. When combined with results from previous studies highlighting the comparable patient outcomes for either procedure, the authors' findings suggest that from a health care economics standpoint, physicians should consider a minimally invasive PCF in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy.

摘要

目的

对于非手术治疗疗程失败的神经根型颈椎病患者,通常可选择单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)或颈椎后路椎间孔切开术(PCF)。本分析的目的是通过比较医院的直接成本,确定这些手术方法之间是否存在显著的成本差异。此外,还考虑了患者的特定特征对各组成部分成本的影响。

方法

在获得医疗中心机构审查委员会的批准后,作者进行了一项回顾性横断面比较队列研究,样本为101例被诊断为神经根型颈椎病且在3年期间接受初次单节段ACDF或微创PCF的患者。利用这些数据,进行双变量分析以确定手术技术之间直接总手术成本和各组成部分成本的显著差异。还进行了析因方差分析,以确定患者性别和吸烟状况与每次手术各组成部分成本之间的任何关系。

结果

ACDF的平均直接总成本为8192美元,PCF的平均直接总成本为4320美元。直接成本和手术室供应成本的组成部分存在显著差异。发现各组成部分成本在患者性别或吸烟状况方面无统计学显著差异。

结论

在单节段神经根型颈椎病的治疗中,本分析表明ACDF的平均成本比PCF高89%。成本增加主要归因于手术植入物的成本。这些结果似乎不依赖于患者性别或吸烟状况。结合先前研究强调两种手术具有可比患者结局的结果,作者的研究结果表明,从卫生保健经济学角度来看,医生在治疗神经根型颈椎病时应考虑微创PCF。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验