Suppr超能文献

微创后路颈椎椎间孔切开术与前路颈椎融合术及关节成形术:系统评价与Meta分析

Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Versus Anterior Cervical Fusion and Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Platt Andrew, Fessler Richard G, Traynelis Vincent C, O'Toole John E

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, 2468Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2022 Sep;12(7):1573-1582. doi: 10.1177/21925682211055094. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

Patients with lateral cervical disc and foraminal pathology can be treated with anterior and posterior approaches including anterior cervical discectomy and fusion(ACDF), cervical total disc arthroplasty(TDA), and minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy(MIS-PCF). Although MIS-PCF may have some advantages over the anterior approaches, few comparative studies and meta-analyses have been done to assess superiority.

METHODS

This study includes a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of studies directly comparing minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy to either anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or cervical total disc arthroplasty.

RESULTS

In comparing patients undergoing ACDF and MIS-PCF, operative time ranged from 68 to 97.8 minutes in the ACDF group compared to 28 to 93.9 minutes in the MIS-PCF group. Mean postoperative length of stay ranged from 33.84 to 112.8 hours in the ACDF group compared to 13.68 to 83.6 hours in the MIS-PCF group. The total complication rates were 3.72% in the ACDF group and 3.73% in the MIS-PCF group. A random-effects model meta-analysis was carried out which failed to show a statistically significant difference in the complication rate between the two procedures(OR .91; 95% CI 0.13, 6.43; P = .92, I = 59%). The total reoperation rate was 3.5% in the ACDF group and 5.4% in the MIS-PCF group. A random-effects model meta-analysis was carried out which failed to show a statistically significant difference in the reoperation rate between the two procedures(OR .66; 95% CI 0.33, 1.33; P = .25, I = 0). In comparing patients undergoing TDA and MIS-PCF, operative time ranged from 90.3 to 106.7 minutes in the TDA group compared to 77.4 to 93.9 minutes in the MIS-PCF group. Mean postoperative length of stay ranged from 103.2 to 165.6 hours in the TDA group and 93.6 to 98.4 hours in the MIS-PCF group. The complication rate ranged from 23.5 to 28.6% in the TDA group and 0 to 14.3% in the MIS-PCF group. The overall reoperation rates were 2.6% in the TDA group and 10.2% in the MIS-PCF group.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no clear superiority between MIS-PCF and ACDF/TDA in terms of operative time, postoperative length of stay, or rate of complications/reoperations. Further studies with increased follow-up intervals >48 months, and higher sample sizes are necessary to determine the true superiority of MIS-PCF and anterior neck approaches in treatment of lateral disc and foraminal pathology.

摘要

研究设计

系统评价与荟萃分析。

目的

患有外侧颈椎间盘及椎间孔病变的患者可采用前路和后路手术治疗,包括颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)、颈椎全椎间盘置换术(TDA)和微创后路颈椎椎间孔切开术(MIS - PCF)。尽管MIS - PCF可能比前路手术具有一些优势,但很少有比较研究和荟萃分析来评估其优越性。

方法

本研究包括对文献的系统评价以及对直接比较微创后路颈椎椎间孔切开术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术或颈椎全椎间盘置换术的研究进行荟萃分析。

结果

在比较接受ACDF和MIS - PCF的患者时,ACDF组的手术时间为68至97.8分钟,而MIS - PCF组为28至93.9分钟。ACDF组术后平均住院时间为33.84至112.8小时,而MIS - PCF组为13.68至83.6小时。ACDF组的总并发症发生率为3.72%,MIS - PCF组为3.73%。进行了随机效应模型荟萃分析,结果显示两种手术的并发症发生率无统计学显著差异(OR = 0.91;95% CI 0.13, 6.43;P = 0.92,I² = 59%)。ACDF组的总再次手术率为3.5%,MIS - PCF组为5.4%。进行了随机效应模型荟萃分析,结果显示两种手术的再次手术率无统计学显著差异(OR = 0.66;95% CI 0.33, 1.33;P = 0.25,I² = 0)。在比较接受TDA和MIS - PCF的患者时,TDA组的手术时间为90.3至106.7分钟,而MIS - PCF组为77.4至93.9分钟。TDA组术后平均住院时间为103.2至165.6小时,MIS - PCF组为93.6至98.4小时。TDA组的并发症发生率为23.5%至28.6%,MIS - PCF组为0至14.3%。TDA组的总体再次手术率为2.6%,MIS - PCF组为10.2%。

结论

在手术时间、术后住院时间或并发症/再次手术率方面,MIS - PCF与ACDF/TDA之间没有明显的优越性。需要进一步开展随访间隔大于48个月且样本量更大的研究,以确定MIS - PCF和前路手术在治疗外侧椎间盘及椎间孔病变方面的真正优越性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d46/9393980/7c9fbb2ee5ec/10.1177_21925682211055094-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验