Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan; Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jan;8(1):14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
This study hypothesized that regurgitation severity, as determined by using the regurgitant volume index, would better delineate differential cardiac dysfunction in asymptomatic patients with moderate to severe aortic regurgitation (AR) and mitral regurgitation (MR).
Frequent surveillance echocardiography is considered appropriate in asymptomatic patients with moderate to severe AR and MR. However, the evidence to support this practice and to define the appropriate frequency is limited.
This was an observational cohort study of consecutive patients with moderate to severe asymptomatic AR or MR who underwent exercise echocardiography. Our cohort included 130 patients with moderate to severe asymptomatic MR and 130 patients with moderate to severe asymptomatic AR who were matched according to age and regurgitant volume index. All patients underwent yearly echocardiographic follow-up studies. Regurgitation severity was determined according to regurgitant volume index, with a level ≥30 ml/m(2) considered a marker of severe regurgitation.
During follow-up, regardless of etiology, patients with severe regurgitation demonstrated increasing left ventricular volume indexes (4.2 ± 1.5 ml/m(2) per year; p = 0.01) and decreasing left ventricular ejection fractions (1.3 ± 0.4% per year; p = 0.002). In patients with moderate regurgitation, left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions did not significantly change. In addition, patients with severe regurgitation experienced a similar drop in contractility (end-systolic pressure/end-systolic volume ratio and single-beat pre-load recruitable stroke work) during follow-up independent of regurgitation etiology. Contractility parameters did not change in patients with moderate regurgitation.
These asymptomatic patients with moderate AR or MR had stable cardiac function during 3 years of follow-up; thus, frequent echocardiography without a change in clinical status may not be necessary. In the setting of severe regurgitation, further cardiac deterioration occurred at a similar rate and manner irrespective of whether the dysfunction was related to AR or MR.
本研究假设,通过反流容积指数(regurgitant volume index)确定的反流严重程度,将更好地区分无症状的中重度主动脉瓣反流(aortic regurgitation,AR)和二尖瓣反流(mitral regurgitation,MR)患者的不同程度的心脏功能障碍。
对于无症状的中重度 AR 和 MR 患者,通常认为需要进行频繁的超声心动图监测。然而,支持这种做法并确定合适监测频率的证据有限。
这是一项连续的观察性队列研究,纳入了接受运动超声心动图检查的无症状中重度 AR 或 MR 患者。我们的队列包括 130 例无症状中重度 MR 患者和 130 例无症状中重度 AR 患者,这些患者按照年龄和反流容积指数进行匹配。所有患者均接受了每年的超声心动图随访研究。反流严重程度根据反流容积指数确定,反流容积指数≥30ml/m²被认为是严重反流的标志物。
在随访期间,无论病因如何,重度反流患者的左心室容积指数均逐渐增加(每年 4.2±1.5ml/m²;p=0.01),左心室射血分数逐渐降低(每年 1.3±0.4%;p=0.002)。中度反流患者的左心室容积和射血分数无显著变化。此外,重度反流患者的收缩功能在随访期间也出现了类似的下降(收缩末期压力/收缩末期容积比和单次搏动前负荷可获取的做功),与反流病因无关。中度反流患者的收缩功能参数无变化。
在 3 年的随访中,这些无症状的中重度 AR 或 MR 患者的心脏功能稳定;因此,在没有临床状况改变的情况下,频繁的超声心动图检查可能不是必需的。在重度反流的情况下,进一步的心脏恶化发生的速度和方式相似,而不论功能障碍是由 AR 还是 MR 引起的。