• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[结肠镜检查的肠道准备。近期有任何重大进展吗?]

[Bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Any significant progress on the horizon?].

作者信息

Rivero-Sánchez Liseth, Pellisé María

机构信息

Unidad de Endoscopia, Servicio de Gastroenterología, Institut Clínic de Malalties Digestives i Metabòliques, Hospital Clínic, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, España.

Unidad de Endoscopia, Servicio de Gastroenterología, Institut Clínic de Malalties Digestives i Metabòliques, Hospital Clínic, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, España.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Apr;38(4):287-300. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.gastrohep.2014.10.008
PMID:25499609
Abstract

Colonoscopy is the method of choice for colorectal cancer screening. To be effective, screening colonoscopy must have high quality standards. The key element is the quality of the preparation. However, up to 20% of patients are inadequately prepared and, at present, anterograde washing is the least tolerated part of the procedure. In the choice of preparation, safety is a prerequisite and efficacy is a priority. Tolerance is a secondary but nevertheless influential factor in the quality of preparation and has consequently been the primary focus of many recent studies. In the last few years, a rapidly increasing number of studies have evaluated new drugs, dosages and adjuvant therapies to improve efficacy and tolerability. These studies have collaterally shown that inadequate preparation and lack of adherence to the prescribed regimen can be partially predicted, making it essential to identify this patient subgroup and invest the necessary effort in their instruction. New individualized and flexible approaches are expected for the different clinical scenarios. The search for the ideal colonoscopy preparation, which would be tolerable, safe and above all effective, remains open.

摘要

结肠镜检查是结直肠癌筛查的首选方法。为了有效,筛查结肠镜检查必须有高质量标准。关键因素是准备工作的质量。然而,高达20%的患者准备不充分,目前,顺行冲洗是该操作中最难以耐受的部分。在选择准备方法时,安全是前提,疗效是首要考虑因素。耐受性是准备工作质量的次要但仍有影响的因素,因此一直是近期许多研究的主要关注点。在过去几年中,越来越多的研究评估了新药、剂量和辅助治疗方法,以提高疗效和耐受性。这些研究附带表明,准备不充分和未遵守规定方案的情况可以部分预测,因此识别这一患者亚组并对他们进行必要的指导至关重要。针对不同临床情况,预计会有新的个性化和灵活的方法。寻找理想的结肠镜检查准备方法,即耐受性好、安全且最重要的是有效的方法,仍在继续。

相似文献

1
[Bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Any significant progress on the horizon?].[结肠镜检查的肠道准备。近期有任何重大进展吗?]
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Apr;38(4):287-300. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
2
Ascorbic acid PEG-2L is superior for early morning colonoscopies in colorectal cancer screening programs: a prospective non-randomized controlled trial.在结直肠癌筛查项目中,抗坏血酸聚乙二醇-2L在清晨结肠镜检查方面表现更优:一项前瞻性非随机对照试验。
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Feb;38(2):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
3
Split-dose bowel cleansing with picosulphate is safe and better tolerated than 2-l polyethylene glycol solution.与2升聚乙二醇溶液相比,分次服用比沙可啶进行肠道准备更安全且耐受性更好。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jul;30(7):709-717. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001120.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate for Bowel Preparation in a Physically Disabled Outpatient Population: A Randomized, Endoscopist-Blinded Comparison With Ascorbic Acid-Enriched Polyethylene Glycol Solution Plus Bisacodyl (The PICO-MOVI Study).在身体残疾的门诊人群中,以聚乙二醇电解质溶液联合比沙可啶作为对照,评价匹可硫酸钠/柠檬酸镁进行肠道准备的疗效和安全性:一项随机、内镜医师设盲比较的研究(PICO-MOVI 研究)。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Feb;61(2):239-249. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000956.
5
'Pico-Bello-Klean study': effectiveness and patient tolerability of bowel preparation agents sodium picosulphate-magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy. A single-blinded randomized trial.“皮科-贝洛-克莱恩研究”:结肠镜检查前肠道准备药物比沙可啶-枸橼酸镁和聚乙二醇的有效性及患者耐受性。一项单盲随机试验
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan;27(1):29-38. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000192.
6
A head-to-head comparison of 4-L polyethylene glycol and low-volume solutions before colonoscopy: which is the best? A multicentre, randomized trial.结肠镜检查前4升聚乙二醇与小容量溶液的直接比较:哪种最佳?一项多中心随机试验。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;32(12):1763-1766. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2901-x. Epub 2017 Sep 24.
7
A dual-action, low-volume bowel cleanser administered the day before colonoscopy: results from the SEE CLEAR II study.结肠镜检查前一天给予的双效、低容量肠道清洁剂:SEE CLEAR II 研究结果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;108(3):401-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.441. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
8
Time for individualized colonoscopy bowel-prep regimens? A randomized controlled trial comparing sodium picosulphate and magnesium citrate versus 4-liter split-dose polyethylene glycol.个体化结肠镜肠道准备方案的时间到了吗?一项比较匹克硫酸钠和柠檬酸镁与 4 升分剂量聚乙二醇的随机对照试验。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2013 Jun;22(2):129-34.
9
Polyethylene glycol versus sodium picosulfalte bowel preparation in the setting of a colorectal cancer screening program.在结直肠癌筛查项目中聚乙二醇与匹可硫酸钠肠道准备的比较
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Oct;29(7):384-90. doi: 10.1155/2015/350587. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
10
A prospective audit of the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of low-volume polyethylene glycol (2 L) versus standard volume polyethylene glycol (4 L) versus magnesium citrate plus stimulant laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy.前瞻性研究低容量聚乙二醇(2L)与标准容量聚乙二醇(4L)、枸橼酸镁联合刺激性泻药在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的疗效、安全性和可接受性。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug;46(7):595-601. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182432162.

引用本文的文献

1
One-day low-residue diet is equally effective as the multiple-day low-residue diet in achieving adequate bowel cleansing: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.一日低渣饮食在实现充分肠道清洁方面与多日低渣饮食同样有效:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Endosc. 2025 Jan;58(1):63-76. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.061. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
2
ADR evaluation of screening colonoscopies during 2016 - 2017 in a private health clinic in Peru.2016 - 2017年秘鲁一家私人健康诊所筛查性结肠镜检查的药物不良反应评估
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Nov;6(11):E1304-E1309. doi: 10.1055/a-0672-1045. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
3
Colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy in fecal immunochemical test-positive participants from a colorectal cancer screening program.
来自一项结直肠癌筛查项目中粪便免疫化学检测呈阳性但结肠镜检查结果为阴性的参与者发生的结直肠癌。
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Sep;6(9):E1140-E1148. doi: 10.1055/a-0650-4296. Epub 2018 Sep 11.