Rodríguez de Miguel C, Serradesanferm A, López-Cerón M, Carballal S, Pozo A, Balaguer F, Cárdenas A, Fernández-Esparrach G, Ginés A, González-Suárez B, Moreira L, Ordás I, Ricart E, Sendino O, Vaquero E C, Ubré M, del Manzano S, Grau J, Llach J, Castells A, Pellisé M
Department of Gastroenterology, Institut de Malalties Digestives i Metabòliques, Hospital Clínic, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Preventive Medicine and Hospital Epidemiology Department, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Feb;38(2):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
The quality of colon cleansing and the tolerability of anterograde preparation are essential to the success of colorectal cancer screening.
To compare the tolerability and efficacy of low-volume preparations vs the standard regimen in individuals scheduled for an early morning colonoscopy.
Participants in a population-based colorectal cancer screening program using the fecal immunochemical test who were scheduled for a colonoscopy from 09:00 a.m. to 10:20 a.m. were prospectively included and assigned to: (1) control group (PEG-ELS 4L): PEG 4L and electrolytes; (2) group AscPEG-2L: a combination of PEG and ascorbic acid 2L; and (3) group PiMg: sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate 500 mL plus 2L of clear fluids. Tolerability was evaluated with a questionnaire and the quality of bowel preparation with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale.
A total of 292 participants were included: 98 in the PEG-ELS 4L control group, 96 in the AscPEG-2L study group and 98 in the PiMg study group. Low-volume treatments were better tolerated than the standard solution (AscPEG-2L 94.8% and PiMg 93.9% vs PEG-ELS 4L 75.5%; p < 0.0001). The effectiveness of AscPEG-2L was superior to that of PEG-ELS 4L and PiMg (p = 0.011 and p = 0.032, respectively). Patient acceptance was higher for single-dose than for split-dose administration but efficacy was higher with the split dose than with other doses.
In early morning colonoscopies, ascPEG-2L appears to be the best option, especially when administered in a split-dose.
结肠清洁质量和顺行性肠道准备的耐受性对结直肠癌筛查的成功至关重要。
比较低容量肠道准备方案与标准方案在计划于清晨进行结肠镜检查的个体中的耐受性和疗效。
前瞻性纳入了基于人群的使用粪便免疫化学检测进行结直肠癌筛查项目中计划于上午9:00至10:20进行结肠镜检查的参与者,并将其分为:(1)对照组(PEG-ELS 4L):聚乙二醇4L和电解质;(2)AscPEG-2L组:聚乙二醇与维生素C的混合溶液2L;(3)PiMg组:匹可硫酸钠和枸橼酸镁500 mL加2L清亮液体。通过问卷评估耐受性,并用波士顿肠道准备量表评估肠道准备质量。
共纳入292名参与者:PEG-ELS 4L对照组98名,AscPEG-2L研究组96名,PiMg研究组98名。低容量治疗方案的耐受性优于标准溶液(AscPEG-2L为94.8%,PiMg为93.9%,而PEG-ELS 4L为75.5%;p < 0.0001)。AscPEG-2L的有效性优于PEG-ELS 4L和PiMg(分别为p = 0.011和p = 0.032)。单剂量给药的患者接受度高于分剂量给药,但分剂量给药的疗效高于其他剂量。
在清晨结肠镜检查中,AscPEG-2L似乎是最佳选择,尤其是分剂量给药时。