Martin D S, Cobb A, Meale P, Mitchell K, Edsell M, Mythen M G, Grocott M P W
UCLH NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Sport and Exercise Health, University College London Centre for Altitude Space and Extreme Environment Medicine, 170 Tottenham Court Road, London W1 T 7HA, UK
UCLH NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Sport and Exercise Health, University College London Centre for Altitude Space and Extreme Environment Medicine, 170 Tottenham Court Road, London W1 T 7HA, UK.
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Apr;114(4):677-82. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu404. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
Classic teaching suggests that diminished availability of oxygen leads to increased tissue oxygen extraction yet evidence to support this notion in the context of hypoxaemia, as opposed to anaemia or cardiac failure, is limited.
At 75 m above sea level, and after 7-8 days of acclimatization to 4559 m, systemic oxygen extraction [C(a-v)O2] was calculated in five participants at rest and at peak exercise. Absolute [C(a-v)O2] was calculated by subtracting central venous oxygen content (CcvO2) from arterial oxygen content [Formula: see text] in blood sampled from central venous and peripheral arterial catheters, respectively. Oxygen uptake [Formula: see text] was determined from expired gas analysis during exercise.
Ascent to altitude resulted in significant hypoxaemia; median (range) [Formula: see text] 87.1 (82.5-90.7)% and [Formula: see text] 6.6 (5.7-6.8) kPa. While absolute C(a-v)O2 was reduced at maximum exercise at 4559 m [83.9 (67.5-120.9) ml litre(-1) vs 99.6 (88.0-151.3) ml litre(-1) at 75 m, P=0.043], there was no change in oxygen extraction ratio (OER) [C(a-v)O2/CaO2] between the two altitudes [0.52 (0.48-0.71) at 4559 m and 0.53 (0.49-0.73) at 75 m, P=0.500]. Comparison of C(a-v)O2 at peak [Formula: see text] at 4559 m and the equivalent [Formula: see text] at sea level for each participant also revealed no significant difference [83.9 (67.5-120.9) ml litre(1) vs 81.2 (73.0-120.7) ml litre(-1), respectively, P=0.225].
In acclimatized individuals at 4559 m, there was a decline in maximum absolute C(a-v)O2 during exercise but no alteration in OER calculated using central venous oxygen measurements. This suggests that oxygen extraction may have become limited after exposure to 7-8 days of hypoxaemia.
传统理论认为,氧供应减少会导致组织氧摄取增加,但在低氧血症(与贫血或心力衰竭不同)情况下支持这一观点的证据有限。
在海拔75米处,以及在适应了4559米高度7 - 8天后,对5名参与者在静息和运动峰值状态下的全身氧摄取量[C(a - v)O₂]进行了计算。绝对[C(a - v)O₂]通过分别从中心静脉和外周动脉导管采集的血液中,用动脉血氧含量减去中心静脉血氧含量来计算[公式:见正文]。运动期间的摄氧量[公式:见正文]通过呼出气分析来测定。
上升到高原导致显著的低氧血症;中位数(范围)[公式:见正文]为87.1(82.5 - 90.7)%,[公式:见正文]为6.6(5.7 - 6.8)千帕。虽然在4559米处最大运动时绝对C(a - v)O₂降低[83.9(67.5 - 120.9)毫升·升⁻¹ 对比75米处的99.6(88.0 - 151.3)毫升·升⁻¹,P = 0.043],但两个海拔高度之间的氧摄取率(OER)[C(a - v)O₂/CaO₂]没有变化[4559米处为0.52(0.48 - 0.71),75米处为0.53(0.49 - 0.73),P = 0.500]。对每个参与者在4559米处运动峰值时的[公式:见正文]C(a - v)O₂与海平面处的等效[公式:见正文]进行比较,也未发现显著差异[分别为83.9(67.5 - 120.9)毫升·升⁻¹ 对比81.2(73.0 - 120.7)毫升·升⁻¹,P = 0.225]。
在适应了4559米高度的个体中,运动期间最大绝对C(a - v)O₂有所下降,但使用中心静脉氧测量计算的OER没有改变。这表明在暴露于7 - 8天的低氧血症后,氧摄取可能已受到限制。