• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血清间皮素联合胸腔积液细胞学阴性对恶性胸膜间皮瘤的诊断价值。

Mesothelin in serum and pleural effusion in the diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma with non-positive cytology.

机构信息

Division of Histopathology and Cytopathology, Azienda Sanitaria Locale n° 5, La Spezia, Italy.

Division of Pneumology, Azienda Sanitaria Locale n° 5, La Spezia, Italy.

出版信息

Anticancer Res. 2014 Dec;34(12):7425-9.

PMID:25503183
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Mesothelin (SMRP) is regarded as a biomarker of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Herein, we analyzed the contribution of SMRP detection in pleural effusion and in serum to the diagnosis of MPM with non-positive cytology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study included 52 cases of MPM, 43 of pleural benign lesions and 25 of non-MPM pleural metastases. SMRP was measured by MesoMark ELISA (Cis-Bio International Gif/Yvette; France).

RESULTS

In non-positive cytology, effusion-SMRP showed higher diagnostic performance than serum-SMRP. We found 38 out of 52 (73.1%) cases of non-positive cytology MPM, out of which 27 (71.0%) were positive for effusion-SMRP (cut-off=12.70 nM) and 18 (47.4%) for serum-SMRP (cut-off=1.08 nM). When cytology, effusion- and serum-SMRP were used in combination, an overall sensitivity in detection of MPM of 78.9% was achieved. The same sensitivity was obtained by combining cytology with effusion-SMRP alone, whereas the combination of serum-SMRP with cytology led to a sensitivity of 61.5%.

CONCLUSION

Detection of both effusion- and serum-SMRP can contribute to improve the diagnosis of MPM with non-positive cytology. However, the analysis of SMRP in effusion makes it unnecessary to test SMRP in the serum.

摘要

背景/目的:间皮素(SMRP)被认为是恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)的生物标志物。在此,我们分析了胸腔积液和血清中 SMRP 检测对非阳性细胞学的 MPM 的诊断贡献。

材料和方法

本研究包括 52 例 MPM、43 例胸膜良性病变和 25 例非 MPM 胸膜转移。SMRP 通过 MesoMark ELISA(Cis-Bio International Gif/Yvette;法国)进行测量。

结果

在非阳性细胞学中,胸腔积液-SMRP 比血清-SMRP 具有更高的诊断性能。我们发现 52 例非阳性细胞学 MPM 中有 38 例(73.1%),其中 27 例(71.0%)胸腔积液-SMRP 阳性(cut-off=12.70 nM),18 例(47.4%)血清-SMRP 阳性(cut-off=1.08 nM)。当细胞学、胸腔积液和血清-SMRP 联合使用时,对 MPM 的总检测敏感性为 78.9%。单独结合细胞学和胸腔积液-SMRP 也可获得相同的敏感性,而血清-SMRP 与细胞学联合使用的敏感性为 61.5%。

结论

检测胸腔积液和血清中的 SMRP 均可有助于提高非阳性细胞学 MPM 的诊断。然而,分析胸腔积液中的 SMRP 使得检测血清中的 SMRP 变得不必要。

相似文献

1
Mesothelin in serum and pleural effusion in the diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma with non-positive cytology.血清间皮素联合胸腔积液细胞学阴性对恶性胸膜间皮瘤的诊断价值。
Anticancer Res. 2014 Dec;34(12):7425-9.
2
Mesothelin is more useful in pleural effusion than in serum in the diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma.间皮素在胸腔积液中的诊断价值优于血清,对于胸膜间皮瘤的诊断更有意义。
Anticancer Res. 2013 Jun;33(6):2707-13.
3
Combination of mesothelin and CEA significantly improves the differentiation between malignant pleural mesothelioma, benign asbestos disease, and lung cancer.联合检测间皮素和 CEA 可显著提高恶性胸膜间皮瘤、良性石棉肺和肺癌的鉴别诊断能力。
J Thorac Oncol. 2013 Jul;8(7):947-51. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31828f696b.
4
Soluble mesothelin-related peptide level elevation in mesothelioma serum and pleural effusions.间皮瘤血清和胸腔积液中可溶性间皮素相关肽水平升高。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Jan;85(1):265-72; discussion 272. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.07.042.
5
Diagnostic and prognostic value of soluble mesothelin-related proteins in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma in comparison with benign asbestosis and lung cancer.可溶性间皮素相关蛋白在恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者中的诊断和预后价值:与良性石棉肺和肺癌的比较
J Thorac Oncol. 2008 Nov;3(11):1317-24. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318187491c.
6
Evaluation of soluble mesothelin-related peptide as a diagnostic marker of malignant pleural mesothelioma effusions: its contribution to cytology.可溶性间皮素相关肽作为恶性胸膜间皮瘤胸腔积液诊断标志物的评估:对细胞学的贡献。
Cancer Invest. 2013 Jan;31(1):43-50. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2012.749265. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
7
Clinical significance of pleural effusion mesothelin in malignant pleural mesothelioma.恶性胸膜间皮瘤胸腔积液间皮素的临床意义。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Oct;49(10):1721-6. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.242. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
8
Soluble Mesothelin-Related Peptides to Monitor Recurrence After Resection of Pleural Mesothelioma.可溶性间皮素相关肽用于监测胸膜间皮瘤切除术后的复发情况。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Nov;104(5):1679-1687. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.06.042. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
9
Evaluation of New Biomarkers in the Prediction of Malignant Mesothelioma in Subjects with Environmental Asbestos Exposure.评估新生物标志物对环境石棉暴露人群恶性间皮瘤的预测价值。
Lung. 2016 Jun;194(3):409-17. doi: 10.1007/s00408-016-9868-1. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
10
Pleural effusion biomarkers and computed tomography findings in diagnosing malignant pleural mesothelioma: A retrospective study in a single center.用于诊断恶性胸膜间皮瘤的胸腔积液生物标志物及计算机断层扫描结果:一项单中心回顾性研究
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 2;12(10):e0185850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185850. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Asbestos and benign pleural diseases: a narrative review.石棉与良性胸膜疾病:一篇叙述性综述。
Breathe (Sheff). 2025 May 13;21(2):240236. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0236-2024. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
How can we use positron emission tomography/computed tomography more accurately for characterization of asbestos-related pleural thickening?我们如何能更准确地使用正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描来表征石棉相关的胸膜增厚?
Arch Med Sci. 2021 Mar 24;19(2):385-391. doi: 10.5114/aoms/111529. eCollection 2023.
3
Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Bioinformatic Analysis of Biomarkers for Prognosis of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.
恶性胸膜间皮瘤预后生物标志物的系统评价、荟萃分析和生物信息学分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Sep 12;12(9):2210. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12092210.
4
Clinical utility of diagnostic biomarkers in malignant pleural mesothelioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.诊断生物标志物在恶性胸膜间皮瘤中的临床应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Respir Rev. 2021 Nov 17;30(162). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0057-2021. Print 2021 Dec 31.
5
Does size matter? -a population-based analysis of malignant pleural mesothelioma.大小很重要吗?——基于人群的恶性胸膜间皮瘤分析
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020 Aug;9(4):1041-1052. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-19-488.
6
Putative Biomarkers for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Suggested by Proteomic Analysis of Cell Secretome.基于细胞分泌组的蛋白质组分析提示的恶性胸膜间皮瘤候选生物标志物。
Cancer Genomics Proteomics. 2020 May-Jun;17(3):225-236. doi: 10.21873/cgp.20183.
7
Case report: Steroid responsive mesothelioma-related pleural effusion.病例报告:类固醇反应性间皮瘤相关胸腔积液。
Respir Med Case Rep. 2018 Dec 19;26:131-135. doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2018.12.006. eCollection 2019.
8
Randomised controlled trial to compare the diagnostic yield of positron emission tomography CT (PET-CT) TARGETed pleural biopsy versus CT-guided pleural biopsy in suspected pleural malignancy (TARGET trial).比较正电子发射断层扫描CT(PET-CT)靶向胸膜活检与CT引导下胸膜活检在疑似胸膜恶性肿瘤中的诊断率的随机对照试验(TARGET试验)。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2018 Feb 19;5(1):e000270. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000270. eCollection 2018.
9
Pleural effusion biomarkers and computed tomography findings in diagnosing malignant pleural mesothelioma: A retrospective study in a single center.用于诊断恶性胸膜间皮瘤的胸腔积液生物标志物及计算机断层扫描结果:一项单中心回顾性研究
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 2;12(10):e0185850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185850. eCollection 2017.
10
A pilot study of zoledronic acid in the treatment of patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma.唑来膦酸治疗晚期恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者的一项前瞻性研究。
Lung Cancer (Auckl). 2017 Jun 12;8:39-44. doi: 10.2147/LCTT.S135802. eCollection 2017.