Suppr超能文献

仅B型超声作为颈动脉狭窄的筛查工具是否足够?一项初步研究。

Is B-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? A pilot study.

作者信息

Bhandari Tina, Socransky Steven J

机构信息

Emergency Department, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto M4N 3M5, ON, Canada.

Emergency Department, Health Sciences North, 41 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury P3E 5J1, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Ultrasound J. 2014 Oct 1;6(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13089-014-0017-x. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid ultrasound is performed solely in hospital ultrasound departments or outpatient labs, using both B- and Doppler modes. We hypothesize that B-mode without Doppler can be used to classify patients as having carotid stenosis (CS) above or below 50%. Our objective is to determine the frequency with which a CS >50% is found using Doppler when no such stenosis was visible using B-mode.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 100 patients referred to the stroke clinic and 100 patients referred for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). All patients had an elective carotid ultrasound done at Health Sciences North. The ultrasound reports were mixed together and blinded. Investigators determined if there was a CS of greater or less than 50% based on the carotid diagram. These results were compared to the degree of CS found on Doppler.

RESULTS

In the CEA group, there were 198 ultrasounds, with 153 showing a CS of >50%. Only one case of CS >50% was missed by B-mode. In the clinic group, 32 of 192 ultrasounds showed a CS of >50%. None were missed by B-mode. B-mode had a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100% and a specificity of 65%.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the theory that it may be possible to use B-mode ultrasound without Doppler to reliably determine if there is CS above or below 50%. Further research is required before carotid ultrasound using B-mode alone can be recommended.

摘要

背景

颈动脉超声仅在医院超声科或门诊实验室进行,使用B模式和多普勒模式。我们假设不使用多普勒的B模式可用于将患者分类为患有50%以上或以下的颈动脉狭窄(CS)。我们的目的是确定在B模式下未发现此类狭窄时,使用多普勒发现CS>50%的频率。

方法

这是一项对100名转诊至卒中门诊的患者和100名转诊接受颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的患者的回顾性研究。所有患者均在北健康科学中心接受了选择性颈动脉超声检查。超声报告混合在一起并进行了盲法处理。研究人员根据颈动脉图像确定CS是否大于或小于50%。将这些结果与多普勒检查发现的CS程度进行比较。

结果

在CEA组中,共进行了198次超声检查,其中153次显示CS>50%。B模式仅漏诊了1例CS>50%的病例。在门诊组中,192次超声检查中有32次显示CS>50%。B模式无一漏诊。B模式的敏感性和阴性预测值为100%,特异性为65%。

结论

本研究支持以下理论,即不使用多普勒的B模式超声可能能够可靠地确定是否存在50%以上或以下的CS。在推荐单独使用B模式进行颈动脉超声检查之前,还需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e42/4261905/bacdc8dad2ef/s13089-014-0017-x-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验