Suppr超能文献

确定适用于北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验的双功多普勒超声标准。

Determination of duplex Doppler ultrasound criteria appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial.

作者信息

Carpenter J P, Lexa F J, Davis J T

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

Stroke. 1996 Apr;27(4):695-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.4.695.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trail (NASCET) demonstrated the benefit of carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic patients with > or = 70% carotid stenosis. Screening for detection of significant carotid occlusive disease has relied on duplex Doppler imaging. However, traditional duplex categories (50% to 79%, 80% to 99%) are not directly applicable to NASCET. We sought to evaluate duplex criteria for determination of > or = 70% carotid stenosis.

METHODS

Duplex scan and arteriograms of 110 patients (210 carotids), performed within 1 month of each other, were reviewed by blinded readers. Arteriographic stenosis was determined by the NASCET method. Duplex measurements of peak systolic and end-diastolic velocity (PSV, EDV) were recorded, and ratios of velocities in the internal and common carotid arteries (ICA, CCA) were calculated. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and accuracy were determined.

RESULTS

Interobserver agreement for measurement of arteriographic stenosis was "almost perfect" (kappa=0.86). The criteria chosen for detection of > or = 70% stenosis were PSVICA>210 cm/s (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 77%; PPV, 68% NPV, 96% accuracy, 83%) EDVICA>70 cm/s (sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 60%; PPV, 73%; NPV, 86%; accuracy 77%), PSVica/PSVCCA >3.0 (sensitivity, 91%; specificity, 78%; PPV, 70%; NPV, 94%; accuracy, 83%), and EDVICA/EDVCCA>3.3 (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 65%; PPV, 65% NPV, 100%; accuracy, 79%).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that > or = 70% carotid stenosis can be reliably determined by duplex Doppler ultrasound. Individual vascular laboratories must validate their own results.

摘要

背景与目的

北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验(NASCET)证明了颈动脉内膜切除术对症状性颈动脉狭窄≥70%患者的益处。对显著颈动脉闭塞性疾病的筛查一直依赖于双功多普勒成像。然而,传统的双功分类(50%至79%,80%至99%)并不直接适用于NASCET。我们试图评估用于确定颈动脉狭窄≥70%的双功标准。

方法

由不知情的读者回顾了110例患者(210条颈动脉)在彼此1个月内进行的双功扫描和动脉造影。动脉造影狭窄通过NASCET方法确定。记录收缩期峰值和舒张末期速度(PSV,EDV)的双功测量值,并计算颈内动脉和颈总动脉(ICA,CCA)的速度比值。确定了敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值(PPV,NPV)以及准确性的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线。

结果

动脉造影狭窄测量的观察者间一致性“几乎完美”(kappa = 0.86)。用于检测≥70%狭窄的标准为:PSVICA>210 cm/s(敏感性94%;特异性77%;PPV 68%;NPV 96%;准确性83%);EDVICA>70 cm/s(敏感性92%;特异性60%;PPV 73%;NPV 86%;准确性77%);PSVica/PSVCCA>3.0(敏感性91%;特异性78%;PPV 70%;NPV 94%;准确性83%);以及EDVICA/EDVCCA>3.3(敏感性100%;特异性65%;PPV 65%;NPV 100%;准确性79%)。

结论

我们得出结论,双功多普勒超声可可靠地确定颈动脉狭窄≥70%。各个血管实验室必须验证自己的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验