• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reading component skills in dyslexia: word recognition, comprehension and processing speed.阅读障碍中的阅读成分技能:单词识别、阅读理解和处理速度。
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 28;5:1339. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01339. eCollection 2014.
2
Relationships among cognitive deficits and component skills of reading in younger and older students with developmental dyslexia.发展性阅读障碍的年轻和年长学生的认知缺陷与阅读组成技能之间的关系。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Sep;34(9):2946-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
3
Reading comprehension skills of young adults with childhood diagnoses of dyslexia.童年期被诊断为诵读困难的年轻人的阅读理解能力。
J Learn Disabil. 2003 Nov-Dec;36(6):538-55. doi: 10.1177/00222194030360060501.
4
Morphological Awareness and Its Role in Compensation in Adults with Dyslexia.形态意识及其在阅读障碍成年人补偿机制中的作用。
Dyslexia. 2015 Aug;21(3):254-72. doi: 10.1002/dys.1495. Epub 2015 Jan 25.
5
Persistence of dyslexia: the Connecticut Longitudinal Study at adolescence.阅读障碍的持续性:康涅狄格纵向青少年研究
Pediatrics. 1999 Dec;104(6):1351-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.6.1351.
6
NL reading skills mediate the relationship between NL phonological processing skills and a foreign language (FL) reading skills in students with and without dyslexia: a case of a NL (Polish) and FL (English) with different degrees of orthographic consistency.荷兰语阅读技能在有和没有阅读障碍的学生中调节了荷兰语语音处理技能与外语(英语)阅读技能之间的关系:以具有不同程度正字法一致性的荷兰语(波兰语)和外语(英语)为例。
Ann Dyslexia. 2019 Jul;69(2):219-242. doi: 10.1007/s11881-019-00181-x. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
7
Development of reading-related skills in Chinese and English among Hong Kong Chinese children with and without dyslexia.有阅读障碍和无阅读障碍的香港华裔儿童中英文阅读相关技能的发展
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Jun;122:75-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.12.003. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
8
Rapid automatized naming, phonology and dyslexia in Polish children.波兰儿童的快速自动命名、语音学与阅读障碍
Med Sci Monit. 2009 Sep;15(9):CR460-9.
9
Reading speed and phonological awareness deficits among Arabic-speaking children with dyslexia.患有阅读障碍的阿拉伯语儿童的阅读速度和语音意识缺陷
Dyslexia. 2015 Feb;21(1):80-95. doi: 10.1002/dys.1491. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
10
Word recognition deficits in German: more evidence from a representative sample.德语中的单词识别缺陷:来自代表性样本的更多证据。
Dyslexia. 2001 Oct-Dec;7(4):183-96. doi: 10.1002/dys.199.

引用本文的文献

1
Phonological working memory and linguistic processing speed in inferential reading comprehension.推理阅读理解中的语音工作记忆与语言处理速度
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2025 Jul 1;38(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s41155-025-00356-z.
2
Testing the Effectiveness of Computerized Cognitive Training on an At-Risk Student Population.测试计算机化认知训练对高危学生群体的有效性。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 14;14(8):711. doi: 10.3390/bs14080711.
3
Prismatic adaptation coupled with cognitive training as novel treatment for developmental dyslexia: a randomized controlled trial.三棱镜适应联合认知训练治疗发育性阅读障碍:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 26;14(1):7148. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57499-9.
4
Reading digital- versus print-easy texts: a study with university students who prefer digital sources.阅读数字版与印刷版的简易文本:一项针对偏好数字资源的大学生的研究。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2022 May 6;35(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41155-022-00212-4.
5
Extending the Simple View of Reading to Account for Variation Within Readers and Across Texts: The Complete View of Reading (CVR).将阅读的简单观点扩展以解释读者内部和文本之间的差异:阅读的完整观点(CVR)。
Remedial Spec Educ. 2018 Sep;39(5):274-288. doi: 10.1177/0741932518772904. Epub 2018 Sep 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Is rapid automatized naming related to reading and mathematics for the same reason(s)? A follow-up study from kindergarten to Grade 1.快速命名与阅读和数学是否因同样的原因有关?一项从幼儿园到 1 年级的后续研究。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Jul;115(3):481-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
2
Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities.快速命名自动化测验(RAN)和阅读流畅性:对阅读障碍理解和治疗的启示。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:427-52. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100431. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
3
Indexing response to intervention: a longitudinal study of reading risk from kindergarten through third grade.对干预措施的索引反应:一项从幼儿园到三年级阅读风险的纵向研究。
J Learn Disabil. 2008 Mar-Apr;41(2):158-73. doi: 10.1177/0022219407313587.
4
Diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities based on the component model of reading: an alternative to the discrepancy model of LD.基于阅读成分模型的阅读障碍诊断与治疗:学习障碍差异模型的替代方案
J Learn Disabil. 2008 Jan-Feb;41(1):67-84. doi: 10.1177/0022219407310838.
5
The education of dyslexic children from childhood to young adulthood.阅读障碍儿童从童年到青年期的教育。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59:451-75. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093633.
6
Layers of reading intervention in kindergarten through third grade: changes in teaching and student outcomes.幼儿园至三年级阅读干预层次:教学与学生成果的变化
J Learn Disabil. 2005 Sep-Oct;38(5):440-55. doi: 10.1177/00222194050380050701.
7
Using our current understanding of dyslexia to support early identification and intervention.运用我们目前对诵读困难症的理解来支持早期识别和干预。
J Child Neurol. 2004 Oct;19(10):759-65. doi: 10.1177/08830738040190100501.
8
Not all reading disabilities are alike.并非所有阅读障碍都是一样的。
J Learn Disabil. 1999 Mar-Apr;32(2):120-37. doi: 10.1177/002221949903200203.

阅读障碍中的阅读成分技能:单词识别、阅读理解和处理速度。

Reading component skills in dyslexia: word recognition, comprehension and processing speed.

作者信息

de Oliveira Darlene G, da Silva Patrícia B, Dias Natália M, Seabra Alessandra G, Macedo Elizeu C

机构信息

Developmental Disorders Program, Center for Health and Biological Science, Mackenzie Presbyterian University Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Educational Psychology Post-graduation Program, FIEO University Center Osasco, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 28;5:1339. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01339. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01339
PMID:25506331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4246655/
Abstract

The cognitive model of reading comprehension (RC) posits that RC is a result of the interaction between decoding and linguistic comprehension. Recently, the notion of decoding skill was expanded to include word recognition. In addition, some studies suggest that other skills could be integrated into this model, like processing speed, and have consistently indicated that this skill influences and is an important predictor of the main components of the model, such as vocabulary for comprehension and phonological awareness of word recognition. The following study evaluated the components of the RC model and predictive skills in children and adolescents with dyslexia. 40 children and adolescents (8-13 years) were divided in a Dyslexic Group (DG; 18 children, MA = 10.78, SD = 1.66) and control group (CG 22 children, MA = 10.59, SD = 1.86). All were students from the 2nd to 8th grade of elementary school and groups were equivalent in school grade, age, gender, and IQ. Oral and RC, word recognition, processing speed, picture naming, receptive vocabulary, and phonological awareness were assessed. There were no group differences regarding the accuracy in oral and RC, phonological awareness, naming, and vocabulary scores. DG performed worse than the CG in word recognition (general score and orthographic confusion items) and were slower in naming. Results corroborated the literature regarding word recognition and processing speed deficits in dyslexia. However, dyslexics can achieve normal scores on RC test. Data supports the importance of delimitation of different reading strategies embedded in the word recognition component. The role of processing speed in reading problems remain unclear.

摘要

阅读理解(RC)的认知模型认为,阅读理解是解码与语言理解相互作用的结果。最近,解码技能的概念已扩展到包括单词识别。此外,一些研究表明,其他技能也可以整合到这个模型中,比如处理速度,并且一直表明这项技能会影响该模型的主要组成部分,并且是这些组成部分的重要预测指标,比如阅读理解所需的词汇量以及单词识别的语音意识。以下研究评估了患有阅读障碍的儿童和青少年的RC模型组成部分及预测技能。40名儿童和青少年(8至13岁)被分为阅读障碍组(DG;18名儿童,平均年龄MA = 10.78,标准差SD = 1.66)和对照组(CG;22名儿童,平均年龄MA = 10.59,标准差SD = 1.86)。所有人均为小学二至八年级的学生,两组在年级、年龄、性别和智商方面相当。评估了口语和阅读理解、单词识别、处理速度、图片命名、接受性词汇量以及语音意识。在口语和阅读理解、语音意识、命名和词汇得分的准确性方面,两组之间没有差异。在单词识别方面(总体得分和正字法混淆项目),DG组的表现比CG组差,并且在命名方面速度较慢。结果证实了关于阅读障碍中单词识别和处理速度缺陷的文献。然而,阅读障碍者在RC测试中可以取得正常分数。数据支持了界定单词识别组件中不同阅读策略的重要性。处理速度在阅读问题中的作用仍不明确。