Bresó-Grancha Noemí, Jorques-Infante María José, Moret-Tatay Carmen
Escuela de Doctorado, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, San Agustín 3, Esc. A, Entresuelo 1, 46002, València, Spain.
MEB lab, Faculty of Psychology|, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, Avenida de la Ilustración, 4, Burjassot, Valencia, 46100, Spain.
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2022 May 6;35(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41155-022-00212-4.
The transition from on-paper to on-screen reading seems to make it necessary to raise some considerations, as a greater attentional effort has been claimed for print texts than digital ones. Not surprisingly, most university students prefer this digital medium. This research aims to examine reading times by contextualizing this phenomenon into two processes: namely, word recognition and reading comprehension task on paper and on screen. Thus, two different tasks-counterbalanced into digital and print mediums-were carried out per each participant with a preference for a digital medium: a reading comprehension task (RCT) and a lexical decision task (LDT) after reading a specific story. Participants were slower reading print texts and no statistically significant differences were found in RCT accuracy. This result suggests that the task required more cognitive resources under the print medium for those with a worse comprehension performance in reading, and a more conservative pattern in digital RCT for those with a better performance.
从纸质阅读到屏幕阅读的转变似乎有必要引发一些思考,因为据称阅读印刷文本比阅读数字文本需要付出更多的注意力。不出所料,大多数大学生更喜欢这种数字媒介。本研究旨在通过将这一现象置于两个过程中来考察阅读时间:即在纸质和屏幕上的单词识别和阅读理解任务。因此,对于每个偏好数字媒介的参与者,都进行了两个不同的任务——在数字和印刷媒介之间进行平衡——:在阅读一个特定故事后进行阅读理解任务(RCT)和词汇判断任务(LDT)。参与者阅读印刷文本的速度较慢,在RCT准确性方面未发现统计学上的显著差异。这一结果表明,对于阅读理解能力较差的人来说,在印刷媒介下完成任务需要更多的认知资源,而对于表现较好的人来说,在数字RCT中则呈现出更为保守的模式。