• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无症状性颈动脉狭窄行内膜剥脱术后发生重大不良事件风险较高的患者。

Patients at elevated risk of major adverse events following endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

作者信息

Wu Tiffany Y, Akopian Gabriel, Katz Steven G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Pasadena, CA 91105, USA.

Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Pasadena, CA 91105, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2015 Jun;209(6):1069-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.07.011
PMID:25510477
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) as treatment in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis is the subject of much debate.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2012 was queried. Patients undergoing CEA for asymptomatic carotid stenosis were identified. Preoperative risk factors and patient demographics were compared using chi-square analysis and logistic regression to determine their relation with stroke and death.

RESULTS

During an 8-year period, 24,211 CEAs performed for asymptomatic carotid stenosis were identified. Patients with dependent functional status (12.5%), recent myocardial infarction (6.3%), chronic heart failure (5.0%), hypoalbuminemia (4.8%), angina (4.1%), dialysis dependence (3.4%), steroid dependence (3.4%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (3.3%), and American Society of Anesthesiologists > 3 (3.2%) had a clinically significant increase in risk of stroke and death. Patients with none of the above risk factors had a stroke and death rate of 1.08%, which was significantly less than the overall stroke and death rate (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

A high-risk subset of patients undergoing CEA for asymptomatic carotid stenosis can be identified. If patient selection is optimized and perioperative morbidity and mortality are minimized, CEA will continue to play an important role in stroke prevention for those with significant asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

摘要

背景

颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)作为无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的治疗方法存在诸多争议。

方法

查询2005年至2012年的国家外科质量改进计划数据库。确定接受CEA治疗无症状性颈动脉狭窄的患者。使用卡方分析和逻辑回归比较术前危险因素和患者人口统计学特征,以确定它们与中风和死亡的关系。

结果

在8年期间,共确定了24211例因无症状性颈动脉狭窄而进行的CEA手术。功能依赖状态(12.5%)、近期心肌梗死(6.3%)、慢性心力衰竭(5.0%)、低白蛋白血症(4.8%)、心绞痛(4.1%)、透析依赖(3.4%)、类固醇依赖(3.4%)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(3.3%)以及美国麻醉医师协会分级>3(3.2%)的患者,中风和死亡风险有临床意义的显著增加。无上述任何危险因素的患者中风和死亡率为1.08%,显著低于总体中风和死亡率(P<.001)。

结论

可以识别出接受CEA治疗无症状性颈动脉狭窄的高危患者亚组。如果优化患者选择并将围手术期发病率和死亡率降至最低,CEA将继续在预防有显著无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的中风方面发挥重要作用。

相似文献

1
Patients at elevated risk of major adverse events following endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄行内膜剥脱术后发生重大不良事件风险较高的患者。
Am J Surg. 2015 Jun;209(6):1069-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
2
Predictors of 30-day postoperative stroke or death after carotid endarterectomy using the 2012 carotid endarterectomy-targeted American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.2012 年颈动脉内膜切除术靶向美国外科医师学院国家外科质量改进计划数据库评估颈动脉内膜切除术后 30 天卒中和死亡的预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jan;61(1):103-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.100. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
3
Revascularization of asymptomatic carotid stenosis is not appropriate in patients on dialysis.对于正在接受透析治疗的患者,对无症状性颈动脉狭窄进行血管重建术并不合适。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Mar;61(3):670-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.002.
4
Outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: is there a high-risk population? A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program report.颈动脉内膜切除术的术后结果:是否存在高危人群?一项国家外科质量改进计划报告。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Feb;49(2):331-8, 339.e1; discussion 338-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.09.018.
5
Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy: results from the SVS Vascular Registry.颈动脉支架置入术和动脉内膜切除术的风险调整后30天结局:来自血管外科学会(SVS)血管登记处的结果
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jan;49(1):71-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.039. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
6
The effect of surgeon's specialty and volume on the perioperative outcome of carotid endarterectomy.外科医生的专业和手术量对颈动脉内膜切除术围手术期结果的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Sep;58(3):666-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.02.016. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
7
Carotid endarterectomy was performed with lower stroke and death rates than carotid artery stenting in the United States in 2003 and 2004.2003年和2004年在美国,颈动脉内膜切除术的实施带来的中风和死亡率低于颈动脉支架置入术。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec;46(6):1112-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.08.030.
8
Preoperative frailty Risk Analysis Index to stratify patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.用于对接受颈动脉内膜切除术的患者进行分层的术前衰弱风险分析指数。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Mar;61(3):683-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
9
Defining the threshold surgeon volume associated with improved patient outcomes for carotid endarterectomy.确定颈动脉内膜切除术患者结局改善相关的外科医生手术量阈值。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;72(1):209-218.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.057. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
10
Defining the high-risk patient for carotid endarterectomy: an analysis of the prospective National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.确定颈动脉内膜切除术的高危患者:对前瞻性国家外科质量改进计划数据库的分析
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):285-295; discussion 295-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.069.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive Score of Adverse Events After Carotid Endarterectomy: The NSQIP Registry Carotid Endarterectomy Scale.颈动脉内膜切除术不良事件的预测评分:NSQIP 登记处颈动脉内膜切除术量表。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 5;8(21):e013412. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013412. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
2
Contemporary outcomes after carotid endarterectomy in high-risk anatomic and physiologic patients.高危解剖和生理患者颈动脉内膜切除术的当代结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;71(1):104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.05.041. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
3
Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Concepts and Practice Patterns.
颈动脉内膜切除术:当前概念与实践模式
Int J Angiol. 2015 Sep;24(3):223-35. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1558645. Epub 2015 Aug 14.