Suppr超能文献

估算人群归因分数以量化肥胖的健康负担。

Estimating population attributable fractions to quantify the health burden of obesity.

作者信息

Flegal Katherine M, Panagiotou Orestis A, Graubard Barry I

机构信息

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD.

Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.

出版信息

Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Mar;25(3):201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Nov 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Obesity is a highly prevalent condition in the United States and elsewhere and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Here, we discuss some issues involved in quantifying the health burden of obesity using population attributable fraction (PAF) estimates and provide examples.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for articles reporting attributable fraction estimates for obesity. We reviewed eligible articles to identify methodological concerns and tabulated illustrative examples of PAF estimates for obesity relative to cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

There is considerable variability among studies regarding the methods used for PAF calculation and the selection of appropriate counterfactuals. The reported estimates ranged from 5% to 15% for all-cause mortality, -0.2% to 8% for all-cancer incidence, 7% to 44% for cardiovascular disease incidence, and 3% to 83% for diabetes incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

To evaluate a given estimate, it is important to consider whether the exposure and outcome were defined similarly for the PAF and for the relative risks, whether the relative risks were suitable for the population at hand, and whether PAF was calculated using correct methods. Strong causal assumptions are not necessarily warranted. In general, PAFs for obesity may be best considered as indicators of association.

摘要

目的

肥胖在美国及其他地区是一种高度普遍的状况,并且与死亡率和发病率的增加相关。在此,我们讨论使用人群归因分数(PAF)估计值来量化肥胖对健康的负担所涉及的一些问题,并提供实例。

方法

我们在PubMed上搜索报告肥胖归因分数估计值的文章。我们对符合条件的文章进行综述,以确定方法学方面的问题,并列出肥胖相对于癌症、糖尿病、心血管疾病和全因死亡率的PAF估计值的说明性示例。

结果

关于PAF计算所使用的方法以及合适反事实的选择,各研究之间存在相当大的差异。全因死亡率的报告估计值范围为5%至15%,所有癌症发病率的估计值范围为-0.2%至8%,心血管疾病发病率的估计值范围为7%至44%,糖尿病发病率的估计值范围为3%至83%。

结论

为评估给定的估计值,重要的是要考虑PAF和相对风险的暴露与结局定义是否相似,相对风险是否适用于手头的人群,以及PAF是否使用正确的方法计算。不一定需要强有力的因果假设。一般而言,肥胖的PAF最好被视为关联指标。

相似文献

10

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验