• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗后一年子宫保留型肌瘤治疗方法的成本比较。

Cost comparison between uterine-sparing fibroid treatments one year following treatment.

作者信息

Borah Bijan J, Carls Ginger S, Moore Brian J, Gibson Teresa B, Moriarty James P, Stewart Elizabeth A

机构信息

Division of Health Care Policy and Research & College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Truven Health Analytics, 777 E. Eisenhower Parkway, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA.

出版信息

J Ther Ultrasound. 2014 Mar 31;2:7. doi: 10.1186/2050-5736-2-7. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1186/2050-5736-2-7
PMID:25512868
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4265990/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare one-year all-cause and uterine fibroid (UF)-related direct costs in patients treated with one of the following three uterine-sparing procedures: magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS), uterine artery embolization (UAE) and myomectomy.

METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort study used healthcare claims for several million individuals with healthcare coverage from employers in the MarketScan Database for the period 2003-2010. UF patients aged 25-54 on their first UF procedure (index) date with 366-day baseline experience, 366-day follow-up period, continuous health plan enrollment during baseline and follow-up, and absence of any baseline UF procedures were included in the final sample. Cost outcomes were measured by allowed charges (sum of insurer-paid and patient-paid amounts). UF-related cost was defined as difference in mean cost between study cohorts and propensity-score-matched control cohorts without UF. Multivariate adjustment of cost outcomes was conducted using generalized linear models.

RESULTS

The study sample comprised 14,426 patients (MRgFUS = 14; UAE = 4,092; myomectomy = 10,320) with a higher percent of older patients in MRgFUS cohort (71% vs. 50% vs. 12% in age-group 45-54, P < 0.001). Adjusted all-cause mean cost was lowest for MRgFUS ($19,763; 95% CI: $10,425-$38,694) followed by myomectomy ($20,407; 95% CI: $19,483-$21,381) and UAE ($25,019; 95% CI: $23,738-$26,376) but without statistical significance. Adjusted UF-related costs were also not significantly different between the three procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjusted all-cause and UF-related costs at one year were not significantly different between patients undergoing MRgFUS, myomectomy and UAE.

摘要

背景

比较接受以下三种保留子宫手术之一的患者的一年全因成本和子宫肌瘤(UF)相关直接成本:磁共振引导聚焦超声(MRgFUS)、子宫动脉栓塞术(UAE)和肌瘤切除术。

方法

这项回顾性观察性队列研究使用了2003 - 2010年期间MarketScan数据库中数百万有雇主医保覆盖人群的医疗理赔数据。最终样本纳入了年龄在25 - 54岁、首次进行UF手术(索引)日期、有366天基线经历、366天随访期、在基线和随访期间持续参加健康计划且无任何基线UF手术的UF患者。成本结果通过允许费用(保险公司支付和患者支付金额之和)来衡量。UF相关成本定义为研究队列与无UF的倾向评分匹配对照队列之间的平均成本差异。使用广义线性模型对成本结果进行多变量调整。

结果

研究样本包括14426例患者(MRgFUS组 = 14例;UAE组 = 4092例;肌瘤切除术组 = 10320例),MRgFUS队列中老年患者比例更高(45 - 54岁年龄组中分别为71%、50%和12%,P < 0.001)。调整后的全因平均成本MRgFUS最低(19763美元;95%可信区间:10425 - 38694美元),其次是肌瘤切除术(20407美元;95%可信区间:19483 - 21381美元)和UAE(25019美元;95%可信区间:23738 - 26376美元),但无统计学意义。三种手术之间调整后的UF相关成本也无显著差异。

结论

接受MRgFUS、肌瘤切除术和UAE的患者在一年时调整后的全因成本和UF相关成本无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49cd/4265990/08b55d8b6487/2050-5736-2-7-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49cd/4265990/2aa282d82da9/2050-5736-2-7-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49cd/4265990/08b55d8b6487/2050-5736-2-7-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49cd/4265990/2aa282d82da9/2050-5736-2-7-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49cd/4265990/08b55d8b6487/2050-5736-2-7-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost comparison between uterine-sparing fibroid treatments one year following treatment.治疗后一年子宫保留型肌瘤治疗方法的成本比较。
J Ther Ultrasound. 2014 Mar 31;2:7. doi: 10.1186/2050-5736-2-7. eCollection 2014.
2
Cost-effectiveness of uterine-preserving procedures for the treatment of uterine fibroid symptoms in the USA.美国保留子宫手术治疗子宫肌瘤症状的成本效益分析
J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Sep;3(5):503-14. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.32. Epub 2014 May 30.
3
Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound for the treatment of uterine fibroids.磁共振引导聚焦超声治疗子宫肌瘤的成本效益分析
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jan;25(1):14-25. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309090035.
4
Direct Costs Incurred Among Women Undergoing Surgical Procedures to Treat Uterine Fibroids.接受子宫肌瘤手术治疗的女性所产生的直接成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Jan;26(1-a Suppl):S2-S10. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.1-a.s2.
5
The comparison of myomectomy, UAE and MRgFUS in the treatment of uterine fibroids: a meta analysis.子宫肌瘤剔除术、UAE 和 MRgFUS 治疗子宫肌瘤的比较:荟萃分析。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2021 Sep;38(2):24-29. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1933216.
6
What are the total costs of surgical treatment for uterine fibroids?子宫肌瘤手术治疗的总费用是多少?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 Sep;17(7):1119-32. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.0456.
7
Reintervention Rates After Myomectomy, Endometrial Ablation, and Uterine Artery Embolization for Patients with Uterine Fibroids.子宫肌瘤患者行子宫肌瘤剔除术、子宫内膜消融术和子宫动脉栓塞术后的再干预率。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Oct;27(10):1204-1214. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6752. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
8
Magnetic Resonance-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MRgHIFU) for Treatment of Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids: An Economic Analysis.磁共振引导高强度聚焦超声(MRgHIFU)治疗有症状子宫肌瘤的经济学分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2015 Mar 1;15(5):1-61. eCollection 2015.
9
Payer costs in patients undergoing uterine artery embolization, hysterectomy, or myomectomy for treatment of uterine fibroids.接受子宫动脉栓塞术、子宫切除术或肌瘤切除术治疗子宫肌瘤的患者的支付方成本。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Oct;18(10):1207-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.07.007.
10
Clinical predictors of successful magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) for uterine leiomyoma.磁共振引导聚焦超声(MRgFUS)治疗子宫平滑肌瘤成功的临床预测因素
J Ther Ultrasound. 2013 Sep 2;1:15. doi: 10.1186/2050-5736-1-15. eCollection 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
The Annual Economic Burden of Uterine Fibroids in the United States (2010 Versus 2022): A Comparative Cost-Analysis.美国子宫肌瘤的年度经济负担(2010年与2022年对比):一项成本比较分析
Reprod Sci. 2024 Dec;31(12):3743-3756. doi: 10.1007/s43032-024-01727-0. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
2
Comparison of Costs, Re-Intervention Rates, and Length of Hospital Stay for Three Uterus Sparing Interventions for Uterine Fibroids: A 2-Year Retrospective Claims Analysis.三种子宫肌瘤保留子宫干预措施的成本、再次干预率及住院时间比较:一项为期2年的回顾性索赔分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Jul 29;16:523-536. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S437353. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
MR-guided focus ultrasound (MRgFUS) for symptomatic uterine fibroids: predictors of treatment success.磁共振引导聚焦超声(MRgFUS)治疗症状性子宫肌瘤:治疗成功的预测因素。
Hum Reprod. 2012 Dec;27(12):3425-31. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des333. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
2
Clinical 24 month experience of the first MRgFUS unit for treatment of uterine fibroids in Australia.澳大利亚首台用于治疗子宫肌瘤的磁共振引导聚焦超声(MRgFUS)设备的24个月临床经验。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2012 Aug;56(4):409-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2012.02376.x. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
3
The estimated annual cost of uterine leiomyomata in the United States.
Reintervention Rates After Myomectomy, Endometrial Ablation, and Uterine Artery Embolization for Patients with Uterine Fibroids.
子宫肌瘤患者行子宫肌瘤剔除术、子宫内膜消融术和子宫动脉栓塞术后的再干预率。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Oct;27(10):1204-1214. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6752. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
4
Uterine Fibroids: Burden and Unmet Medical Need.子宫肌瘤:负担与未满足的医疗需求
Semin Reprod Med. 2017 Nov;35(6):473-480. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1607264. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
5
Cost and Distribution of Hysterectomy and Uterine Artery Embolization in the United States: Regional/Rural/Urban Disparities.美国子宫切除术和子宫动脉栓塞术的成本与分布:地区/农村/城市差异
Med Sci (Basel). 2017 May 16;5(2):10. doi: 10.3390/medsci5020010.
估计美国子宫平滑肌瘤的年度成本。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;206(3):211.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.002. Epub 2011 Dec 11.
4
Comparing focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization for uterine fibroids-rationale and design of the Fibroid Interventions: reducing symptoms today and tomorrow (FIRSTT) trial.比较聚焦超声与子宫动脉栓塞治疗子宫肌瘤的疗效:子宫肌瘤干预减少今天和明天的症状研究(FIRSTT)试验的原理和设计。
Fertil Steril. 2011 Sep;96(3):704-10. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.062. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
5
Successful MRI-Guided Focused Ultrasound Uterine Fibroid Treatment Despite an Ostomy and Significant Abdominal Wall Scarring.尽管存在造口术和明显的腹壁瘢痕形成,MRI引导下聚焦超声治疗子宫肌瘤仍取得成功。
ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:962621. doi: 10.5402/2011/962621. Epub 2010 Oct 17.
6
Successful magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery for recurrent uterine fibroid previously treated with uterine artery embolization.成功进行磁共振成像引导下聚焦超声手术治疗先前接受子宫动脉栓塞术治疗的复发性子宫肌瘤。
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2010;2010. doi: 10.1155/2010/351273. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
7
Eligibility and accessibility of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) for the treatment of uterine leiomyomas.磁共振引导聚焦超声(MRgFUS)治疗子宫肌瘤的适宜性和可及性。
Fertil Steril. 2010 Oct;94(5):1864-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.063.
8
Clinical outcomes of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine myomas: 24-month follow-up.磁共振引导聚焦超声手术治疗子宫肌瘤的临床疗效:24 个月随访。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;34(5):584-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.7455.
9
Uterine fibroid embolization.子宫肌瘤栓塞术
N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 13;361(7):690-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct0806942.
10
Decreasing margins to the uterine serosa as a method for increasing the volume of fibroids ablated with magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery.减小至子宫浆膜的边缘作为一种增加磁共振引导聚焦超声手术消融肌瘤体积的方法。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Sep;146(1):92-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 May 28.