Businco L, Cantani A, Di Fazio A, Bernardini L
Department of Paediatrics, University of Roma La Sapienza, Italy.
Clin Exp Allergy. 1990 Nov;20(6):683-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1990.tb02708.x.
The aim of this double-blind placebo-controlled trial was to assess the efficacy and tolerance of nedocromil sodium at a dose of 4 mg four times daily, in the management of children suffering from grass-pollen asthma. Thirty-one children suffering from seasonal asthma (24 boys and seven girls, aged 4-21 yr, mean 11 yr) were enrolled in the study during the 1988 pollen season. Only one child was aged 4 yr, and she was a cooperative girl able to use the metered dose inhaler properly. In addition, in each group there was a patient aged 20 and 21 years, respectively, who had been followed up by us since childhood. Treatments were delivered by pressurized aerosol over a period of 4 weeks following a 1-week baseline, during which patients were required to show active disease by obtaining a minimum symptom score (almost 2 points of severity score on at least 3 days of the baseline period). The patients were randomly assigned to both treatment groups, all were taking inhaled or oral bronchodilators, when necessary. Twenty-nine patients completed the trial, 16 in the nedocromil sodium treatment group and 13 in the placebo group. One child of each group was withdrawn due to treatment failure. Statistically significant differences in favour of nedocromil sodium were found regarding morning tightness and mean morning PEFR values on diary cards (P less than 0.01 and P less than 0.05, respectively), bronchodilator usage (P less than 0.05), pulmonary function tests (PFT) at clinic visits (P less than 0.05), and in parents' opinion (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
这项双盲安慰剂对照试验的目的是评估每日四次服用4毫克奈多罗米钠对患有草花粉性哮喘儿童的疗效和耐受性。在1988年花粉季节期间,31名患有季节性哮喘的儿童(24名男孩和7名女孩,年龄4至21岁,平均11岁)被纳入该研究。只有一名儿童为4岁,她是一名配合度高且能正确使用定量气雾剂的女孩。此外,每组分别有一名20岁和21岁的患者,他们自童年起就一直由我们随访。在1周的基线期后,通过压力气雾剂进行为期4周的治疗,在此期间,患者需通过获得最低症状评分(在基线期至少3天的严重程度评分几乎达到2分)来显示疾病处于活动期。患者被随机分配到两个治疗组,必要时所有人都在使用吸入或口服支气管扩张剂。29名患者完成了试验,奈多罗米钠治疗组有16名,安慰剂组有13名。每组各有一名儿童因治疗失败而退出。在日记卡上的晨间紧绷感和平均晨间呼气峰流速值(分别为P<0.01和P<0.05)、支气管扩张剂使用情况(P<0.05)、门诊时的肺功能测试(PFT)(P<0.05)以及家长的评价(P<0.05)方面,发现有利于奈多罗米钠的统计学显著差异。(摘要截断于250字)